Reconcile pattern metadata and prepare contrasting primary-source inputs
Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a0cffe-206f-7323-89d3-b20ca4cf4bf9
This commit is contained in:
parent
444d7c7337
commit
71a8c1424b
36 changed files with 1018 additions and 157 deletions
9
research/examples/SchemaEvidence.md
Normal file
9
research/examples/SchemaEvidence.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
|||
# Synthetic schema evidence
|
||||
|
||||
Status: fixture only; no corpus admission or source-research claims.
|
||||
|
||||
## C01
|
||||
|
||||
Invented scenario: a form retains its draft while showing that submission is
|
||||
pending. The fixture proposes that these mechanisms complement one another.
|
||||
This exercises ID, evidence and relation resolution; it does not prove recurrence.
|
||||
71
research/examples/schema-contract.yaml
Normal file
71
research/examples/schema-contract.yaml
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
|
|||
fixture_only: true
|
||||
sources:
|
||||
- id: SRC-TEST-001
|
||||
review: research/examples/SchemaEvidence.md
|
||||
claims:
|
||||
- C01
|
||||
patterns:
|
||||
- schema_version: '0.1'
|
||||
id: FEP-0001
|
||||
name: Example Draft State
|
||||
family:
|
||||
- affordance
|
||||
scales:
|
||||
- L6
|
||||
status: draft
|
||||
context:
|
||||
- Synthetic form interaction
|
||||
prerequisites:
|
||||
- A distinguishable uncommitted operation
|
||||
forces:
|
||||
improves:
|
||||
- continuity-of-interaction
|
||||
worsens:
|
||||
- implementation-complexity
|
||||
relations:
|
||||
- type: complements
|
||||
target:
|
||||
kind: pattern
|
||||
ref: FEP-0002
|
||||
rationale: 'Synthetic hypothesis: retained input and visible pending state may
|
||||
be useful together.'
|
||||
evidence:
|
||||
- E1
|
||||
known_uses: []
|
||||
evidence:
|
||||
maturity: hypothesis
|
||||
sources:
|
||||
- id: E1
|
||||
source: SRC-TEST-001
|
||||
locator: Synthetic scenario C01
|
||||
review: research/examples/SchemaEvidence.md
|
||||
claims:
|
||||
- C01
|
||||
- schema_version: '0.1'
|
||||
id: FEP-0002
|
||||
name: Example Pending Feedback
|
||||
family:
|
||||
- affordance
|
||||
scales:
|
||||
- L6
|
||||
status: draft
|
||||
context:
|
||||
- Synthetic form interaction
|
||||
prerequisites:
|
||||
- A distinguishable uncommitted operation
|
||||
forces:
|
||||
improves:
|
||||
- perceived-responsiveness
|
||||
worsens:
|
||||
- implementation-complexity
|
||||
relations: []
|
||||
known_uses: []
|
||||
evidence:
|
||||
maturity: hypothesis
|
||||
sources:
|
||||
- id: E1
|
||||
source: SRC-TEST-001
|
||||
locator: Synthetic scenario C01
|
||||
review: research/examples/SchemaEvidence.md
|
||||
claims:
|
||||
- C01
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue