From c53be82a0e2fd0004fd54c6606172028542ea0d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: tegwick Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 23:33:23 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Submit complete human pilot-01 review (S01-S06) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 182330@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 242866cf-789d-4e24-ac5e-0a1d7b47a701 --- .../review-bernd-worsch-2026-10-19.json | 44 ++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/research/evaluations/language-pilot-01/human-review/review-bernd-worsch-2026-10-19.json b/research/evaluations/language-pilot-01/human-review/review-bernd-worsch-2026-10-19.json index c60121c..ec4bcd0 100644 --- a/research/evaluations/language-pilot-01/human-review/review-bernd-worsch-2026-10-19.json +++ b/research/evaluations/language-pilot-01/human-review/review-bernd-worsch-2026-10-19.json @@ -189,40 +189,42 @@ { "answer": "S06-U", "scores": { - "C1": null, - "C2": null, - "R": null, - "Q": null + "C1": 1, + "C2": 1, + "R": 1, + "Q": 0 }, "evidence": { - "C1": null, - "C2": null, - "R": null, - "Q": null + "C1": "Reviewer: yes \u2014 'cannot guarantee edits survive device loss or complete power failure'.", + "C2": "Reviewer: yes, but without naming backup as a specific feature \u2014 'risks data loss'.", + "R": "Reviewer: yes, but wording should be more specific about providing conflict comparison and resolution facilities; stated only indirectly via a change in risk. Abstract wording may help generality but sacrifices specificity and ease of understanding; an example could establish both.", + "Q": "Reviewer: no \u2014 does not establish a backup facility requirement." }, - "unsupported_claims": null, - "suspected_condition_leakage": null, + "unsupported_claims": [], + "suspected_condition_leakage": "none", "notes": null }, { "answer": "S06-V", "scores": { - "C1": null, - "C2": null, - "R": null, - "Q": null + "C1": 1, + "C2": 1, + "R": 1, + "Q": 0 }, "evidence": { - "C1": null, - "C2": null, - "R": null, - "Q": null + "C1": "Reviewer: yes \u2014 'local transaction only handles process restarts'.", + "C2": "Reviewer: yes, but without naming backup as a specific feature \u2014 'insufficient for robust recovery'.", + "R": "Reviewer: yes, but wording should be more specific about providing conflict comparison and resolution facilities; stated only indirectly via a change in risk. Abstract wording may help generality but sacrifices specificity and ease of understanding; an example could establish both.", + "Q": "Reviewer: no \u2014 does not establish a backup facility requirement." }, - "unsupported_claims": null, - "suspected_condition_leakage": null, + "unsupported_claims": [], + "suspected_condition_leakage": "none", "notes": null } ], "review_mode": "Interview: Claude Code presented each brief, answer and criterion in turn and recorded the reviewer's own judgements verbatim; Claude supplied no scores or hints.", - "reviewer_declaration": "I have not seen scores for these answers and will provide my best judgement as founder of Binky Hedgehog GmbH." + "reviewer_declaration": "I have not seen scores for these answers and will provide my best judgement as founder of Binky Hedgehog GmbH.", + "coverage": "complete: all 12 answers (S01-S06, U and V)", + "submitted_at": "2026-10-19" }