fluid-telegram/internal/plan/plan_test.go
tegwick 10018a99b6 Implement provision plan: spec, resolved state, and the diff
Go, per the toolchain decision. cmd/provision with internal/spec,
internal/state and internal/plan; plan computation is pure and takes live
observation through an interface, so the refusal logic is testable without
a Telegram account. It runs against the real campaign spec today.

Separates two refusals the design had treated as one. A deferral is the
design working -- the public channel waiting on a checked rendering, normal
on every first run. A block is the world disagreeing with the state file:
drifted rights, a taken-over username, a bot that is no longer reachable.
Collapsed together, a first run could never apply anything, because it
always defers the public channel.

The rights clamp and the private/public username rule are enforced in Go
and asserted against the same cases the JSON schema rejects, since mirroring
the schema in code is a drift risk worth a test rather than a comment.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0172sgCZEEDJcnQmr4SGDvKa

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 1361245@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: b3b428ef-f3e6-4688-b091-01f71461d66a
2026-09-04 21:25:49 +02:00

213 lines
6.8 KiB
Go

package plan
import (
"strings"
"testing"
"time"
"github.com/tegwick/fluid-telegram/internal/spec"
"github.com/tegwick/fluid-telegram/internal/state"
)
type fake struct {
botExists bool
rights map[int64][]string
usernames map[int64]string
}
func (f fake) BotExists(string) (bool, error) { return f.botExists, nil }
func (f fake) ChannelAdminRights(id int64) ([]string, error) {
if r, ok := f.rights[id]; ok {
return r, nil
}
return []string{spec.PostMessages}, nil
}
func (f fake) ChannelUsername(id int64) (string, error) { return f.usernames[id], nil }
func sp() *spec.Presence {
return &spec.Presence{
SchemaVersion: "0.1", Campaign: "hall-of-helix", Interface: "i",
Bot: spec.Bot{Name: "HelixForge", UsernamePreference: []string{"HelixForgeBot"}},
Channels: map[string]spec.Channel{
spec.Test: {Title: "t", Visibility: spec.Private},
spec.Live: {Title: "p", Visibility: spec.Public, UsernamePreference: []string{"hallofhelix"}},
},
}
}
func find(p *Plan, kind Kind, target string) *Action {
for i := range p.Actions {
if p.Actions[i].Kind == kind && p.Actions[i].Target == target {
return &p.Actions[i]
}
}
return nil
}
// First run: everything is created, and the public channel is blocked because
// no rendering has been checked yet.
func TestFirstRunCreatesAndBlocksPublic(t *testing.T) {
p, err := Compute(sp(), "sha256:x", &state.Resolved{}, fake{})
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if find(p, Attempt, "bot") == nil {
t.Error("expected a bot registration attempt")
}
if find(p, Create, "channel.test") == nil {
t.Error("expected the test channel to be created")
}
if find(p, Defer, "channel.public") == nil {
t.Error("public channel must be deferred until the test channel is verified")
}
// A first run is not an error state. The bot and the test channel must still
// be creatable while the public channel waits.
if p.Blocked() {
t.Errorf("a first run should not block:\n%s", p.Render())
}
if p.Empty() {
t.Error("a first run has work to do")
}
}
func provisioned(withTestPublication bool) *state.Resolved {
rs := &state.Resolved{
Campaign: "hall-of-helix",
Bot: state.Bot{Username: "HelixForgeBot", ID: 42},
Channels: map[string]state.Channel{
spec.Test: {ChatID: -100, AdminRights: []string{spec.PostMessages}},
spec.Live: {ChatID: -200, Username: "hallofhelix", AdminRights: []string{spec.PostMessages}},
},
}
if withTestPublication {
now := time.Now()
c := rs.Channels[spec.Test]
c.TestPublicationAt = &now
rs.Channels[spec.Test] = c
}
return rs
}
// Converged: a second run over an unchanged spec proposes nothing but the
// idempotent profile reassertion.
func TestConvergedRunIsQuiet(t *testing.T) {
f := fake{botExists: true, usernames: map[int64]string{-200: "hallofhelix"}}
p, err := Compute(sp(), "sha256:x", provisioned(true), f)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if p.Blocked() {
t.Fatalf("converged plan should not block:\n%s", p.Render())
}
for _, a := range p.Actions {
if a.Kind == Create || a.Kind == Attempt {
t.Errorf("unexpected %s of %s on a converged presence", a.Kind, a.Target)
}
}
}
// Widened rights are a refusal, not a repair.
func TestWidenedRightsBlock(t *testing.T) {
f := fake{botExists: true, usernames: map[int64]string{-200: "hallofhelix"},
rights: map[int64][]string{-200: {spec.PostMessages, "can_delete_messages"}}}
p, _ := Compute(sp(), "sha256:x", provisioned(true), f)
a := find(p, Block, "channel.public.admin")
if a == nil {
t.Fatalf("widened rights must block:\n%s", p.Render())
}
if !strings.Contains(a.Why, "not allowed to exercise") {
t.Errorf("block should explain why: %q", a.Why)
}
}
// A demoted bot blocks too -- losing the right is as much a drift as gaining one.
func TestLostRightsBlock(t *testing.T) {
f := fake{botExists: true, usernames: map[int64]string{-200: "hallofhelix"},
rights: map[int64][]string{-100: {}}}
p, _ := Compute(sp(), "sha256:x", provisioned(true), f)
if find(p, Block, "channel.test.admin") == nil {
t.Fatalf("a demoted bot must block:\n%s", p.Render())
}
}
// A username that changed underneath us is not reconciled.
func TestUsernameTakeoverBlocks(t *testing.T) {
f := fake{botExists: true, usernames: map[int64]string{-200: "someoneelse"}}
p, _ := Compute(sp(), "sha256:x", provisioned(true), f)
if find(p, Block, "channel.public.username") == nil {
t.Fatalf("a changed username must block:\n%s", p.Render())
}
}
// A missing bot blocks rather than being re-created, which would orphan the
// token already in OpenBao.
func TestMissingBotBlocks(t *testing.T) {
f := fake{botExists: false}
p, _ := Compute(sp(), "sha256:x", provisioned(true), f)
if find(p, Block, "bot") == nil {
t.Fatalf("an unreachable bot must block:\n%s", p.Render())
}
}
// Removing a channel from the spec warns; it never deletes.
func TestRemovedChannelWarnsNeverDeletes(t *testing.T) {
s := sp()
delete(s.Channels, spec.Live)
f := fake{botExists: true}
p, _ := Compute(s, "sha256:x", provisioned(true), f)
a := find(p, Warn, "channel.public")
if a == nil {
t.Fatalf("expected a warning:\n%s", p.Render())
}
for _, act := range p.Actions {
if strings.Contains(strings.ToLower(act.Detail), "delete") && act.Kind != Warn {
t.Errorf("plan proposed a deletion: %+v", act)
}
}
}
// Pointing a state file at a different campaign is a mistake, not a rename.
func TestCampaignMismatchBlocks(t *testing.T) {
rs := provisioned(true)
rs.Campaign = "some-other-campaign"
p, _ := Compute(sp(), "sha256:x", rs, fake{botExists: true})
if find(p, Block, "campaign") == nil {
t.Fatalf("campaign mismatch must block:\n%s", p.Render())
}
}
func TestRenderShowsRefusalsFirst(t *testing.T) {
rs := provisioned(true)
rs.Campaign = "some-other-campaign"
p, _ := Compute(sp(), "sha256:x", rs, fake{botExists: true})
out := p.Render()
if !strings.Contains(out, "nothing will be applied") {
t.Errorf("a blocked plan should say so:\n%s", out)
}
if !strings.Contains(out, "BLOCK") {
t.Error("expected a BLOCK in the render")
}
}
// A deferral is not a block: the two must not collapse into each other, or a
// first run can never apply anything.
func TestDeferIsNotBlock(t *testing.T) {
p, _ := Compute(sp(), "sha256:x", &state.Resolved{}, fake{})
if p.Blocked() {
t.Fatal("a deferral must not block the plan")
}
f := fake{botExists: true, usernames: map[int64]string{-200: "someoneelse"}}
p2, _ := Compute(sp(), "sha256:x", provisioned(true), f)
if !p2.Blocked() {
t.Fatal("real drift must block")
}
}
// Once the test channel is verified, the public channel stops being deferred.
func TestVerifiedTestChannelReleasesPublic(t *testing.T) {
f := fake{botExists: true, usernames: map[int64]string{-200: "hallofhelix"}}
p, _ := Compute(sp(), "sha256:x", provisioned(true), f)
if find(p, Defer, "channel.public") != nil {
t.Errorf("public should no longer be deferred:\n%s", p.Render())
}
}