35 lines
922 B
Markdown
35 lines
922 B
Markdown
|
# Source review — <title>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Status: queued | extracted | reviewed
|
||
|
|
Reviewer and review date:
|
||
|
|
Research question / hypothesis:
|
||
|
|
Potential disconfirming evidence:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Source identity
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- Author / publisher:
|
||
|
|
- Title:
|
||
|
|
- URL or bibliographic locator:
|
||
|
|
- Publication date / version:
|
||
|
|
- Access date:
|
||
|
|
- Primary or secondary source; independence from other sources:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Claims
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
| Label | Source claim (paraphrase) | Section/page/revision | Assumptions | Our interpretation |
|
||
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||
|
|
| C01 | | | | |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Candidate patterns and forces
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Link candidates and explain competing forces, recurrence and resulting contexts.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Counterevidence and limits
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Separate observed counterexamples from hypothetical ones. Record inaccessible evidence.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Conclusion and next action
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Support, revise, reject or defer the hypothesis; explain why. Link the question
|
||
|
|
ledger, candidate/source catalogs and any follow-up work record.
|