Retain replication-03 execution outputs: 12/12 completed (FEP-WP-0009-T02)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 182330@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 242866cf-789d-4e24-ac5e-0a1d7b47a701
This commit is contained in:
parent
3b2df99fe1
commit
211f8fc4b2
50 changed files with 1090 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"executed_at": "2026-10-20",
|
||||
"authorization": "Owner, 2026-10-20: 'Allow the port-forward and run with 12 calls'",
|
||||
"endpoint": "http://127.0.0.1:18081 via kubectl port-forward to activity-core/llm-connect (stopped after the run)",
|
||||
"preflight": "health_ok, zero attempts reserved",
|
||||
"sessions": 12,
|
||||
"completed": 12,
|
||||
"failed": 0,
|
||||
"retries": 0,
|
||||
"models": {
|
||||
"google/gemini-2.5-flash": 12
|
||||
},
|
||||
"providers": {
|
||||
"openrouter": 12
|
||||
},
|
||||
"profile": [
|
||||
"custodian-triage-balanced"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"effective_temperature": [
|
||||
0.2
|
||||
],
|
||||
"effective_max_tokens": [
|
||||
1400
|
||||
],
|
||||
"finish_reasons": {
|
||||
"stop": 12
|
||||
},
|
||||
"prompt_tokens": 13494,
|
||||
"completion_tokens": 2651,
|
||||
"provider_reported_cost_usd": 0.010676,
|
||||
"elapsed_seconds_total": 28.583,
|
||||
"output_words": {
|
||||
"min": 138,
|
||||
"max": 220,
|
||||
"over_220": 0
|
||||
},
|
||||
"limits": [
|
||||
"Aggregate only; per-session condition mapping stays in raw/ and assignment.json and must not be opened by reviewers before scoring.",
|
||||
"Provider-reported cost is the receipt value, not an invoice."
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
|||
Here's a review of the proposed frontend decision based on the provided reference:
|
||||
|
||||
* **Operation and Visible State:** The application should distinguish between the locally saved, un-uploaded content and any current authoritative state. The agent's "local save" is not remote acceptance, and the explicit rejection means the proposed changes are not authoritative. The editor should reflect this divergence, showing the agent's work as distinct from the rejected upload status.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Information and Policy Boundaries:** The product rule for "recoverable rejected edits" is insufficient. The absence of explicit policy for local viewing, retention, export, or deletion after access withdrawal means these actions are undefined, not implicitly permitted or forbidden. Export requires separate permission, which is currently missing.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Recovery Action and Rejected Alternative:** The suggestion to keep the editor open indefinitely and export a recovery archive is a workaround for missing policy. A more robust recovery action would involve preserving the agent's work with a distinct identity and provenance, as policy permits, rather than relying on an open application state.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Missing Contract:** There is no defined retention or failure scope for the locally saved content, especially concerning off-device recovery. The application lacks a clear contract for how to handle this "recoverable" content when access is withdrawn, including its eventual deletion or transfer.
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
|||
1. The application should maintain the agent's draft as separate from any authoritative observation. The local save acknowledgment confirms the draft's persistence, but does not imply remote acceptance or retention guarantees beyond the device.
|
||||
|
||||
2. The policy for rejected edits only guarantees recoverability, not continued access, viewing, or export after access withdrawal. The absence of explicit rules for these scenarios means they are unknown, not implicitly permitted.
|
||||
|
||||
3. The application should transition the rejected upload to a state where the draft is preserved locally, but not actively synchronized. Exporting a recovery archive is a separate action requiring explicit permission, which is currently undefined.
|
||||
|
||||
4. A clear contract is missing for how local drafts are handled when access is withdrawn, specifically regarding continued viewing, export, and deletion. This ambiguity needs resolution to define appropriate next steps for the agent's data.
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
|||
* **Operation and Visible State:** Order A is accepted. Order B is an unsubmitted local draft. Reversal C's outcome is unknown due to a lost response. The spinner's disappearance only indicates browser wait cancellation, not rejection of C.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Information and Policy Boundaries:** The system has an authenticated receipt for A's acceptance. The status of C is ambiguous; its lookup, replay, retention, and authorization semantics are undefined, preventing assumptions about its effect.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Recovery Action and Rejected Alternative:** The user needs to reconcile the unknown status of C. A blind retry of C is inappropriate without understanding its identity and idempotency. The system should not assume C failed or succeeded.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Missing Contract:** The lack of documented semantics for C's operation identity, retention, and authorization means the system cannot reliably determine its state or offer appropriate recovery actions like lookup or replay.
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
|
|||
1. The accepted order A is a stable state, while the unsubmitted replacement B is a separate, unfinished proposal. Hiding the spinner and canceling the browser wait for C does not alter the status of A or B.
|
||||
2. The service's lack of documentation for C's lookup, replay, retention, or authorization means its policy boundaries are unknown. This prevents assuming any specific outcome for C, including successful reversal.
|
||||
3. Since C's response was lost and its semantics are undefined, its status is unknown. Recovery actions for C are limited without documented replay or lookup capabilities. The alternative of assuming C's success is rejected due to lack of evidence.
|
||||
4. A critical missing contract is the explicit definition of C's operation identity, retention window, and authority scope. This absence prevents reliable reconciliation or determination of C's effect on A.
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
|||
* **Operation and Visible State:** The system must atomically commit the chosen revision `c`, the new operation `Q`, and the non-retryable status of `P` within a single recoverable transaction. This ensures that `P` is not reactivated after a restart if the process dies between transactions.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Information and Policy Boundaries:** The scenario highlights a missing contract regarding the receiver's version and ancestry enforcement. Without this, the system cannot guarantee that an already transmitted `P` will be correctly handled by the receiver, even if marked non-retryable locally.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Recovery Action and Rejected Alternative:** The proposed correction prevents `P` from becoming active again locally after a crash, addressing the risk of re-transmitting a superseded operation. The alternative of marking `P` non-retryable in a separate transaction is rejected due to the vulnerability to process death.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Missing Contract:** The absence of a documented contract for the receiver's version/ancestry enforcement means the system cannot rely on the receiver to correctly handle `P` if it arrives after `Q` or `c`, or if it's a stale version. This requires external reconciliation or a defined receiver policy.
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
|||
Here's a review of the proposed frontend decision:
|
||||
|
||||
* **Operation and Visible State:** The proposed approach risks a race condition where the system might attempt to re-process the original pending upload (P) after a crash, even though a new revision (c) and operation (Q) have been recorded. The user's chosen revision (c) and the new operation (Q) should be committed atomically with the marking of P as non-retryable.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Information and Policy Boundaries:** The scenario implies a local decision to mark P as non-retryable, but this doesn't guarantee the remote receiver will honor it. The lack of documented receiver version/ancestry enforcement means the frontend cannot assume the remote will reject a late-arriving P.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Recovery Action and Rejected Alternative:** The minimal correction is to commit the new revision (c), the new operation (Q), and the non-retryable status of P within a single, recoverable transaction. This prevents P from being re-activated after a crash. The alternative of marking P non-retryable in a separate, later transaction is rejected due to the risk of re-transmission.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Missing Contract:** There is no explicit contract for how the remote receiver handles conflicting or superseded operations. The frontend needs to account for the possibility that a late-arriving P might still be accepted by the server, potentially overwriting the user's chosen revision (c) or creating further divergence.
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
|||
* **Operation and Visible State:** The tool's report of surviving a process restart and keeping local copies indicates a "Local Draft State" and "Local Commit Boundary" for the scene and pending queue. The user sees a restored state after a restart.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Information and Policy Boundaries:** The off-device archive's guarantees are unknown. The reference states that "A missing policy is unknown, not an unconditional retention or deletion rule." Without checked key availability, deletion retention, and restoration of pending operation identities, the archive's utility is undefined.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Recovery Action and Rejected Alternative:** The scenario implicitly rejects the alternative of having no local recovery. However, the "Local Commit Boundary" mechanism states that "Untested recovery is unknown rather than impossible." The team needs to test the off-device archive's recovery.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Missing Contract:** There is no established contract for off-device recovery. "Same-device copies and synchronization do not establish independent backup." The reference requires defining "retention/failure scope and test clean-store restoration...before promising off-device recovery."
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
|||
Here's a review of the proposed frontend decision based on the provided reference:
|
||||
|
||||
* **Operation and Visible State:** The tool separates the current scene from pending uploads and a conflict copy. This aligns with keeping observations and unfinished proposals distinct, and preserving alternatives. However, the "conflict copy" implies divergence detection, but its resolution mechanism and whether it's presented to the user are unclear.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Information and Policy Boundaries:** The tool's local copies and archive are intended for recovery, but their retention, access, and deletion policies are undefined. The reference emphasizes that missing policy means unknown, not unconditional retention or deletion, and that recoverability isn't permission to retain restricted content.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Recovery Action and Rejected Alternative:** The tool claims restart-safe offline save and local copies. However, the reference states that untested recovery is unknown, not impossible. The alternative of relying on an unchecked off-device archive is insufficient, as its restoration of pending identities and content is unverified.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Missing Contract:** There's no defined retention/failure scope for the local copies or the off-device archive. The reference explicitly requires defining this scope and testing clean-store restoration, including pending identities, before promising off-device recovery. Same-device copies are not independent backup.
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
|||
* The editor's operation and visible state are ambiguous. The original payload and identity K are retained, but the remote status is unknown. The editor cannot distinguish between an unaccepted operation and one whose history has expired.
|
||||
|
||||
* Information and policy boundaries are crossed. The editor's retention of K exceeds the remote deduplication guarantee. The service's response does not provide clear information about the fate of K, creating an information boundary issue.
|
||||
|
||||
* The recovery action is to resend K or create a fresh identity. The rejected alternative is an automatic duplicate-free recovery plan, which is not feasible due to the ambiguity of the remote state and the expired deduplication window.
|
||||
|
||||
* A missing contract exists for the remote service's behavior regarding expired history. The service does not explicitly state whether "no record" implies non-acceptance or simply expired retention of the operation's history.
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
|||
* **Operation and Visible State:** The editor retains the original payload and operation identity, which is good for tracking. However, the system's visible state regarding the operation's acceptance is ambiguous due to the lost response and unclear lookup result.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Information and Policy Boundaries:** The receiver's deduplication guarantee has a strict 16-hour time limit, which has been exceeded. The service's response for "no record" lacks clarity on whether it implies non-acceptance or expired history, creating an information boundary issue.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Recovery Action and Rejected Alternative:** Resending the original identity K is risky due to the expired deduplication window, potentially leading to duplicates. Creating a fresh identity is safer for avoiding duplicates, but it doesn't confirm the status of the original submission. An automatic recovery plan is not feasible without clearer server state.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Missing Contract:** There's a missing contract for how the service communicates the definitive status of an operation after its deduplication window expires, especially when the initial response is lost. This ambiguity prevents a reliable automatic recovery strategy.
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
|||
* The accepted batch import `I` should be treated as complete, and the failure to refresh visible cards does not invalidate its acceptance. The new card draft `D` must be preserved separately from any refresh attempts.
|
||||
|
||||
* The authenticated receipt for `I` establishes its acceptance. The lack of an ordering contract for the cache read means its opaque version labels cannot be used to infer the current state or to justify re-running `I`.
|
||||
|
||||
* The correct recovery action is to refresh the affected observations while keeping the unfinished draft `D` separate. Rerunning `I` is an incorrect action as it was already accepted. Replacing the editor from the cache is also incorrect due to the lack of a read-after-write contract.
|
||||
|
||||
* The proposal is missing a contract for how to handle divergent observations after an accepted operation, specifically how to reconcile the visible cards with the accepted import `I` when a refresh fails and a background cache provides inconsistent data.
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
|||
1. **Operation and Visible State:** The batch import was accepted, but the visible cards are not refreshed. A new card draft is in progress. The cache read provides opaque version labels without ordering guarantees.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Information and Policy Boundaries:** The acceptance of the import is distinct from the freshness of the view. A failed refresh does not invalidate the accepted operation. The new card draft is separate from the import and its refresh.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Recovery Action and Rejected Alternative:** Refresh the affected observations after the import's acceptance, while keeping the unfinished card draft separate. Do not rerun the import or replace the editor from the cache, as this would discard the in-progress draft and potentially re-introduce already accepted work.
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Missing Contract:** There is no documented read-after-write or server ordering contract, nor is there an authoritative result or subscription mechanism to avoid a separate fetch for current data.
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
|||
1. The application should maintain the agent's draft as separate from any authoritative observation. The local save acknowledgment confirms the draft's persistence, but does not imply remote acceptance or retention guarantees beyond the device.
|
||||
|
||||
2. The policy for rejected edits only guarantees recoverability, not continued access, viewing, or export after access withdrawal. The absence of explicit rules for these scenarios means they are unknown, not implicitly permitted.
|
||||
|
||||
3. The application should transition the rejected upload to a state where the draft is preserved locally, but not actively synchronized. Exporting a recovery archive is a separate action requiring explicit permission, which is currently undefined.
|
||||
|
||||
4. A clear contract is missing for how local drafts are handled when access is withdrawn, specifically regarding continued viewing, export, and deletion. This ambiguity needs resolution to define appropriate next steps for the agent's data.
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"run": "r01",
|
||||
"scenario": "R03-S01",
|
||||
"condition": "patterns",
|
||||
"blind_id": "R03-S01-V",
|
||||
"attempts_reserved": 1,
|
||||
"prompt_sha256": "91a50e9c1bcb85b650ca7c51155d7c8aed3d8a95f0375a3c87fbcc735b10dde4",
|
||||
"freeze_sha256": "8dfa22d5e03657aaf5d4c3aeb869f7d352ae606842ce36f0576b465d729529be",
|
||||
"max_output_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"endpoint": "http://127.0.0.1:18081",
|
||||
"config": {
|
||||
"model_name": "custodian-triage-balanced",
|
||||
"temperature": 0.2,
|
||||
"max_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"model_params": {},
|
||||
"max_depth": 3,
|
||||
"skip_if_exists": true,
|
||||
"timeout_seconds": 300
|
||||
},
|
||||
"status": "completed",
|
||||
"output_sha256": "f542eb0b1aa37db186536876dcd638f7a55980a69b997d4d051a5d203b107725",
|
||||
"output_words": 139,
|
||||
"elapsed_seconds": 2.714,
|
||||
"responses": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"stage": "decision-review",
|
||||
"model": "google/gemini-2.5-flash",
|
||||
"usage": {
|
||||
"prompt_tokens": 1130,
|
||||
"completion_tokens": 176,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 1306
|
||||
},
|
||||
"finish_reason": "stop",
|
||||
"provider": "openrouter",
|
||||
"response_id": "gen-1792448559-yyGFuEbgRpDytkurolTh",
|
||||
"latency_seconds": 2.754,
|
||||
"profile": "custodian-triage-balanced",
|
||||
"profile_model": "google/gemini-2.5-flash",
|
||||
"profile_provider": "openrouter",
|
||||
"diagnostics": {
|
||||
"available": true,
|
||||
"effective_settings": {
|
||||
"temperature": 0.2,
|
||||
"max_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"reasoning_effort_present": false,
|
||||
"reasoning_present": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"provider_usage": {
|
||||
"prompt_tokens": 1130,
|
||||
"completion_tokens": 176,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 1306,
|
||||
"cost": 0.000779,
|
||||
"completion_tokens_details": {
|
||||
"reasoning_tokens": 0
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"content_characters": 971,
|
||||
"content_sha256": "f542eb0b1aa37db186536876dcd638f7a55980a69b997d4d051a5d203b107725"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"run": "r01",
|
||||
"scenario": "R03-S01",
|
||||
"condition": "patterns",
|
||||
"blind_id": "R03-S01-V",
|
||||
"attempts_reserved": 1,
|
||||
"prompt_sha256": "91a50e9c1bcb85b650ca7c51155d7c8aed3d8a95f0375a3c87fbcc735b10dde4",
|
||||
"freeze_sha256": "8dfa22d5e03657aaf5d4c3aeb869f7d352ae606842ce36f0576b465d729529be",
|
||||
"max_output_tokens": 1400
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
|||
Here's a review of the proposed frontend decision based on the provided reference:
|
||||
|
||||
* **Operation and Visible State:** The application should distinguish between the locally saved, un-uploaded content and any current authoritative state. The agent's "local save" is not remote acceptance, and the explicit rejection means the proposed changes are not authoritative. The editor should reflect this divergence, showing the agent's work as distinct from the rejected upload status.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Information and Policy Boundaries:** The product rule for "recoverable rejected edits" is insufficient. The absence of explicit policy for local viewing, retention, export, or deletion after access withdrawal means these actions are undefined, not implicitly permitted or forbidden. Export requires separate permission, which is currently missing.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Recovery Action and Rejected Alternative:** The suggestion to keep the editor open indefinitely and export a recovery archive is a workaround for missing policy. A more robust recovery action would involve preserving the agent's work with a distinct identity and provenance, as policy permits, rather than relying on an open application state.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Missing Contract:** There is no defined retention or failure scope for the locally saved content, especially concerning off-device recovery. The application lacks a clear contract for how to handle this "recoverable" content when access is withdrawn, including its eventual deletion or transfer.
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"run": "r02",
|
||||
"scenario": "R03-S01",
|
||||
"condition": "prose",
|
||||
"blind_id": "R03-S01-U",
|
||||
"attempts_reserved": 1,
|
||||
"prompt_sha256": "146a74fc4e3adafd8039553a3676102132551faa8168a5a8fcb401d2b205272c",
|
||||
"freeze_sha256": "8dfa22d5e03657aaf5d4c3aeb869f7d352ae606842ce36f0576b465d729529be",
|
||||
"max_output_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"endpoint": "http://127.0.0.1:18081",
|
||||
"config": {
|
||||
"model_name": "custodian-triage-balanced",
|
||||
"temperature": 0.2,
|
||||
"max_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"model_params": {},
|
||||
"max_depth": 3,
|
||||
"skip_if_exists": true,
|
||||
"timeout_seconds": 300
|
||||
},
|
||||
"status": "completed",
|
||||
"output_sha256": "52978c49a3cd525265f0cd9bd805479c362e35e20a5bbf4fa484eaa452bae631",
|
||||
"output_words": 212,
|
||||
"elapsed_seconds": 2.923,
|
||||
"responses": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"stage": "decision-review",
|
||||
"model": "google/gemini-2.5-flash",
|
||||
"usage": {
|
||||
"prompt_tokens": 1129,
|
||||
"completion_tokens": 271,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 1400
|
||||
},
|
||||
"finish_reason": "stop",
|
||||
"provider": "openrouter",
|
||||
"response_id": "gen-1792448562-BW9cBAcOCsaN1cYJhriV",
|
||||
"latency_seconds": 2.947,
|
||||
"profile": "custodian-triage-balanced",
|
||||
"profile_model": "google/gemini-2.5-flash",
|
||||
"profile_provider": "openrouter",
|
||||
"diagnostics": {
|
||||
"available": true,
|
||||
"effective_settings": {
|
||||
"temperature": 0.2,
|
||||
"max_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"reasoning_effort_present": false,
|
||||
"reasoning_present": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"provider_usage": {
|
||||
"prompt_tokens": 1129,
|
||||
"completion_tokens": 271,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"cost": 0.0010162,
|
||||
"completion_tokens_details": {
|
||||
"reasoning_tokens": 0
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"content_characters": 1489,
|
||||
"content_sha256": "52978c49a3cd525265f0cd9bd805479c362e35e20a5bbf4fa484eaa452bae631"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"run": "r02",
|
||||
"scenario": "R03-S01",
|
||||
"condition": "prose",
|
||||
"blind_id": "R03-S01-U",
|
||||
"attempts_reserved": 1,
|
||||
"prompt_sha256": "146a74fc4e3adafd8039553a3676102132551faa8168a5a8fcb401d2b205272c",
|
||||
"freeze_sha256": "8dfa22d5e03657aaf5d4c3aeb869f7d352ae606842ce36f0576b465d729529be",
|
||||
"max_output_tokens": 1400
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
|
|||
1. The accepted order A is a stable state, while the unsubmitted replacement B is a separate, unfinished proposal. Hiding the spinner and canceling the browser wait for C does not alter the status of A or B.
|
||||
2. The service's lack of documentation for C's lookup, replay, retention, or authorization means its policy boundaries are unknown. This prevents assuming any specific outcome for C, including successful reversal.
|
||||
3. Since C's response was lost and its semantics are undefined, its status is unknown. Recovery actions for C are limited without documented replay or lookup capabilities. The alternative of assuming C's success is rejected due to lack of evidence.
|
||||
4. A critical missing contract is the explicit definition of C's operation identity, retention window, and authority scope. This absence prevents reliable reconciliation or determination of C's effect on A.
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"run": "r03",
|
||||
"scenario": "R03-S02",
|
||||
"condition": "prose",
|
||||
"blind_id": "R03-S02-V",
|
||||
"attempts_reserved": 1,
|
||||
"prompt_sha256": "be924ba36625b663e3957b29d30303b8042f5a382cb70b11ea111a2762635dc3",
|
||||
"freeze_sha256": "8dfa22d5e03657aaf5d4c3aeb869f7d352ae606842ce36f0576b465d729529be",
|
||||
"max_output_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"endpoint": "http://127.0.0.1:18081",
|
||||
"config": {
|
||||
"model_name": "custodian-triage-balanced",
|
||||
"temperature": 0.2,
|
||||
"max_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"model_params": {},
|
||||
"max_depth": 3,
|
||||
"skip_if_exists": true,
|
||||
"timeout_seconds": 300
|
||||
},
|
||||
"status": "completed",
|
||||
"output_sha256": "4449f16faa0e72418e28e4339229ed57d401d8f2306780538b5b04e15f27629c",
|
||||
"output_words": 138,
|
||||
"elapsed_seconds": 1.608,
|
||||
"responses": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"stage": "decision-review",
|
||||
"model": "google/gemini-2.5-flash",
|
||||
"usage": {
|
||||
"prompt_tokens": 1122,
|
||||
"completion_tokens": 181,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 1303
|
||||
},
|
||||
"finish_reason": "stop",
|
||||
"provider": "openrouter",
|
||||
"response_id": "gen-1792448565-HUhKMl9MFbdsoVr05VGz",
|
||||
"latency_seconds": 1.54,
|
||||
"profile": "custodian-triage-balanced",
|
||||
"profile_model": "google/gemini-2.5-flash",
|
||||
"profile_provider": "openrouter",
|
||||
"diagnostics": {
|
||||
"available": true,
|
||||
"effective_settings": {
|
||||
"temperature": 0.2,
|
||||
"max_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"reasoning_effort_present": false,
|
||||
"reasoning_present": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"provider_usage": {
|
||||
"prompt_tokens": 1122,
|
||||
"completion_tokens": 181,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 1303,
|
||||
"cost": 0.0007891,
|
||||
"completion_tokens_details": {
|
||||
"reasoning_tokens": 0
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"content_characters": 881,
|
||||
"content_sha256": "4449f16faa0e72418e28e4339229ed57d401d8f2306780538b5b04e15f27629c"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"run": "r03",
|
||||
"scenario": "R03-S02",
|
||||
"condition": "prose",
|
||||
"blind_id": "R03-S02-V",
|
||||
"attempts_reserved": 1,
|
||||
"prompt_sha256": "be924ba36625b663e3957b29d30303b8042f5a382cb70b11ea111a2762635dc3",
|
||||
"freeze_sha256": "8dfa22d5e03657aaf5d4c3aeb869f7d352ae606842ce36f0576b465d729529be",
|
||||
"max_output_tokens": 1400
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
|||
* **Operation and Visible State:** Order A is accepted. Order B is an unsubmitted local draft. Reversal C's outcome is unknown due to a lost response. The spinner's disappearance only indicates browser wait cancellation, not rejection of C.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Information and Policy Boundaries:** The system has an authenticated receipt for A's acceptance. The status of C is ambiguous; its lookup, replay, retention, and authorization semantics are undefined, preventing assumptions about its effect.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Recovery Action and Rejected Alternative:** The user needs to reconcile the unknown status of C. A blind retry of C is inappropriate without understanding its identity and idempotency. The system should not assume C failed or succeeded.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Missing Contract:** The lack of documented semantics for C's operation identity, retention, and authorization means the system cannot reliably determine its state or offer appropriate recovery actions like lookup or replay.
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"run": "r04",
|
||||
"scenario": "R03-S02",
|
||||
"condition": "patterns",
|
||||
"blind_id": "R03-S02-U",
|
||||
"attempts_reserved": 1,
|
||||
"prompt_sha256": "3371ff49a2d0f29ac8a65a768f72aebf0228fb5bf950494878ec4980c8b1ff70",
|
||||
"freeze_sha256": "8dfa22d5e03657aaf5d4c3aeb869f7d352ae606842ce36f0576b465d729529be",
|
||||
"max_output_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"endpoint": "http://127.0.0.1:18081",
|
||||
"config": {
|
||||
"model_name": "custodian-triage-balanced",
|
||||
"temperature": 0.2,
|
||||
"max_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"model_params": {},
|
||||
"max_depth": 3,
|
||||
"skip_if_exists": true,
|
||||
"timeout_seconds": 300
|
||||
},
|
||||
"status": "completed",
|
||||
"output_sha256": "a6955f9337f4c83685545e5846680ab1246ec24ccb6b8e577d0a81832c698f06",
|
||||
"output_words": 142,
|
||||
"elapsed_seconds": 2.73,
|
||||
"responses": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"stage": "decision-review",
|
||||
"model": "google/gemini-2.5-flash",
|
||||
"usage": {
|
||||
"prompt_tokens": 1123,
|
||||
"completion_tokens": 186,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 1309
|
||||
},
|
||||
"finish_reason": "stop",
|
||||
"provider": "openrouter",
|
||||
"response_id": "gen-1792448566-uhy5Ce8HYeybjVCCsLrs",
|
||||
"latency_seconds": 2.833,
|
||||
"profile": "custodian-triage-balanced",
|
||||
"profile_model": "google/gemini-2.5-flash",
|
||||
"profile_provider": "openrouter",
|
||||
"diagnostics": {
|
||||
"available": true,
|
||||
"effective_settings": {
|
||||
"temperature": 0.2,
|
||||
"max_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"reasoning_effort_present": false,
|
||||
"reasoning_present": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"provider_usage": {
|
||||
"prompt_tokens": 1123,
|
||||
"completion_tokens": 186,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 1309,
|
||||
"cost": 0.0008019,
|
||||
"completion_tokens_details": {
|
||||
"reasoning_tokens": 0
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"content_characters": 966,
|
||||
"content_sha256": "a6955f9337f4c83685545e5846680ab1246ec24ccb6b8e577d0a81832c698f06"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"run": "r04",
|
||||
"scenario": "R03-S02",
|
||||
"condition": "patterns",
|
||||
"blind_id": "R03-S02-U",
|
||||
"attempts_reserved": 1,
|
||||
"prompt_sha256": "3371ff49a2d0f29ac8a65a768f72aebf0228fb5bf950494878ec4980c8b1ff70",
|
||||
"freeze_sha256": "8dfa22d5e03657aaf5d4c3aeb869f7d352ae606842ce36f0576b465d729529be",
|
||||
"max_output_tokens": 1400
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
|||
Here's a review of the proposed frontend decision:
|
||||
|
||||
* **Operation and Visible State:** The proposed approach risks a race condition where the system might attempt to re-process the original pending upload (P) after a crash, even though a new revision (c) and operation (Q) have been recorded. The user's chosen revision (c) and the new operation (Q) should be committed atomically with the marking of P as non-retryable.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Information and Policy Boundaries:** The scenario implies a local decision to mark P as non-retryable, but this doesn't guarantee the remote receiver will honor it. The lack of documented receiver version/ancestry enforcement means the frontend cannot assume the remote will reject a late-arriving P.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Recovery Action and Rejected Alternative:** The minimal correction is to commit the new revision (c), the new operation (Q), and the non-retryable status of P within a single, recoverable transaction. This prevents P from being re-activated after a crash. The alternative of marking P non-retryable in a separate, later transaction is rejected due to the risk of re-transmission.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Missing Contract:** There is no explicit contract for how the remote receiver handles conflicting or superseded operations. The frontend needs to account for the possibility that a late-arriving P might still be accepted by the server, potentially overwriting the user's chosen revision (c) or creating further divergence.
