coulomb/frontend-patterns
5
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Audit prospective comparison readiness and retain effort gaps

Browse source 
Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-6.1-sol
Assistant-Session: 01a1045b-933d-7aa1-b2db-104557487a79
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-10-04 03:02:53 +02:00
parent 280c1d38bf
commit d8d3a22b54
9 changed files with 439 additions and 54 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

36
workplans/FEP-WP-0006-language-evolution.md
View file

@ -4,11 +4,11 @@ type: workplan
title: "Make ongoing language learning observable"
domain: infotech
repo: frontend-patterns
status: backlog
status: blocked
owner: codex
topic_slug: canon
created: "2026-09-26"
updated: "2026-10-03"
updated: "2026-10-04"
state_hub_workstream_id: "528d24c1-c2c4-5914-a065-992b0dd877c8"
---
@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ state_hub_workstream_id: "528d24c1-c2c4-5914-a065-992b0dd877c8"
User-approved baseline, learning ledger and generated evolution report. Finite
investigations support an ongoing language; no composite maturity score or automatic
promotion. M1/M2 and independent human validation remain open in WP-0002/WP-0003.
promotion. M1/M2 and independent human validation remain open in WP-0009/WP-0003.
## Establish the versioned evidence baseline
@ -50,8 +50,7 @@ experiment receipts. Intent/protocol/program now describe continuous learning.
```task
id: FEP-WP-0006-T03
status: wait
depends_on: [FEP-WP-0003-T01]
blocking_reason: "Registers a bounded cycle before FEP-WP-0003-T01's next investigation."
blocking_reason: "Needs useful comparable prospective evidence and an explicit protocol/returns review from WP-0003 or consumer-led WP-0008; largest declared group has two cycles, one with unknown effort."
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "2c5c4bae-a0a9-54bf-ac86-49b2803fdd8c"
```
@ -220,3 +219,30 @@ when useful research under existing WP-0003 T01 or consumer-led WP-0008 supplies
comparable window with honest effort accounting. Do not restart the paused navigation
fixture or manufacture repeated studies merely to close T03. No new task/workplan;
no diminishing-returns, independent-human or maturity claim.
## Resumed measurement audit — 2026-10-04
The user explicitly resumed this workplan from backlog. Reviewed the current ledger,
registered cycle protocols and reporting implementation. T01/T02 and substantive
review-date reconciliation remain complete. Eight prospective cycles occupy seven
declared groups; B-independent-navigation-source-v1 has LEARN-0014/0017, with
LEARN-0017's effort honestly unknown. No complete three-cycle window exists.
Implemented a deterministic [window audit](../research/evolution/ComparisonWindows.json)
alongside the evolution report: ordered cycle IDs, protocol references, outcome
counts, positive/unknown/zero effort, qualitative review triggers and complete-window
effort readiness. A matching group label no longer appears to establish comparability.
Three declared entries trigger protocol review; missing effort still permits scoped
qualitative review but cannot silently produce an effort comparison. Regression cases
cover unknown/zero time, nonconsequential outcomes, mixed streams, retrospective
exclusion, ordering and stale generated audit rejection. The cycle template now asks
why a follow-up is useful and requires accounting gaps to stay visible.
This is measurement infrastructure, not a new empirical learning cycle; no ledger
outcome, candidate freshness, maturity or missing historical time is invented. Updated
the report's open-work references to the live M1 owner WP-0009 and consumer-led WP-0008.
Removed the stale exclusive dependency on parked WP-0003 T01: either owner can supply
useful comparable evidence under its existing scope. No downstream research gate is
waived. T03 remains wait and the resumed workplan is blocked on that evidence; the
paused navigation fixture stays paused. Existing work records retain the next useful
research and returns review; no replacement backlog is created.