fluid-telegram/internal/plan/plan_test.go
tegwick 014ee5c746 Make the plan honest and the runbook's paths real
Two things that would have gone wrong on the first live run.

The plan promised "create bot.avatar" and apply had no avatar code at all:
/setuserpic needs a photo upload that is not implemented. A plan that
promises an action apply silently skips is worse than one that admits the
gap, because it makes every other line less trustworthy. The avatar is now
deferred, with instructions for setting it by hand.

The runbook wrote secrets to "<interface-path>/telegram/...", which is not
what the code computes. An operator following it would have put api_id and
api_hash somewhere the tool never looks, and found out at the first
connection attempt. Both documents now carry the real paths --
<mount>/fluid-telegram/<campaign>/telegram/<key> -- with a copy-pasteable
bao kv put for the one secret written by hand, and a verify step before
the session is minted.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0172sgCZEEDJcnQmr4SGDvKa

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 1361245@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: b3b428ef-f3e6-4688-b091-01f71461d66a
2026-09-04 22:02:56 +02:00

233 lines
7.5 KiB
Go

package plan
import (
"strings"
"testing"
"time"
"github.com/tegwick/fluid-telegram/internal/spec"
"github.com/tegwick/fluid-telegram/internal/state"
)
type fake struct {
botExists bool
rights map[int64][]string
usernames map[int64]string
}
func (f fake) BotExists(string) (bool, error) { return f.botExists, nil }
func (f fake) ChannelAdminRights(id int64) ([]string, error) {
if r, ok := f.rights[id]; ok {
return r, nil
}
return []string{spec.PostMessages}, nil
}
func (f fake) ChannelUsername(id int64) (string, error) { return f.usernames[id], nil }
func sp() *spec.Presence {
return &spec.Presence{
SchemaVersion: "0.1", Campaign: "hall-of-helix", Interface: "i",
Bot: spec.Bot{Name: "HelixForge", UsernamePreference: []string{"HelixForgeBot"}},
Channels: map[string]spec.Channel{
spec.Test: {Title: "t", Visibility: spec.Private},
spec.Live: {Title: "p", Visibility: spec.Public, UsernamePreference: []string{"hallofhelix"}},
},
}
}
func find(p *Plan, kind Kind, target string) *Action {
for i := range p.Actions {
if p.Actions[i].Kind == kind && p.Actions[i].Target == target {
return &p.Actions[i]
}
}
return nil
}
// First run: everything is created, and the public channel is blocked because
// no rendering has been checked yet.
func TestFirstRunCreatesAndBlocksPublic(t *testing.T) {
p, err := Compute(sp(), "sha256:x", &state.Resolved{}, fake{})
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if find(p, Attempt, "bot") == nil {
t.Error("expected a bot registration attempt")
}
if find(p, Create, "channel.test") == nil {
t.Error("expected the test channel to be created")
}
if find(p, Defer, "channel.public") == nil {
t.Error("public channel must be deferred until the test channel is verified")
}
// A first run is not an error state. The bot and the test channel must still
// be creatable while the public channel waits.
if p.Blocked() {
t.Errorf("a first run should not block:\n%s", p.Render())
}
if p.Empty() {
t.Error("a first run has work to do")
}
}
func provisioned(withTestPublication bool) *state.Resolved {
rs := &state.Resolved{
Campaign: "hall-of-helix",
Bot: state.Bot{Username: "HelixForgeBot", ID: 42},
Channels: map[string]state.Channel{
spec.Test: {ChatID: -100, AdminRights: []string{spec.PostMessages}},
spec.Live: {ChatID: -200, Username: "hallofhelix", AdminRights: []string{spec.PostMessages}},
},
}
if withTestPublication {
now := time.Now()
c := rs.Channels[spec.Test]
c.TestPublicationAt = &now
rs.Channels[spec.Test] = c
}
return rs
}
// Converged: a second run over an unchanged spec proposes nothing but the
// idempotent profile reassertion.
func TestConvergedRunIsQuiet(t *testing.T) {
f := fake{botExists: true, usernames: map[int64]string{-200: "hallofhelix"}}
p, err := Compute(sp(), "sha256:x", provisioned(true), f)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if p.Blocked() {
t.Fatalf("converged plan should not block:\n%s", p.Render())
}
for _, a := range p.Actions {
if a.Kind == Create || a.Kind == Attempt {
t.Errorf("unexpected %s of %s on a converged presence", a.Kind, a.Target)
}
}
}
// Widened rights are a refusal, not a repair.
func TestWidenedRightsBlock(t *testing.T) {
f := fake{botExists: true, usernames: map[int64]string{-200: "hallofhelix"},
rights: map[int64][]string{-200: {spec.PostMessages, "can_delete_messages"}}}
p, _ := Compute(sp(), "sha256:x", provisioned(true), f)
a := find(p, Block, "channel.public.admin")
if a == nil {
t.Fatalf("widened rights must block:\n%s", p.Render())
}
if !strings.Contains(a.Why, "not allowed to exercise") {
t.Errorf("block should explain why: %q", a.Why)
}
}
// A demoted bot blocks too -- losing the right is as much a drift as gaining one.
func TestLostRightsBlock(t *testing.T) {
f := fake{botExists: true, usernames: map[int64]string{-200: "hallofhelix"},
rights: map[int64][]string{-100: {}}}
p, _ := Compute(sp(), "sha256:x", provisioned(true), f)
if find(p, Block, "channel.test.admin") == nil {
t.Fatalf("a demoted bot must block:\n%s", p.Render())
}
}
// A username that changed underneath us is not reconciled.
func TestUsernameTakeoverBlocks(t *testing.T) {
f := fake{botExists: true, usernames: map[int64]string{-200: "someoneelse"}}
p, _ := Compute(sp(), "sha256:x", provisioned(true), f)
if find(p, Block, "channel.public.username") == nil {
t.Fatalf("a changed username must block:\n%s", p.Render())
}
}
// A missing bot blocks rather than being re-created, which would orphan the
// token already in OpenBao.
func TestMissingBotBlocks(t *testing.T) {
f := fake{botExists: false}
p, _ := Compute(sp(), "sha256:x", provisioned(true), f)
if find(p, Block, "bot") == nil {
t.Fatalf("an unreachable bot must block:\n%s", p.Render())
}
}
// Removing a channel from the spec warns; it never deletes.
func TestRemovedChannelWarnsNeverDeletes(t *testing.T) {
s := sp()
delete(s.Channels, spec.Live)
f := fake{botExists: true}
p, _ := Compute(s, "sha256:x", provisioned(true), f)
a := find(p, Warn, "channel.public")
if a == nil {
t.Fatalf("expected a warning:\n%s", p.Render())
}
for _, act := range p.Actions {
if strings.Contains(strings.ToLower(act.Detail), "delete") && act.Kind != Warn {
t.Errorf("plan proposed a deletion: %+v", act)
}
}
}
// Pointing a state file at a different campaign is a mistake, not a rename.
func TestCampaignMismatchBlocks(t *testing.T) {
rs := provisioned(true)
rs.Campaign = "some-other-campaign"
p, _ := Compute(sp(), "sha256:x", rs, fake{botExists: true})
if find(p, Block, "campaign") == nil {
t.Fatalf("campaign mismatch must block:\n%s", p.Render())
}
}
func TestRenderShowsRefusalsFirst(t *testing.T) {
rs := provisioned(true)
rs.Campaign = "some-other-campaign"
p, _ := Compute(sp(), "sha256:x", rs, fake{botExists: true})
out := p.Render()
if !strings.Contains(out, "nothing will be applied") {
t.Errorf("a blocked plan should say so:\n%s", out)
}
if !strings.Contains(out, "BLOCK") {
t.Error("expected a BLOCK in the render")
}
}
// A deferral is not a block: the two must not collapse into each other, or a
// first run can never apply anything.
func TestDeferIsNotBlock(t *testing.T) {
p, _ := Compute(sp(), "sha256:x", &state.Resolved{}, fake{})
if p.Blocked() {
t.Fatal("a deferral must not block the plan")
}
f := fake{botExists: true, usernames: map[int64]string{-200: "someoneelse"}}
p2, _ := Compute(sp(), "sha256:x", provisioned(true), f)
if !p2.Blocked() {
t.Fatal("real drift must block")
}
}
// Once the test channel is verified, the public channel stops being deferred.
func TestVerifiedTestChannelReleasesPublic(t *testing.T) {
f := fake{botExists: true, usernames: map[int64]string{-200: "hallofhelix"}}
p, _ := Compute(sp(), "sha256:x", provisioned(true), f)
if find(p, Defer, "channel.public") != nil {
t.Errorf("public should no longer be deferred:\n%s", p.Render())
}
}
// The plan must not promise an action apply will silently skip. The avatar is
// the live case: /setuserpic needs an upload that is not implemented, so the
// plan defers it with an explanation instead of claiming a create.
func TestAvatarIsDeferredNotPromised(t *testing.T) {
s := sp()
s.Bot.Avatar = "presence/assets/avatar.png"
p, _ := Compute(s, "sha256:x", &state.Resolved{}, fake{})
if find(p, Create, "bot.avatar") != nil {
t.Fatal("plan promised an avatar create that apply does not perform")
}
a := find(p, Defer, "bot.avatar")
if a == nil {
t.Fatalf("expected the avatar to be deferred:\n%s", p.Render())
}
if !strings.Contains(a.Why, "setuserpic") {
t.Errorf("deferral should say how to do it by hand: %q", a.Why)
}
}