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"run": "r05",
|
||||
"scenario": "R03-S03",
|
||||
"condition": "patterns",
|
||||
"blind_id": "R03-S03-V",
|
||||
"attempts_reserved": 1,
|
||||
"prompt_sha256": "7a61c90e25d342750b3d9651c90b157975e441822d66e826b1315bce957cafe3",
|
||||
"freeze_sha256": "8dfa22d5e03657aaf5d4c3aeb869f7d352ae606842ce36f0576b465d729529be",
|
||||
"max_output_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"endpoint": "http://127.0.0.1:18081",
|
||||
"config": {
|
||||
"model_name": "custodian-triage-balanced",
|
||||
"temperature": 0.2,
|
||||
"max_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"model_params": {},
|
||||
"max_depth": 3,
|
||||
"skip_if_exists": true,
|
||||
"timeout_seconds": 300
|
||||
},
|
||||
"status": "completed",
|
||||
"output_sha256": "8d6c66fdbd04a7e2650aed8d6fa5d489a04999d7434dc5958815af1e328a8ed9",
|
||||
"output_words": 220,
|
||||
"elapsed_seconds": 3.281,
|
||||
"responses": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"stage": "decision-review",
|
||||
"model": "google/gemini-2.5-flash",
|
||||
"usage": {
|
||||
"prompt_tokens": 1131,
|
||||
"completion_tokens": 303,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 1434
|
||||
},
|
||||
"finish_reason": "stop",
|
||||
"provider": "openrouter",
|
||||
"response_id": "gen-1792448569-S0JJykSkiAoDP7L0tdpD",
|
||||
"latency_seconds": 3.435,
|
||||
"profile": "custodian-triage-balanced",
|
||||
"profile_model": "google/gemini-2.5-flash",
|
||||
"profile_provider": "openrouter",
|
||||
"diagnostics": {
|
||||
"available": true,
|
||||
"effective_settings": {
|
||||
"temperature": 0.2,
|
||||
"max_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"reasoning_effort_present": false,
|
||||
"reasoning_present": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"provider_usage": {
|
||||
"prompt_tokens": 1131,
|
||||
"completion_tokens": 303,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 1434,
|
||||
"cost": 0.0010968,
|
||||
"completion_tokens_details": {
|
||||
"reasoning_tokens": 0
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"content_characters": 1447,
|
||||
"content_sha256": "8d6c66fdbd04a7e2650aed8d6fa5d489a04999d7434dc5958815af1e328a8ed9"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"run": "r05",
|
||||
"scenario": "R03-S03",
|
||||
"condition": "patterns",
|
||||
"blind_id": "R03-S03-V",
|
||||
"attempts_reserved": 1,
|
||||
"prompt_sha256": "7a61c90e25d342750b3d9651c90b157975e441822d66e826b1315bce957cafe3",
|
||||
"freeze_sha256": "8dfa22d5e03657aaf5d4c3aeb869f7d352ae606842ce36f0576b465d729529be",
|
||||
"max_output_tokens": 1400
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
|||
* **Operation and Visible State:** The system must atomically commit the chosen revision `c`, the new operation `Q`, and the non-retryable status of `P` within a single recoverable transaction. This ensures that `P` is not reactivated after a restart if the process dies between transactions.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Information and Policy Boundaries:** The scenario highlights a missing contract regarding the receiver's version and ancestry enforcement. Without this, the system cannot guarantee that an already transmitted `P` will be correctly handled by the receiver, even if marked non-retryable locally.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Recovery Action and Rejected Alternative:** The proposed correction prevents `P` from becoming active again locally after a crash, addressing the risk of re-transmitting a superseded operation. The alternative of marking `P` non-retryable in a separate transaction is rejected due to the vulnerability to process death.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Missing Contract:** The absence of a documented contract for the receiver's version/ancestry enforcement means the system cannot rely on the receiver to correctly handle `P` if it arrives after `Q` or `c`, or if it's a stale version. This requires external reconciliation or a defined receiver policy.
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"run": "r06",
|
||||
"scenario": "R03-S03",
|
||||
"condition": "prose",
|
||||
"blind_id": "R03-S03-U",
|
||||
"attempts_reserved": 1,
|
||||
"prompt_sha256": "76ca0bca70f535da292885af2ead28162daac79e5417b1f92aa68a3d024b7145",
|
||||
"freeze_sha256": "8dfa22d5e03657aaf5d4c3aeb869f7d352ae606842ce36f0576b465d729529be",
|
||||
"max_output_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"endpoint": "http://127.0.0.1:18081",
|
||||
"config": {
|
||||
"model_name": "custodian-triage-balanced",
|
||||
"temperature": 0.2,
|
||||
"max_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"model_params": {},
|
||||
"max_depth": 3,
|
||||
"skip_if_exists": true,
|
||||
"timeout_seconds": 300
|
||||
},
|
||||
"status": "completed",
|
||||
"output_sha256": "3ce6efe6a2cd0135152f2289ba035b2f772aed913c54a09271c2f9d94667ae41",
|
||||
"output_words": 180,
|
||||
"elapsed_seconds": 2.078,
|
||||
"responses": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"stage": "decision-review",
|
||||
"model": "google/gemini-2.5-flash",
|
||||
"usage": {
|
||||
"prompt_tokens": 1130,
|
||||
"completion_tokens": 248,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 1378
|
||||
},
|
||||
"finish_reason": "stop",
|
||||
"provider": "openrouter",
|
||||
"response_id": "gen-1792448573-9JSsRxljmoZUk3hRDFvv",
|
||||
"latency_seconds": 2.023,
|
||||
"profile": "custodian-triage-balanced",
|
||||
"profile_model": "google/gemini-2.5-flash",
|
||||
"profile_provider": "openrouter",
|
||||
"diagnostics": {
|
||||
"available": true,
|
||||
"effective_settings": {
|
||||
"temperature": 0.2,
|
||||
"max_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"reasoning_effort_present": false,
|
||||
"reasoning_present": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"provider_usage": {
|
||||
"prompt_tokens": 1130,
|
||||
"completion_tokens": 248,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 1378,
|
||||
"cost": 0.000959,
|
||||
"completion_tokens_details": {
|
||||
"reasoning_tokens": 0
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"content_characters": 1231,
|
||||
"content_sha256": "3ce6efe6a2cd0135152f2289ba035b2f772aed913c54a09271c2f9d94667ae41"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"run": "r06",
|
||||
"scenario": "R03-S03",
|
||||
"condition": "prose",
|
||||
"blind_id": "R03-S03-U",
|
||||
"attempts_reserved": 1,
|
||||
"prompt_sha256": "76ca0bca70f535da292885af2ead28162daac79e5417b1f92aa68a3d024b7145",
|
||||
"freeze_sha256": "8dfa22d5e03657aaf5d4c3aeb869f7d352ae606842ce36f0576b465d729529be",
|
||||
"max_output_tokens": 1400
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
|||
Here's a review of the proposed frontend decision based on the provided reference:
|
||||
|
||||
* **Operation and Visible State:** The tool separates the current scene from pending uploads and a conflict copy. This aligns with keeping observations and unfinished proposals distinct, and preserving alternatives. However, the "conflict copy" implies divergence detection, but its resolution mechanism and whether it's presented to the user are unclear.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Information and Policy Boundaries:** The tool's local copies and archive are intended for recovery, but their retention, access, and deletion policies are undefined. The reference emphasizes that missing policy means unknown, not unconditional retention or deletion, and that recoverability isn't permission to retain restricted content.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Recovery Action and Rejected Alternative:** The tool claims restart-safe offline save and local copies. However, the reference states that untested recovery is unknown, not impossible. The alternative of relying on an unchecked off-device archive is insufficient, as its restoration of pending identities and content is unverified.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Missing Contract:** There's no defined retention/failure scope for the local copies or the off-device archive. The reference explicitly requires defining this scope and testing clean-store restoration, including pending identities, before promising off-device recovery. Same-device copies are not independent backup.
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"run": "r07",
|
||||
"scenario": "R03-S04",
|
||||
"condition": "prose",
|
||||
"blind_id": "R03-S04-V",
|
||||
"attempts_reserved": 1,
|
||||
"prompt_sha256": "d2e369f6381d6bcc769234a870b079eadec29589308c4ad6a8bc4d17ab035311",
|
||||
"freeze_sha256": "8dfa22d5e03657aaf5d4c3aeb869f7d352ae606842ce36f0576b465d729529be",
|
||||
"max_output_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"endpoint": "http://127.0.0.1:18081",
|
||||
"config": {
|
||||
"model_name": "custodian-triage-balanced",
|
||||
"temperature": 0.2,
|
||||
"max_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"model_params": {},
|
||||
"max_depth": 3,
|
||||
"skip_if_exists": true,
|
||||
"timeout_seconds": 300
|
||||
},
|
||||
"status": "completed",
|
||||
"output_sha256": "758d7cf4f7b86113e82329cb6da91f9f7f98bb4ac976acac89dd2035c009f168",
|
||||
"output_words": 196,
|
||||
"elapsed_seconds": 2.61,
|
||||
"responses": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"stage": "decision-review",
|
||||
"model": "google/gemini-2.5-flash",
|
||||
"usage": {
|
||||
"prompt_tokens": 1122,
|
||||
"completion_tokens": 265,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 1387
|
||||
},
|
||||
"finish_reason": "stop",
|
||||
"provider": "openrouter",
|
||||
"response_id": "gen-1792448575-kjtYxVoBRFKz6JoMyewU",
|
||||
"latency_seconds": 2.699,
|
||||
"profile": "custodian-triage-balanced",
|
||||
"profile_model": "google/gemini-2.5-flash",
|
||||
"profile_provider": "openrouter",
|
||||
"diagnostics": {
|
||||
"available": true,
|
||||
"effective_settings": {
|
||||
"temperature": 0.2,
|
||||
"max_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"reasoning_effort_present": false,
|
||||
"reasoning_present": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"provider_usage": {
|
||||
"prompt_tokens": 1122,
|
||||
"completion_tokens": 265,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 1387,
|
||||
"cost": 0.0009991,
|
||||
"completion_tokens_details": {
|
||||
"reasoning_tokens": 0
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"content_characters": 1449,
|
||||
"content_sha256": "758d7cf4f7b86113e82329cb6da91f9f7f98bb4ac976acac89dd2035c009f168"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"run": "r07",
|
||||
"scenario": "R03-S04",
|
||||
"condition": "prose",
|
||||
"blind_id": "R03-S04-V",
|
||||
"attempts_reserved": 1,
|
||||
"prompt_sha256": "d2e369f6381d6bcc769234a870b079eadec29589308c4ad6a8bc4d17ab035311",
|
||||
"freeze_sha256": "8dfa22d5e03657aaf5d4c3aeb869f7d352ae606842ce36f0576b465d729529be",
|
||||
"max_output_tokens": 1400
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
|||
* **Operation and Visible State:** The tool's report of surviving a process restart and keeping local copies indicates a "Local Draft State" and "Local Commit Boundary" for the scene and pending queue. The user sees a restored state after a restart.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Information and Policy Boundaries:** The off-device archive's guarantees are unknown. The reference states that "A missing policy is unknown, not an unconditional retention or deletion rule." Without checked key availability, deletion retention, and restoration of pending operation identities, the archive's utility is undefined.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Recovery Action and Rejected Alternative:** The scenario implicitly rejects the alternative of having no local recovery. However, the "Local Commit Boundary" mechanism states that "Untested recovery is unknown rather than impossible." The team needs to test the off-device archive's recovery.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Missing Contract:** There is no established contract for off-device recovery. "Same-device copies and synchronization do not establish independent backup." The reference requires defining "retention/failure scope and test clean-store restoration...before promising off-device recovery."
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"run": "r08",
|
||||
"scenario": "R03-S04",
|
||||
"condition": "patterns",
|
||||
"blind_id": "R03-S04-U",
|
||||
"attempts_reserved": 1,
|
||||
"prompt_sha256": "8705d35a4bc045405986796e6dcd96d687a82b409e6d0208e697bea5c5d207d1",
|
||||
"freeze_sha256": "8dfa22d5e03657aaf5d4c3aeb869f7d352ae606842ce36f0576b465d729529be",
|
||||
"max_output_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"endpoint": "http://127.0.0.1:18081",
|
||||
"config": {
|
||||
"model_name": "custodian-triage-balanced",
|
||||
"temperature": 0.2,
|
||||
"max_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"model_params": {},
|
||||
"max_depth": 3,
|
||||
"skip_if_exists": true,
|
||||
"timeout_seconds": 300
|
||||
},
|
||||
"status": "completed",
|
||||
"output_sha256": "df9646449c82c56344fe5f98969385d18f3ece175207345dd5516bf06b84537a",
|
||||
"output_words": 159,
|
||||
"elapsed_seconds": 2.471,
|
||||
"responses": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"stage": "decision-review",
|
||||
"model": "google/gemini-2.5-flash",
|
||||
"usage": {
|
||||
"prompt_tokens": 1123,
|
||||
"completion_tokens": 226,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 1349
|
||||
},
|
||||
"finish_reason": "stop",
|
||||
"provider": "openrouter",
|
||||
"response_id": "gen-1792448578-UM4iib5OkpvJqrXFq3sZ",
|
||||
"latency_seconds": 2.552,
|
||||
"profile": "custodian-triage-balanced",
|
||||
"profile_model": "google/gemini-2.5-flash",
|
||||
"profile_provider": "openrouter",
|
||||
"diagnostics": {
|
||||
"available": true,
|
||||
"effective_settings": {
|
||||
"temperature": 0.2,
|
||||
"max_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"reasoning_effort_present": false,
|
||||
"reasoning_present": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"provider_usage": {
|
||||
"prompt_tokens": 1123,
|
||||
"completion_tokens": 226,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 1349,
|
||||
"cost": 0.0009019,
|
||||
"completion_tokens_details": {
|
||||
"reasoning_tokens": 0
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"content_characters": 1183,
|
||||
"content_sha256": "df9646449c82c56344fe5f98969385d18f3ece175207345dd5516bf06b84537a"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"run": "r08",
|
||||
"scenario": "R03-S04",
|
||||
"condition": "patterns",
|
||||
"blind_id": "R03-S04-U",
|
||||
"attempts_reserved": 1,
|
||||
"prompt_sha256": "8705d35a4bc045405986796e6dcd96d687a82b409e6d0208e697bea5c5d207d1",
|
||||
"freeze_sha256": "8dfa22d5e03657aaf5d4c3aeb869f7d352ae606842ce36f0576b465d729529be",
|
||||
"max_output_tokens": 1400
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
|||
* **Operation and Visible State:** The editor retains the original payload and operation identity, which is good for tracking. However, the system's visible state regarding the operation's acceptance is ambiguous due to the lost response and unclear lookup result.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Information and Policy Boundaries:** The receiver's deduplication guarantee has a strict 16-hour time limit, which has been exceeded. The service's response for "no record" lacks clarity on whether it implies non-acceptance or expired history, creating an information boundary issue.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Recovery Action and Rejected Alternative:** Resending the original identity K is risky due to the expired deduplication window, potentially leading to duplicates. Creating a fresh identity is safer for avoiding duplicates, but it doesn't confirm the status of the original submission. An automatic recovery plan is not feasible without clearer server state.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Missing Contract:** There's a missing contract for how the service communicates the definitive status of an operation after its deduplication window expires, especially when the initial response is lost. This ambiguity prevents a reliable automatic recovery strategy.
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"run": "r09",
|
||||
"scenario": "R03-S05",
|
||||
"condition": "patterns",
|
||||
"blind_id": "R03-S05-V",
|
||||
"attempts_reserved": 1,
|
||||
"prompt_sha256": "8944e9bd64680ed927ece8c8e1ad9104b589f5e6b21fa7872ec35e5d728d90c1",
|
||||
"freeze_sha256": "8dfa22d5e03657aaf5d4c3aeb869f7d352ae606842ce36f0576b465d729529be",
|
||||
"max_output_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"endpoint": "http://127.0.0.1:18081",
|
||||
"config": {
|
||||
"model_name": "custodian-triage-balanced",
|
||||
"temperature": 0.2,
|
||||
"max_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"model_params": {},
|
||||
"max_depth": 3,
|
||||
"skip_if_exists": true,
|
||||
"timeout_seconds": 300
|
||||
},
|
||||
"status": "completed",
|
||||
"output_sha256": "8b4e0a912147309e915631b00b8b1c2dfff14850cd9a4cc9e7e631295e0e9687",
|
||||
"output_words": 170,
|
||||
"elapsed_seconds": 2.82,
|
||||
"responses": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"stage": "decision-review",
|
||||
"model": "google/gemini-2.5-flash",
|
||||
"usage": {
|
||||
"prompt_tokens": 1124,
|
||||
"completion_tokens": 225,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 1349
|
||||
},
|
||||
"finish_reason": "stop",
|
||||
"provider": "openrouter",
|
||||
"response_id": "gen-1792448581-rSIr6COICQU25HvlYgBM",
|
||||
"latency_seconds": 2.856,
|
||||
"profile": "custodian-triage-balanced",
|
||||
"profile_model": "google/gemini-2.5-flash",
|
||||
"profile_provider": "openrouter",
|
||||
"diagnostics": {
|
||||
"available": true,
|
||||
"effective_settings": {
|
||||
"temperature": 0.2,
|
||||
"max_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"reasoning_effort_present": false,
|
||||
"reasoning_present": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"provider_usage": {
|
||||
"prompt_tokens": 1124,
|
||||
"completion_tokens": 225,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 1349,
|
||||
"cost": 0.0008997,
|
||||
"completion_tokens_details": {
|
||||
"reasoning_tokens": 0
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"content_characters": 1197,
|
||||
"content_sha256": "8b4e0a912147309e915631b00b8b1c2dfff14850cd9a4cc9e7e631295e0e9687"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"run": "r09",
|
||||
"scenario": "R03-S05",
|
||||
"condition": "patterns",
|
||||
"blind_id": "R03-S05-V",
|
||||
"attempts_reserved": 1,
|
||||
"prompt_sha256": "8944e9bd64680ed927ece8c8e1ad9104b589f5e6b21fa7872ec35e5d728d90c1",
|
||||
"freeze_sha256": "8dfa22d5e03657aaf5d4c3aeb869f7d352ae606842ce36f0576b465d729529be",
|
||||
"max_output_tokens": 1400
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
|||
* The editor's operation and visible state are ambiguous. The original payload and identity K are retained, but the remote status is unknown. The editor cannot distinguish between an unaccepted operation and one whose history has expired.
|
||||
|
||||
* Information and policy boundaries are crossed. The editor's retention of K exceeds the remote deduplication guarantee. The service's response does not provide clear information about the fate of K, creating an information boundary issue.
|
||||
|
||||
* The recovery action is to resend K or create a fresh identity. The rejected alternative is an automatic duplicate-free recovery plan, which is not feasible due to the ambiguity of the remote state and the expired deduplication window.
|
||||
|
||||
* A missing contract exists for the remote service's behavior regarding expired history. The service does not explicitly state whether "no record" implies non-acceptance or simply expired retention of the operation's history.
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"run": "r10",
|
||||
"scenario": "R03-S05",
|
||||
"condition": "prose",
|
||||
"blind_id": "R03-S05-U",
|
||||
"attempts_reserved": 1,
|
||||
"prompt_sha256": "734d42b631b58b06246db211270c10823100e5e3249964aad286dd9e725d725c",
|
||||
"freeze_sha256": "8dfa22d5e03657aaf5d4c3aeb869f7d352ae606842ce36f0576b465d729529be",
|
||||
"max_output_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"endpoint": "http://127.0.0.1:18081",
|
||||
"config": {
|
||||
"model_name": "custodian-triage-balanced",
|
||||
"temperature": 0.2,
|
||||
"max_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"model_params": {},
|
||||
"max_depth": 3,
|
||||
"skip_if_exists": true,
|
||||
"timeout_seconds": 300
|
||||
},
|
||||
"status": "completed",
|
||||
"output_sha256": "4e45651886530dd1069bfbfa91fce65104330f2a47da8211a84b951feff234e8",
|
||||
"output_words": 143,
|
||||
"elapsed_seconds": 1.508,
|
||||
"responses": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"stage": "decision-review",
|
||||
"model": "google/gemini-2.5-flash",
|
||||
"usage": {
|
||||
"prompt_tokens": 1123,
|
||||
"completion_tokens": 183,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 1306
|
||||
},
|
||||
"finish_reason": "stop",
|
||||
"provider": "openrouter",
|
||||
"response_id": "gen-1792448584-SpRl6jeHi6Fj4IWmJjM1",
|
||||
"latency_seconds": 1.481,
|
||||
"profile": "custodian-triage-balanced",
|
||||
"profile_model": "google/gemini-2.5-flash",
|
||||
"profile_provider": "openrouter",
|
||||
"diagnostics": {
|
||||
"available": true,
|
||||
"effective_settings": {
|
||||
"temperature": 0.2,
|
||||
"max_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"reasoning_effort_present": false,
|
||||
"reasoning_present": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"provider_usage": {
|
||||
"prompt_tokens": 1123,
|
||||
"completion_tokens": 183,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 1306,
|
||||
"cost": 0.0007944,
|
||||
"completion_tokens_details": {
|
||||
"reasoning_tokens": 0
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"content_characters": 952,
|
||||
"content_sha256": "4e45651886530dd1069bfbfa91fce65104330f2a47da8211a84b951feff234e8"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"run": "r10",
|
||||
"scenario": "R03-S05",
|
||||
"condition": "prose",
|
||||
"blind_id": "R03-S05-U",
|
||||
"attempts_reserved": 1,
|
||||
"prompt_sha256": "734d42b631b58b06246db211270c10823100e5e3249964aad286dd9e725d725c",
|
||||
"freeze_sha256": "8dfa22d5e03657aaf5d4c3aeb869f7d352ae606842ce36f0576b465d729529be",
|
||||
"max_output_tokens": 1400
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
|||
* The accepted batch import `I` should be treated as complete, and the failure to refresh visible cards does not invalidate its acceptance. The new card draft `D` must be preserved separately from any refresh attempts.
|
||||
|
||||
* The authenticated receipt for `I` establishes its acceptance. The lack of an ordering contract for the cache read means its opaque version labels cannot be used to infer the current state or to justify re-running `I`.
|
||||
|
||||
* The correct recovery action is to refresh the affected observations while keeping the unfinished draft `D` separate. Rerunning `I` is an incorrect action as it was already accepted. Replacing the editor from the cache is also incorrect due to the lack of a read-after-write contract.
|
||||
|
||||
* The proposal is missing a contract for how to handle divergent observations after an accepted operation, specifically how to reconcile the visible cards with the accepted import `I` when a refresh fails and a background cache provides inconsistent data.
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"run": "r11",
|
||||
"scenario": "R03-S06",
|
||||
"condition": "prose",
|
||||
"blind_id": "R03-S06-U",
|
||||
"attempts_reserved": 1,
|
||||
"prompt_sha256": "c2007173765706f16ed61ff93f1246b960ca31b3cee5b6e511863606f23a6433",
|
||||
"freeze_sha256": "8dfa22d5e03657aaf5d4c3aeb869f7d352ae606842ce36f0576b465d729529be",
|
||||
"max_output_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"endpoint": "http://127.0.0.1:18081",
|
||||
"config": {
|
||||
"model_name": "custodian-triage-balanced",
|
||||
"temperature": 0.2,
|
||||
"max_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"model_params": {},
|
||||
"max_depth": 3,
|
||||
"skip_if_exists": true,
|
||||
"timeout_seconds": 300
|
||||
},
|
||||
"status": "completed",
|
||||
"output_sha256": "a500944856ace7d9ec6cdfd36c65d21a9b695cfcc142dcb3ca7618dc78f7b27b",
|
||||
"output_words": 159,
|
||||
"elapsed_seconds": 1.866,
|
||||
"responses": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"stage": "decision-review",
|
||||
"model": "google/gemini-2.5-flash",
|
||||
"usage": {
|
||||
"prompt_tokens": 1118,
|
||||
"completion_tokens": 197,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 1315
|
||||
},
|
||||
"finish_reason": "stop",
|
||||
"provider": "openrouter",
|
||||
"response_id": "gen-1792448586-MQM4eI1VgPOLawAvzEob",
|
||||
"latency_seconds": 1.884,
|
||||
"profile": "custodian-triage-balanced",
|
||||
"profile_model": "google/gemini-2.5-flash",
|
||||
"profile_provider": "openrouter",
|
||||
"diagnostics": {
|
||||
"available": true,
|
||||
"effective_settings": {
|
||||
"temperature": 0.2,
|
||||
"max_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"reasoning_effort_present": false,
|
||||
"reasoning_present": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"provider_usage": {
|
||||
"prompt_tokens": 1118,
|
||||
"completion_tokens": 197,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 1315,
|
||||
"cost": 0.0008279,
|
||||
"completion_tokens_details": {
|
||||
"reasoning_tokens": 0
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"content_characters": 991,
|
||||
"content_sha256": "a500944856ace7d9ec6cdfd36c65d21a9b695cfcc142dcb3ca7618dc78f7b27b"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"run": "r11",
|
||||
"scenario": "R03-S06",
|
||||
"condition": "prose",
|
||||
"blind_id": "R03-S06-U",
|
||||
"attempts_reserved": 1,
|
||||
"prompt_sha256": "c2007173765706f16ed61ff93f1246b960ca31b3cee5b6e511863606f23a6433",
|
||||
"freeze_sha256": "8dfa22d5e03657aaf5d4c3aeb869f7d352ae606842ce36f0576b465d729529be",
|
||||
"max_output_tokens": 1400
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
|||
1. **Operation and Visible State:** The batch import was accepted, but the visible cards are not refreshed. A new card draft is in progress. The cache read provides opaque version labels without ordering guarantees.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Information and Policy Boundaries:** The acceptance of the import is distinct from the freshness of the view. A failed refresh does not invalidate the accepted operation. The new card draft is separate from the import and its refresh.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Recovery Action and Rejected Alternative:** Refresh the affected observations after the import's acceptance, while keeping the unfinished card draft separate. Do not rerun the import or replace the editor from the cache, as this would discard the in-progress draft and potentially re-introduce already accepted work.
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Missing Contract:** There is no documented read-after-write or server ordering contract, nor is there an authoritative result or subscription mechanism to avoid a separate fetch for current data.
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"run": "r12",
|
||||
"scenario": "R03-S06",
|
||||
"condition": "patterns",
|
||||
"blind_id": "R03-S06-V",
|
||||
"attempts_reserved": 1,
|
||||
"prompt_sha256": "b4c71336ea9dd8563db6432e00f1344ebc3379258364f390af73854df89ab432",
|
||||
"freeze_sha256": "8dfa22d5e03657aaf5d4c3aeb869f7d352ae606842ce36f0576b465d729529be",
|
||||
"max_output_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"endpoint": "http://127.0.0.1:18081",
|
||||
"config": {
|
||||
"model_name": "custodian-triage-balanced",
|
||||
"temperature": 0.2,
|
||||
"max_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"model_params": {},
|
||||
"max_depth": 3,
|
||||
"skip_if_exists": true,
|
||||
"timeout_seconds": 300
|
||||
},
|
||||
"status": "completed",
|
||||
"output_sha256": "f1ab2933f5a94197de64b15da20aa011814c50ff9a4c7b05135ae8f42cfd72a0",
|
||||
"output_words": 148,
|
||||
"elapsed_seconds": 1.974,
|
||||
"responses": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"stage": "decision-review",
|
||||
"model": "google/gemini-2.5-flash",
|
||||
"usage": {
|
||||
"prompt_tokens": 1119,
|
||||
"completion_tokens": 190,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 1309
|
||||
},
|
||||
"finish_reason": "stop",
|
||||
"provider": "openrouter",
|
||||
"response_id": "gen-1792448588-sOyGuSrp2tBPehg74p4t",
|
||||
"latency_seconds": 1.942,
|
||||
"profile": "custodian-triage-balanced",
|
||||
"profile_model": "google/gemini-2.5-flash",
|
||||
"profile_provider": "openrouter",
|
||||
"diagnostics": {
|
||||
"available": true,
|
||||
"effective_settings": {
|
||||
"temperature": 0.2,
|
||||
"max_tokens": 1400,
|
||||
"reasoning_effort_present": false,
|
||||
"reasoning_present": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"provider_usage": {
|
||||
"prompt_tokens": 1119,
|
||||
"completion_tokens": 190,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 1309,
|
||||
"cost": 0.0008107,
|
||||
"completion_tokens_details": {
|
||||
"reasoning_tokens": 0
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"content_characters": 985,
|
||||
"content_sha256": "f1ab2933f5a94197de64b15da20aa011814c50ff9a4c7b05135ae8f42cfd72a0"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"run": "r12",
|
||||
"scenario": "R03-S06",
|
||||
"condition": "patterns",
|
||||
"blind_id": "R03-S06-V",
|
||||
"attempts_reserved": 1,
|
||||
"prompt_sha256": "b4c71336ea9dd8563db6432e00f1344ebc3379258364f390af73854df89ab432",
|
||||
"freeze_sha256": "8dfa22d5e03657aaf5d4c3aeb869f7d352ae606842ce36f0576b465d729529be",
|
||||
"max_output_tokens": 1400
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -43,8 +43,7 @@ submitted-review-01 worksheet was a model review and does not count.
|
|||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: FEP-WP-0009-T02
|
||||
status: wait
|
||||
blocking_reason: "Replication-03 packet frozen (2026-10-20). Needs llm-connect reachable from the workstation and fresh explicit authorization of up to 12 capped calls; no retries."
|
||||
status: progress
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "8e0ac763-eba4-5625-ad63-af53322bcac4"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
|
@ -177,3 +176,13 @@ with its own identity via a wrapper that leaves replication-02's frozen bytes in
|
|||
packs are byte-identical to replication-02 and both packet checks plus tests pass.
|
||||
No inference was made. T02 remains wait on llm-connect reachability from the
|
||||
workstation and fresh explicit authorization of up to 12 capped calls (D4).
|
||||
|
||||
## Replication-03 executed — 2026-10-20
|
||||
|
||||
Owner authorized the port-forward and 12 capped calls. Health preflight passed; all
|
||||
12 sessions completed on their single reserved attempt (google/gemini-2.5-flash via
|
||||
custodian-triage-balanced, temperature 0.2, cap 1,400; 16,145 tokens; provider-reported
|
||||
USD 0.0107; no retries, no length violations). The forward was stopped afterwards.
|
||||
[Aggregate summary](../research/evaluations/language-replication-03/execution-summary.json).
|
||||
T02 stays in progress until the owner and external human reviews and adjudication
|
||||
exist; no answer has been scored and no condition result is known.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue