Distinguish feature organization from independent release boundaries
Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a0cffe-206f-7323-89d3-b20ca4cf4bf9
This commit is contained in:
parent
29ccad7002
commit
b8eec87f08
14 changed files with 460 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -60,3 +60,8 @@ A partial guard loses input; a complete remedy remains open. Original results re
|
|||
Latest bounded mechanism test: [ownership routing](reviews/NestedOwnershipRouting.md)
|
||||
meets 24/24 routed assertions versus 20/24 unmodified controls, with explicit scope
|
||||
limits. No delay or readiness wait; no production fork or canonical promotion.
|
||||
|
||||
Latest breadth evidence: [feature versus deployment boundaries](reviews/FeatureDeploymentBoundaries.md)
|
||||
compares pinned example sources and adds [provisional VC-06](walkthroughs/VC06-MicrofrontendEstate.md).
|
||||
Independent Feature Boundary develops an existing seed; current corpus has seventeen
|
||||
hypotheses and four synthetic walkthroughs. No deployment independence was runtime-verified.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue