Reduce research calls with screened reuse and draft VC-02 walkthrough
Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a0cffe-206f-7323-89d3-b20ca4cf4bf9
This commit is contained in:
parent
ad6f8fa600
commit
cfa249ab13
49 changed files with 3284 additions and 207 deletions
|
|
@ -58,3 +58,14 @@ were rejected. See [evidence/dispositions](../reviews/LocalFirstEvidenceExpansio
|
|||
The expanded evidence also refines Local Authority: local persistence, remote-version
|
||||
selection, semantic resolution and backup are separate concerns. A primary local
|
||||
copy does not make every local edit globally authoritative.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Application-driven drafts — 2026-09-25
|
||||
|
||||
[VC-02](../walkthroughs/VC02-OfflineFieldNotes.md) connects Conflict Copy with three
|
||||
new hypothesis research drafts: [Local Commit Boundary](../candidates/LocalCommitBoundary.md),
|
||||
[Pending Synchronization](../candidates/PendingSynchronization.md), and
|
||||
[Explicit Reconciliation](../candidates/ExplicitReconciliation.md). Their exact
|
||||
transaction/retry/UI contracts are proposed, not inferred implementation guarantees.
|
||||
No FEP IDs or canonical edges. Test whether Explicit Reconciliation deserves a
|
||||
separate pattern; full admission remains open.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue