Incorporate submitted pilot review and adjudicate four score differences
Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a0cffe-206f-7323-89d3-b20ca4cf4bf9
This commit is contained in:
parent
629bc2e880
commit
21030784b1
13 changed files with 659 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -87,3 +87,8 @@ scoring found 21/24 obligations met with named patterns versus 19/24 with equiva
|
|||
prose, and two unsupported claims in each. Inconclusive; human review pending.
|
||||
Retain all eight hypotheses, no new pattern or promotion. Do not mistake a small
|
||||
presentation difference for proof of recurrence or improved architecture decisions.
|
||||
|
||||
2026-09-26 adjudication: the user-submitted model-assisted worksheet supports four
|
||||
rating corrections; both presentations now meet 18/24 obligations. The original
|
||||
21/24 versus 19/24 figures above are historical. [Adjudication](../evaluations/language-pilot-01/submitted-review-01/adjudication.md)
|
||||
retains all eight hypotheses and the unfulfilled independent-human evidence gate.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue