# Source review — <title>

Status: queued | extracted | reviewed
Reviewer and review date:
Research question / hypothesis:
Potential disconfirming evidence:

## Source identity

- Author / publisher:
- Title:
- URL or bibliographic locator:
- Publication date / version:
- Access date:
- Primary or secondary source; independence from other sources:

## Claims

| Label | Source claim (paraphrase) | Section/page/revision | Assumptions | Our interpretation |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C01 | | | | |

## Candidate patterns and forces

Link candidates and explain competing forces, recurrence and resulting contexts.

## Counterevidence and limits

Separate observed counterexamples from hypothetical ones. Record inaccessible evidence.

## Conclusion and next action

Support, revise, reject or defer the hypothesis; explain why. Link the question
ledger, candidate/source catalogs and any follow-up work record.