---
id: FEP-WP-0003
type: workplan
title: "Challenge the language across architectural schools"
domain: infotech
repo: frontend-patterns
status: proposed
owner: codex
topic_slug: canon
created: "2026-09-24"
updated: "2026-09-24"
state_hub_workstream_id: "13c123f1-a470-560e-ab8e-b270c387930a"
---

# Challenge the language across architectural schools

Part of `research/plan/ResearchProgram.md`. Phase prerequisite: FEP-WP-0002's evidence
gate. This is planned follow-up, not an active background execution request.
Individual task descriptions identify any work that can start earlier.

## Compare the six research streams

```task
id: FEP-WP-0003-T01
status: todo
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "f7a7eea5-5055-545b-a957-55ee4d17a256"
```

Build a source coverage matrix for streams A–F in ResearchProgram.md. Complete a primary-source review for each stream, including disagreements and independent known uses. Q05 and Q06 guide the comparison; source counts alone do not establish coverage.

## Complete contrasting architecture walkthroughs

```task
id: FEP-WP-0003-T02
status: todo
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "05de53b6-1771-5137-9602-bf614cb1bf0a"
```

After the M1 review, complete VC-03 through VC-06 using the walkthrough template. Mark coverage of VC-07 through VC-10 with evidence and gaps. Revise sequences and architecture decompositions where constraints break the current model.

## Review pattern and ontology changes

```task
id: FEP-WP-0003-T03
status: todo
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "2b7252c1-c453-5050-96fb-d86a3f3df0f0"
```

Record retain/merge/split/reject decisions, revised relations, quality constraints and counterexamples. Write research/reviews/M2-CoverageReview.md against the M2 gate; hand unresolved questions into live work records before closing.