Record pinned Zulip acceptance and projection evidence

Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra
Assistant-Session: 01a0e241-8285-7a63-8c0c-51c9cb824dc3
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-09-27 11:57:10 +02:00
parent ff0c1d4d35
commit b181470b58
9 changed files with 529 additions and 3 deletions

View file

@ -51,13 +51,13 @@ Ten selected retrospective outcomes (not a historical census), followed by prosp
| Outcome | Entries (not independent discoveries) |
| --- | ---: |
| corroboration | 2 |
| corroboration | 3 |
| inconclusive | 0 |
| merge | 0 |
| rejection | 0 |
| revision | 13 |
Cycles with recorded research effort: 5/15. Unknown effort is neither zero nor estimated from commits, tokens or assertion counts.
Cycles with recorded research effort: 6/16. Unknown effort is neither zero nor estimated from commits, tokens or assertion counts.
### Stream B / B-independent-navigation-source-v1
@ -91,6 +91,14 @@ One bounded question counts at most one consequential outcome. Corroboration and
One bounded question counts at most one consequential outcome. Corroboration and inconclusive work remain visible separately. Fewer than three comparable cycles: no trend assessment.
### Stream cross-stream / CD-acceptance-projection-static-v1
| Cycle | Outcome | Research minutes | Consequential outcome/hour |
| --- | --- | ---: | ---: |
| LEARN-0016 | corroboration | 4.182 | 0.00 |
One bounded question counts at most one consequential outcome. Corroboration and inconclusive work remain visible separately. Fewer than three comparable cycles: no trend assessment.
### Stream cross-stream / CD-authority-projection-documentary-v1
| Cycle | Outcome | Research minutes | Consequential outcome/hour |
@ -591,3 +599,17 @@ Evidence: [AuthorityProjectionComparison](../../research/reviews/AuthorityProjec
Remaining uncertainty: Six living primary documents across four families, not independent full-contract implementations; exact revisions unknown. Synthetic VC-01/02 reasoning is not execution or demonstrated usefulness; authority/merge/storage and phase-specific recovery contracts still need application evidence. Existing candidate profiles unchanged; five prospective groups are not a comparable learning trend.
Supersedes: none recorded.
### LEARN-0016 — Does the six-question authority/projection aid distinguish local editable content, remote shared acceptance and subsequent projection in a pinned application?
2026-09-27 · stream cross-stream · prospective · corroboration
Before: Scoped acceptance, projection location and delivery schedule are separate questions with compatibility constraints; a local display need not establish shared acceptance.
Conclusion: Corroborated in pinned Zulip content editing: conditional local Markdown echo precedes remote validation; locked optional content checks and server rendering precede save/event scheduling; HTTP and event application are distinct paths. Same displayed object can carry tentative content. No candidate or maturity change.
Evidence: [ZulipAcceptanceProjection](../../research/reviews/ZulipAcceptanceProjection.md), [ZulipAcceptanceSources](../../research/reviews/ZulipAcceptanceSources.json), [2026-09-27-zulip-acceptance-effort](../../research/evolution/cycles/2026-09-27-zulip-acceptance-effort.json).
Remaining uncertainty: Ten selected source/test files from one existing Zulip family, no application/database/upstream test execution or full-contract recurrence. Response/event ordering, lost response after acceptance and current-edit ownership need preregistered reproduction; no defect or safe-replay claim. Six prospective groups are not a comparable trend; original human and milestone gates remain open.
Supersedes: none recorded.