tegwick
3aa8cb7eaf
The channel publishes a post written from a hall entry -- condensed, personal, reach-optimized -- not the entry itself. That changes what this interface is for and where its boundary sits. Composition is deliberately outside the interface. Composing is a probabilistic editorial task, and Blueprint 48.1 forbids an LLM in the mandatory request path, so an interface that composed on demand would be non-deterministic exactly where determinism is the whole claim. It is also editorial: a post speaks about a named person's work in HelixForge's voice, and a review step inside the request path is a review step nobody performs. The contract now takes a composed post with a required reviewer, a cited source entry and a consent basis. A post carrying none of those is refused. Absence of objection is not consent, and in an audit trail an unfaithful post looks exactly like a faithful one -- the defence is that a human read it, the source is named, and both are recorded. The first experiment is rebuilt accordingly. The old competition asked how to fit a whole entry into Telegram; that question no longer exists. The new one asks whether the portrait earns the 3072 characters of caption limit it costs, which is a delivery question this interface actually owns. Competition over editorial voice belongs to the campaign and runs on the per-variant engagement this interface reports. Adds T05b (composition and review), T05c (consent basis for the 94 existing participants, blocking public publication) and T11 (extracting the campaign into pr-hall-of-helix). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014KmVxhJ35tCo7rE7UnLwWu Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 1116572@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 8ba9bb93-a72a-4883-b189-2499cce5c400
122 lines
3.5 KiB
YAML
122 lines
3.5 KiB
YAML
fluid_hypothesis:
|
|
schema_version: "0.1"
|
|
|
|
id: "H-tg-visual"
|
|
interface_id: "helix-forge-telegram-publishing"
|
|
state: "DRAFT"
|
|
|
|
title: "A post carrying its portrait reaches further than text alone"
|
|
|
|
observation:
|
|
summary: >
|
|
72 of 94 hall entries already carry a generated portrait, produced from the entry's own visual prompt. Telegram renders images inline and its feed is scanned rather than read, so a post with a portrait occupies more of a scrolling reader's attention than one without.
|
|
evidence_refs:
|
|
- "measurement:hall-of-helix/visuals@2026-09-04"
|
|
- "pressure:P-register"
|
|
affected_cohorts:
|
|
- "telegram-subscribers"
|
|
|
|
pressure:
|
|
classes:
|
|
- "repeated_expectation_mismatch"
|
|
pressure_refs:
|
|
- "P-register"
|
|
severity: 0.6
|
|
confidence: 0.7
|
|
|
|
explanation:
|
|
claim: >
|
|
Reach in a scanned feed is won by stopping the scroll. The portraits are already made, already tied to the specific person and stretch of work, and cost nothing further to attach. If they do not measurably help, the effort of producing them for publication is not justified and the campaign should know that.
|
|
reach:
|
|
score: 0.4
|
|
explains:
|
|
- "P-register"
|
|
notes: >
|
|
Narrow but clean. It settles one delivery question decisively, and the
|
|
answer transfers to fluid-x and fluid-substack, which face the same
|
|
question under different feeds.
|
|
|
|
proposed_adaptation:
|
|
class: "presentation"
|
|
summary: >
|
|
Publish the post with its portrait attached as a photo message, with the post body as the caption.
|
|
implementation_scope: "interface_only"
|
|
|
|
backend_requirements:
|
|
required: false
|
|
requirement_refs: []
|
|
|
|
expected_outcomes:
|
|
- metric: "engagement_rate"
|
|
cohort: "telegram-subscribers"
|
|
target: 0.05
|
|
direction: "higher"
|
|
- metric: "source_link_rate"
|
|
cohort: "telegram-subscribers"
|
|
target: 0.02
|
|
direction: "higher"
|
|
|
|
guardrails:
|
|
- metric: "unreviewed_publication"
|
|
operator: "=="
|
|
threshold: false
|
|
- metric: "missing_source_attribution"
|
|
operator: "=="
|
|
threshold: false
|
|
- metric: "missing_subject_consent"
|
|
operator: "=="
|
|
threshold: false
|
|
- metric: "error_rate"
|
|
operator: "<="
|
|
threshold: 0.01
|
|
|
|
fitness_dimensions:
|
|
expected:
|
|
client_utility: 0.2
|
|
discoverability: 0.5
|
|
simplicity: -0.1
|
|
correctness: 0.0
|
|
security: 0.0
|
|
|
|
complexity:
|
|
expected_delta:
|
|
operation_count: 0
|
|
concept_count: 0
|
|
cognitive_load: 0.1
|
|
score: 0.15
|
|
|
|
risk:
|
|
level: "LOW"
|
|
reasons:
|
|
- "presentation only; no contract, authorization or consent change"
|
|
- "Telegram caps a photo caption at 1024 characters, a quarter of the text limit; this arm constrains the composition it carries"
|
|
|
|
economics:
|
|
estimated_experiment_cost: 0.0
|
|
estimated_implementation_cost: 0.0
|
|
currency: "EUR"
|
|
expected_value_class: "MEDIUM"
|
|
|
|
learning_value:
|
|
score: 0.7
|
|
notes: >
|
|
Settles whether the portraits earn their place in publication, and the answer transfers to every other channel HelixForge publishes to.
|
|
|
|
success_criteria:
|
|
expression: >
|
|
engagement_rate >= 0.05 AND no guardrail violation
|
|
|
|
failure_criteria:
|
|
expression: >
|
|
any hard guardrail violation
|
|
OR engagement_rate at or below the rival arm over the same window
|
|
|
|
competition:
|
|
group_id: "CG-tg-delivery"
|
|
alternatives:
|
|
- "H-tg-textonly"
|
|
|
|
outcome:
|
|
status: null
|
|
summary: null
|
|
evidence_refs: []
|