# Fresh presentation replication 02

WP-0009 T02 implementation: six new authored variants, six atomic criteria per
scenario, two equivalent guidance presentations and twelve isolated prompts.
The prior consumed pilot remains separate and unchanged. This replication is not
held-out M3 retrieval, a real consumer use or independent human validation.

The [protocol](protocol.md) defines interpretation and budgets;
[scenarios](scenarios.json) define the frozen obligations and prohibited claims.
`pack-equivalence.json` records shared body/source hashes. `freeze.json` pins all
inputs, prompts, assignment and code plus immutable reference version/corpus/package.
The public assignment supports auditing but makes future masking procedural.

Commands from the repository root:

```bash
make replication-check replication-test
```

The user authorized up to twelve llm-connect calls at a requested 1,400-output-token
cap per call with no retries. Execution occurs only after a committed freeze:

```bash
PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 ../infospace-bench/.venv/bin/python scripts/language_replication.py run --max-calls 12
```

The runner reserves attempts before requests. A second invocation skips every reserved
session and can call only unstarted sessions within the aggregate ceiling; it never
retries a failed/interrupted attempt. Raw receipts preserve usage, model identity,
output hashes and failed responses. Scoring reads `masked/` before opening the key.
Copy the empty `scores-template.json`, disclose reviewer role and prior exposure,
record binary scores with quotes/locators and reasons, and list unsupported claims
separately. Null means unavailable or unreviewed; it is never a default zero.

```bash
python3 scripts/language_replication.py scores-check --scores <review-file.json> --complete
python3 scripts/language_replication.py summarize --scores <review-file.json>
```

Validation checks structure and retained quotations/hashes; it does not assess semantic
correctness or independently authenticate a declared reviewer. Keep initial ratings,
disagreements and adjudication. A failed pair is excluded from quality counts, and no
score automatically completes human review or M1. Actual execution/editorial outcomes
are recorded here after the authorized run; independent-human scores remain pending.