tegwick
10018a99b6
Go, per the toolchain decision. cmd/provision with internal/spec, internal/state and internal/plan; plan computation is pure and takes live observation through an interface, so the refusal logic is testable without a Telegram account. It runs against the real campaign spec today. Separates two refusals the design had treated as one. A deferral is the design working -- the public channel waiting on a checked rendering, normal on every first run. A block is the world disagreeing with the state file: drifted rights, a taken-over username, a bot that is no longer reachable. Collapsed together, a first run could never apply anything, because it always defers the public channel. The rights clamp and the private/public username rule are enforced in Go and asserted against the same cases the JSON schema rejects, since mirroring the schema in code is a drift risk worth a test rather than a comment. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0172sgCZEEDJcnQmr4SGDvKa Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 1361245@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: b3b428ef-f3e6-4688-b091-01f71461d66a
3 lines
259 B
Text
3 lines
259 B
Text
gopkg.in/check.v1 v0.0.0-20161208181325-20d25e280405/go.mod h1:Co6ibVJAznAaIkqp8huTwlJQCZ016jof/cbN4VW5Yz0=
|
|
gopkg.in/yaml.v3 v3.0.1 h1:fxVm/GzAzEWqLHuvctI91KS9hhNmmWOoWu0XTYJS7CA=
|
|
gopkg.in/yaml.v3 v3.0.1/go.mod h1:K4uyk7z7BCEPqu6E+C64Yfv1cQ7kz7rIZviUmN+EgEM=
|