From c161369ad58782ff0a13429c61cc7c8efc36e33d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: repo-manager <repo-manager@local>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 07:58:10 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] repo.work.assign_missing_identifiers

source: repo-manager
reason: deterministic projection registration

Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra
Assistant-Session: 01a0cffe-206f-7323-89d3-b20ca4cf4bf9
---
 workplans/FEP-WP-0003-contrasting-schools.md | 4 ++++
 workplans/FEP-WP-0004-reference-surface.md   | 4 ++++
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/workplans/FEP-WP-0003-contrasting-schools.md b/workplans/FEP-WP-0003-contrasting-schools.md
index 1d75c94..fa2aa33 100644
--- a/workplans/FEP-WP-0003-contrasting-schools.md
+++ b/workplans/FEP-WP-0003-contrasting-schools.md
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ owner: codex
 topic_slug: canon
 created: "2026-09-24"
 updated: "2026-09-24"
+state_hub_workstream_id: "13c123f1-a470-560e-ab8e-b270c387930a"
 ---
 
 # Challenge the language across architectural schools
@@ -23,6 +24,7 @@ Individual task descriptions identify any work that can start earlier.
 id: FEP-WP-0003-T01
 status: todo
 priority: high
+state_hub_task_id: "f7a7eea5-5055-545b-a957-55ee4d17a256"
 ```
 
 Build a source coverage matrix for streams A–F in ResearchProgram.md. Complete a primary-source review for each stream, including disagreements and independent known uses. Q05 and Q06 guide the comparison; source counts alone do not establish coverage.
@@ -33,6 +35,7 @@ Build a source coverage matrix for streams A–F in ResearchProgram.md. Complete
 id: FEP-WP-0003-T02
 status: todo
 priority: high
+state_hub_task_id: "05de53b6-1771-5137-9602-bf614cb1bf0a"
 ```
 
 After the M1 review, complete VC-03 through VC-06 using the walkthrough template. Mark coverage of VC-07 through VC-10 with evidence and gaps. Revise sequences and architecture decompositions where constraints break the current model.
@@ -43,6 +46,7 @@ After the M1 review, complete VC-03 through VC-06 using the walkthrough template
 id: FEP-WP-0003-T03
 status: todo
 priority: medium
+state_hub_task_id: "2b7252c1-c453-5050-96fb-d86a3f3df0f0"
 ```
 
 Record retain/merge/split/reject decisions, revised relations, quality constraints and counterexamples. Write research/reviews/M2-CoverageReview.md against the M2 gate; hand unresolved questions into live work records before closing.
diff --git a/workplans/FEP-WP-0004-reference-surface.md b/workplans/FEP-WP-0004-reference-surface.md
index c5d7642..94b3493 100644
--- a/workplans/FEP-WP-0004-reference-surface.md
+++ b/workplans/FEP-WP-0004-reference-surface.md
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ owner: codex
 topic_slug: canon
 created: "2026-09-24"
 updated: "2026-09-24"
+state_hub_workstream_id: "831bbc30-30c0-5df3-a315-5355cd3b8ee5"
 ---
 
 # Evaluate retrieval and real repository applicability
@@ -23,6 +24,7 @@ Individual task descriptions identify any work that can start earlier.
 id: FEP-WP-0004-T01
 status: todo
 priority: high
+state_hub_task_id: "4fec98f6-fee2-52fc-a01c-f490c79ee0f8"
 ```
 
 After the schema and seed examples pass M1, implement the smallest validator/exporter needed to check unique IDs, allowed values, relation targets and evidence references. Add meaningful invalid and valid fixtures; preserve prose and source provenance.
@@ -33,6 +35,7 @@ After the schema and seed examples pass M1, implement the smallest validator/exp
 id: FEP-WP-0004-T02
 status: todo
 priority: medium
+state_hub_task_id: "4bdd4c53-fcdb-5dfd-9a37-ebc3fee4d445"
 ```
 
 After M2, freeze a corpus revision and evaluate at least six unseen prompts following ValidationCases.md. Record expected alternatives, abstentions, unsupported claims and missed constraints; compare with manual navigation. Address Q07.
@@ -43,6 +46,7 @@ After M2, freeze a corpus revision and evaluate at least six unseen prompts foll
 id: FEP-WP-0004-T03
 status: todo
 priority: medium
+state_hub_task_id: "ab66848b-1045-54dd-9711-52c5560faafa"
 ```
 
 Study at least two contrasting accessible repositories at recorded revisions. Separate observed implementation from inferred intent. Write research/reviews/M3-EmpiricalReview.md, publish limitations, and hand remaining findings into live work records.