Test competing navigation ownership and review research thread
Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a0cffe-206f-7323-89d3-b20ca4cf4bf9
This commit is contained in:
parent
e484cae45f
commit
e8ccb73a12
22 changed files with 4981 additions and 13 deletions
|
|
@ -410,6 +410,46 @@
|
|||
"cost_usd": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
"supersedes": []
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "LEARN-0013",
|
||||
"date": "2026-09-27",
|
||||
"recording": "prospective",
|
||||
"stream": "F",
|
||||
"comparison_group": "F-navigation-ownership-v1",
|
||||
"protocol_ref": "research/evolution/cycles/2026-09-27-navigation-ownership.md",
|
||||
"question": "Can obsolete history/navigation completions affect newer intent, and does separating completion ownership from focus ownership prevent it?",
|
||||
"previous_belief": "The single-response continuation policy preserved newer search focus but left competing history/success/error completions unresolved; focus-at-swap alone might not be sufficient.",
|
||||
"conclusion": "Revise operational guidance: validate navigation ownership before content/URL/title/feedback effects, including stale errors and newer failure, independently of focus permission. Prior policy misses obligations in 12/12 adversarial rows; authored guard meets 12/12. Pause fixture work for independent source contrast.",
|
||||
"disposition": "revision",
|
||||
"affected_patterns": [
|
||||
"CAND-0009",
|
||||
"CAND-0010",
|
||||
"CAND-0016"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"evidence": [
|
||||
"research/reviews/NavigationOwnershipExperiment.md",
|
||||
"research/reviews/NavigationThreadReview.md",
|
||||
"research/experiments/navigation-history/ownership-result.json",
|
||||
"research/evolution/cycles/2026-09-27-navigation-ownership-effort.json"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
||||
"One authored htmx family and author-model review, not production recurrence or AT validation.",
|
||||
"History adapter is pinned implementation-dependent; pending-state, multiple-miss and lifecycle limits remain open.",
|
||||
"Three distinct protocols are not a comparable diminishing-returns window."
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reviewer": {
|
||||
"name": "Codex",
|
||||
"role": "author-model",
|
||||
"independent_human": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"effort": {
|
||||
"research_minutes": 13.918,
|
||||
"execution_minutes": 1.238,
|
||||
"reported_tokens": null,
|
||||
"cost_usd": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
"supersedes": []
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue