Record pinned Zulip acceptance and projection evidence
Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a0e241-8285-7a63-8c0c-51c9cb824dc3
This commit is contained in:
parent
ff0c1d4d35
commit
b181470b58
9 changed files with 529 additions and 3 deletions
|
|
@ -51,13 +51,13 @@ Ten selected retrospective outcomes (not a historical census), followed by prosp
|
|||
|
||||
| Outcome | Entries (not independent discoveries) |
|
||||
| --- | ---: |
|
||||
| corroboration | 2 |
|
||||
| corroboration | 3 |
|
||||
| inconclusive | 0 |
|
||||
| merge | 0 |
|
||||
| rejection | 0 |
|
||||
| revision | 13 |
|
||||
|
||||
Cycles with recorded research effort: 5/15. Unknown effort is neither zero nor estimated from commits, tokens or assertion counts.
|
||||
Cycles with recorded research effort: 6/16. Unknown effort is neither zero nor estimated from commits, tokens or assertion counts.
|
||||
|
||||
### Stream B / B-independent-navigation-source-v1
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -91,6 +91,14 @@ One bounded question counts at most one consequential outcome. Corroboration and
|
|||
|
||||
One bounded question counts at most one consequential outcome. Corroboration and inconclusive work remain visible separately. Fewer than three comparable cycles: no trend assessment.
|
||||
|
||||
### Stream cross-stream / CD-acceptance-projection-static-v1
|
||||
|
||||
| Cycle | Outcome | Research minutes | Consequential outcome/hour |
|
||||
| --- | --- | ---: | ---: |
|
||||
| LEARN-0016 | corroboration | 4.182 | 0.00 |
|
||||
|
||||
One bounded question counts at most one consequential outcome. Corroboration and inconclusive work remain visible separately. Fewer than three comparable cycles: no trend assessment.
|
||||
|
||||
### Stream cross-stream / CD-authority-projection-documentary-v1
|
||||
|
||||
| Cycle | Outcome | Research minutes | Consequential outcome/hour |
|
||||
|
|
@ -591,3 +599,17 @@ Evidence: [AuthorityProjectionComparison](../../research/reviews/AuthorityProjec
|
|||
Remaining uncertainty: Six living primary documents across four families, not independent full-contract implementations; exact revisions unknown. Synthetic VC-01/02 reasoning is not execution or demonstrated usefulness; authority/merge/storage and phase-specific recovery contracts still need application evidence. Existing candidate profiles unchanged; five prospective groups are not a comparable learning trend.
|
||||
|
||||
Supersedes: none recorded.
|
||||
|
||||
### LEARN-0016 — Does the six-question authority/projection aid distinguish local editable content, remote shared acceptance and subsequent projection in a pinned application?
|
||||
|
||||
2026-09-27 · stream cross-stream · prospective · corroboration
|
||||
|
||||
Before: Scoped acceptance, projection location and delivery schedule are separate questions with compatibility constraints; a local display need not establish shared acceptance.
|
||||
|
||||
Conclusion: Corroborated in pinned Zulip content editing: conditional local Markdown echo precedes remote validation; locked optional content checks and server rendering precede save/event scheduling; HTTP and event application are distinct paths. Same displayed object can carry tentative content. No candidate or maturity change.
|
||||
|
||||
Evidence: [ZulipAcceptanceProjection](../../research/reviews/ZulipAcceptanceProjection.md), [ZulipAcceptanceSources](../../research/reviews/ZulipAcceptanceSources.json), [2026-09-27-zulip-acceptance-effort](../../research/evolution/cycles/2026-09-27-zulip-acceptance-effort.json).
|
||||
|
||||
Remaining uncertainty: Ten selected source/test files from one existing Zulip family, no application/database/upstream test execution or full-contract recurrence. Response/event ordering, lost response after acceptance and current-edit ownership need preregistered reproduction; no defect or safe-replay claim. Six prospective groups are not a comparable trend; original human and milestone gates remain open.
|
||||
|
||||
Supersedes: none recorded.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue