tegwick
9baf6f1829
Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a0e738-9e15-7600-87e6-90dec3a7beef
1530 lines
69 KiB
JSON
1530 lines
69 KiB
JSON
{
|
||
"schema_version": 1,
|
||
"id": "cycle-2026-09-28-storage-receiver",
|
||
"source_revision": "aea97969087d3a8070a25e471e739ed0c9326700",
|
||
"assessment": {
|
||
"profiles": {
|
||
"schema_version": 1,
|
||
"assessed_at": "2026-09-28",
|
||
"profiles": [
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "CAND-0001",
|
||
"path": "research/candidates/ConflictCopy.md",
|
||
"title": "Conflict Copy",
|
||
"sha256": "24f250d89ac17d96df287d67c275b5320b48c8356b57ae126a6c941e92a1c6e9",
|
||
"status": "draft",
|
||
"maturity": "hypothesis",
|
||
"decision": "Preserve competing versions instead of silently losing one.",
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "documentary",
|
||
"family": "Joplin",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/LocalFirstEvidenceExpansion.md",
|
||
"scope": "Documented detected-note conflict copy."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "documentary",
|
||
"family": "Obsidian",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/LocalFirstEvidenceExpansion.md",
|
||
"scope": "Optional conflict-file mode, not default behavior."
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"independent_full_contract_uses": null,
|
||
"review": {
|
||
"assessed_at": "2026-09-27",
|
||
"reviewer": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false,
|
||
"last_substantive_review_date": "2026-09-27",
|
||
"substantive_review_ref": "research/reviews/M1-SeedReview.md",
|
||
"substantive_review_scope": "Editorial review of the connected core; M1 revise/defer."
|
||
},
|
||
"gaps": [
|
||
"Authorized retention and export are separate decisions.",
|
||
"Complete contract recurrence and fault-tested deployed behavior remain unverified."
|
||
],
|
||
"superseded_by": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "CAND-0002",
|
||
"path": "research/candidates/LocalCommitBoundary.md",
|
||
"title": "Local Commit Boundary",
|
||
"sha256": "22165fc2979e8f4d8859b34417cb71e7b5ec7a8440ad045aee2383d499648013",
|
||
"status": "draft",
|
||
"maturity": "hypothesis",
|
||
"decision": "Define when a local change is durably accepted.",
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "documentary",
|
||
"family": "Ink & Switch",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/LocalFirstEvidenceExpansion.md",
|
||
"scope": "Local-first motivation."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "documentary",
|
||
"family": "Joplin",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/LocalFirstEvidenceExpansion.md",
|
||
"scope": "Local storage and synchronization architecture."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "runtime",
|
||
"family": "authored SQLite / Git recovery fixture",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/StorageReceiverRecovery.md",
|
||
"scope": "SQLite WAL/FULL: pre-commit process kill rolls back; post-commit kill preserves document and outbox. No power-loss/backup proof."
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"independent_full_contract_uses": null,
|
||
"review": {
|
||
"assessed_at": "2026-09-28",
|
||
"reviewer": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false,
|
||
"last_substantive_review_date": "2026-09-28",
|
||
"substantive_review_ref": "research/reviews/StorageReceiverRecovery.md",
|
||
"substantive_review_scope": "SQLite WAL/FULL: pre-commit process kill rolls back; post-commit kill preserves document and outbox. No power-loss/backup proof."
|
||
},
|
||
"gaps": [
|
||
"Process-kill recovery observed in SQLite fixture; power-loss, device-loss backup and full frontend contract remain unverified.",
|
||
"Local acceptance is not off-device recovery."
|
||
],
|
||
"superseded_by": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "CAND-0003",
|
||
"path": "research/candidates/PendingSynchronization.md",
|
||
"title": "Pending Synchronization",
|
||
"sha256": "9c5cb0f4ea4e6f4406ce55513ca2c252172427a49d8280ae1a9c713f1d11b070",
|
||
"status": "draft",
|
||
"maturity": "hypothesis",
|
||
"decision": "Keep accepted local intent visible until synchronization resolves.",
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "documentary",
|
||
"family": "Joplin",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/LocalFirstEvidenceExpansion.md",
|
||
"scope": "Per-item synchronization metadata."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "runtime",
|
||
"family": "authored SQLite / Git recovery fixture",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/StorageReceiverRecovery.md",
|
||
"scope": "SQLite atomic supersession/restart plus Git identity replay after lost local acknowledgement; one authored integration, no frontend recurrence."
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"independent_full_contract_uses": null,
|
||
"review": {
|
||
"assessed_at": "2026-09-28",
|
||
"reviewer": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false,
|
||
"last_substantive_review_date": "2026-09-28",
|
||
"substantive_review_ref": "research/reviews/StorageReceiverRecovery.md",
|
||
"substantive_review_scope": "SQLite atomic supersession/restart plus Git identity replay after lost local acknowledgement; one authored integration, no frontend recurrence."
|
||
},
|
||
"gaps": [
|
||
"Atomic supersession observed in SQLite fixture; concurrent in-flight supersession, UI states and general receiver retention remain unverified."
|
||
],
|
||
"superseded_by": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "CAND-0004",
|
||
"path": "research/candidates/ExplicitReconciliation.md",
|
||
"title": "Explicit Reconciliation",
|
||
"sha256": "d48a40aab7417b8b8f8406094c84b9e90d0ca8c2f94d6e616d0b80499dc04959",
|
||
"status": "draft",
|
||
"maturity": "hypothesis",
|
||
"decision": "Resolve divergent content while retaining provenance.",
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "documentary",
|
||
"family": "Joplin",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/LocalFirstEvidenceExpansion.md",
|
||
"scope": "Documented manual conflict resolution."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "documentary",
|
||
"family": "Obsidian",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/LocalFirstEvidenceExpansion.md",
|
||
"scope": "Conflict comparison workflow."
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"independent_full_contract_uses": null,
|
||
"review": {
|
||
"assessed_at": "2026-09-27",
|
||
"reviewer": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false,
|
||
"last_substantive_review_date": "2026-09-27",
|
||
"substantive_review_ref": "research/reviews/M1-SeedReview.md",
|
||
"substantive_review_scope": "Editorial review of the connected core; M1 revise/defer."
|
||
},
|
||
"gaps": [
|
||
"Atomic resolution/provenance UI not executed.",
|
||
"Overlap with Conflict Copy remains an open merge question."
|
||
],
|
||
"superseded_by": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "CAND-0005",
|
||
"path": "research/candidates/LocalDraftState.md",
|
||
"title": "Local Draft State",
|
||
"sha256": "8e5f427975c76083c80b895bc68b7130b249be5129c2854f3df11cc374b4b240",
|
||
"status": "draft",
|
||
"maturity": "hypothesis",
|
||
"decision": "Separate unfinished intent from refreshed authoritative data.",
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "documentary",
|
||
"family": "Kubernetes / GitLab / React Router",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/TransactionalEvidenceExpansion.md",
|
||
"scope": "Rejection and pending-input mechanisms motivate recovery."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "static-code",
|
||
"family": "Zulip",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/FrontendRecoveryImplementations.md",
|
||
"scope": "Pinned composer draft storage; partial lifecycle."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "static-code",
|
||
"family": "Element / Matrix",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/FrontendRecoveryImplementations.md",
|
||
"scope": "Pinned composer draft restoration; partial lifecycle."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "runtime",
|
||
"family": "authored release fixture",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/ActivationConflictsAndReload.md",
|
||
"scope": "Same-tab preservation/refusal/discard and post-navigation schema check."
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"independent_full_contract_uses": null,
|
||
"review": {
|
||
"assessed_at": "2026-09-27",
|
||
"reviewer": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false,
|
||
"last_substantive_review_date": "2026-09-27",
|
||
"substantive_review_ref": "research/reviews/M1-SeedReview.md",
|
||
"substantive_review_scope": "Editorial review of the connected core; M1 revise/defer."
|
||
},
|
||
"gaps": [
|
||
"No native-unload, crash, multiple-tab or access-revocation guarantee.",
|
||
"Full base/draft/current merge contract is not verified in deployed frontends."
|
||
],
|
||
"superseded_by": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "CAND-0006",
|
||
"path": "research/candidates/VersionCheckedMutation.md",
|
||
"title": "Version-Checked Mutation",
|
||
"sha256": "6a3335ae2fa1de51c95dcbfa8d766d988a3f7a9604fb608b8a0bcf9a10b64198",
|
||
"status": "draft",
|
||
"maturity": "hypothesis",
|
||
"decision": "Reject an operation whose observed base is stale.",
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "documentary",
|
||
"family": "Kubernetes",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/TransactionalEvidenceExpansion.md",
|
||
"scope": "Conditional PUT; precise version mechanism."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "documentary",
|
||
"family": "GitLab",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/TransactionalEvidenceExpansion.md",
|
||
"scope": "Optional last_commit_id; different failure surface."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "runtime",
|
||
"family": "authored release fixture",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/ActivationConflictsAndReload.md",
|
||
"scope": "Related conditional activation-map mechanism in one process, not the full frontend pattern."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "runtime",
|
||
"family": "authored SQLite / Git recovery fixture",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/StorageReceiverRecovery.md",
|
||
"scope": "Actual Git receive-pack rejects a forced divergent branch update; related ancestry mechanism, not exact-version frontend semantics."
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"independent_full_contract_uses": null,
|
||
"review": {
|
||
"assessed_at": "2026-09-28",
|
||
"reviewer": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false,
|
||
"last_substantive_review_date": "2026-09-28",
|
||
"substantive_review_ref": "research/reviews/StorageReceiverRecovery.md",
|
||
"substantive_review_scope": "Actual Git receive-pack rejects a forced divergent branch update; related ancestry mechanism, not exact-version frontend semantics."
|
||
},
|
||
"gaps": [
|
||
"Distributed atomicity and complete frontend recurrence remain unverified.",
|
||
"Refetch does not authorize overwriting conflicting intent."
|
||
],
|
||
"superseded_by": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "CAND-0007",
|
||
"path": "research/candidates/MutationOutcomeTracking.md",
|
||
"title": "Mutation Outcome Tracking",
|
||
"sha256": "e04cb835fd054bfaf88616375bd0262deffb2801ea04105be92543bfa9582179",
|
||
"status": "draft",
|
||
"maturity": "hypothesis",
|
||
"decision": "Retain operation identity when transport outcome is uncertain.",
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "documentary",
|
||
"family": "Stripe",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/TransactionalEvidenceExpansion.md",
|
||
"scope": "Idempotency mechanism."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "documentary",
|
||
"family": "React Router",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/TransactionalEvidenceExpansion.md",
|
||
"scope": "Cancellation does not imply server rollback."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "static-code",
|
||
"family": "Zulip",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/FrontendRecoveryImplementations.md",
|
||
"scope": "Pinned send/recovery state."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "static-code",
|
||
"family": "Element / Matrix",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/FrontendRecoveryImplementations.md",
|
||
"scope": "Pinned client and SDK transaction/echo paths."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "runtime",
|
||
"family": "Element / Matrix",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/MatrixRecoveryExperiment.md",
|
||
"scope": "Real SDK with synthetic transport: lost acknowledgement, identity reuse and authoritative echo."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "runtime",
|
||
"family": "authored SQLite / Git recovery fixture",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/StorageReceiverRecovery.md",
|
||
"scope": "Actual Git same-commit replay is a no-op, reachable identity survives GC, fresh identity repeats intent; no arbitrary operation ledger."
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"independent_full_contract_uses": null,
|
||
"review": {
|
||
"assessed_at": "2026-09-28",
|
||
"reviewer": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false,
|
||
"last_substantive_review_date": "2026-09-28",
|
||
"substantive_review_ref": "research/reviews/StorageReceiverRecovery.md",
|
||
"substantive_review_scope": "Actual Git same-commit replay is a no-op, reachable identity survives GC, fresh identity repeats intent; no arbitrary operation ledger."
|
||
},
|
||
"gaps": [
|
||
"No production server deduplication or complete retention-window guarantee.",
|
||
"Cancelling local UI is not remote compensation."
|
||
],
|
||
"superseded_by": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "CAND-0008",
|
||
"path": "research/candidates/InvalidateAndReproject.md",
|
||
"title": "Invalidate and Reproject",
|
||
"sha256": "47c405adbc3caac2383768ed3d30b6a2e7ff1f44f4954c340049e78944227844",
|
||
"status": "draft",
|
||
"maturity": "hypothesis",
|
||
"decision": "Refresh a projection after mutation without equating acceptance and visibility.",
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "documentary",
|
||
"family": "React Router",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/TransactionalEvidenceExpansion.md",
|
||
"scope": "Concurrency and pending-state guidance."
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"independent_full_contract_uses": null,
|
||
"review": {
|
||
"assessed_at": "2026-09-27",
|
||
"reviewer": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false,
|
||
"last_substantive_review_date": "2026-09-27",
|
||
"substantive_review_ref": "research/reviews/M1-SeedReview.md",
|
||
"substantive_review_scope": "Editorial review of the connected core; M1 revise/defer."
|
||
},
|
||
"gaps": [
|
||
"Read-your-write and acceptance/refresh distinction still proposed.",
|
||
"No independent deployed full-contract observation."
|
||
],
|
||
"superseded_by": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "CAND-0009",
|
||
"path": "research/candidates/URLAddressableState.md",
|
||
"title": "URL-addressable State",
|
||
"sha256": "07d524c3c0dd080bd42ff5dd79a36e6ecd2a8654f07ece880b483477f7ca4497",
|
||
"status": "draft",
|
||
"maturity": "hypothesis",
|
||
"decision": "Make a navigable state reconstructible from its URL.",
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "documentary",
|
||
"family": "htmx",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/NavigationRenderingEvidence.md",
|
||
"scope": "History behavior and history-cache misses."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "documentary",
|
||
"family": "Web platform",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/NavigationRenderingEvidence.md",
|
||
"scope": "pushState changes history, not server dereferenceability."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "runtime",
|
||
"family": "htmx in authored public-catalog fixture",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/NavigationHistoryExperiment.md",
|
||
"scope": "NH01–NH06: native/enhanced routes, history hit/miss, actual browser cache ordering and missing-Vary negative control; explicit Node validator checks separate."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "runtime",
|
||
"family": "htmx in authored public-catalog fixture",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/NavigationOwnershipExperiment.md",
|
||
"scope": "NO01–NO06: ordered history/success/error races, prior policy 0/12 full obligations versus guarded 12/12; separate focus ownership. Same fixture family; pinned history-XHR adapter."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "static-code",
|
||
"family": "Zulip",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/ZulipNavigationSourceStudy.md",
|
||
"scope": "ZN01–ZN08 at pinned revision: partial hash/list/cache mechanisms and non-modal continuation contrast. No application/test execution, no no-script claim, no complete pattern recurrence."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "static-code",
|
||
"family": "Zulip",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/ZulipTargetLookupCallPath.md",
|
||
"scope": "ZT01-ZT04: traced target-message-lookup and anchor-navigation continuations to their unconditional completion points; no captured-list guard or test coverage located. No reproduction or application execution."
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"independent_full_contract_uses": null,
|
||
"review": {
|
||
"assessed_at": "2026-09-27",
|
||
"reviewer": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false,
|
||
"last_substantive_review_date": "2026-09-27",
|
||
"substantive_review_ref": "research/reviews/ZulipTargetLookupCallPath.md",
|
||
"substantive_review_scope": "Traced call-path corroboration of the previously flagged auxiliary-callback gap; still author-model, no application execution."
|
||
},
|
||
"gaps": [
|
||
"Independent application recurrence and human/AT validation remain unverified.",
|
||
"Pending history disclosure, multiple history misses, redirects, nonzero swap delays, bfcache, lifecycle cleanup, interrupted/late enhancement and offline availability remain open.",
|
||
"Zulip's target-lookup and anchor-navigation continuations have a traced absence of a captured-current-list guard and no located test coverage for a stale-navigation race (unreproduced, not a defect claim); deferred editing focus and search callback wiring remain separately unverified."
|
||
],
|
||
"superseded_by": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "CAND-0010",
|
||
"path": "research/candidates/ProgressiveEnhancement.md",
|
||
"title": "Progressive Enhancement",
|
||
"sha256": "1dc3885ef896b9a7cb61af11fa8893484eb1e13454207326abc7250d5ca4382b",
|
||
"status": "draft",
|
||
"maturity": "hypothesis",
|
||
"decision": "Keep essential actions usable when enhancement is unavailable.",
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "documentary",
|
||
"family": "htmx",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/NavigationRenderingEvidence.md",
|
||
"scope": "Boosted links and forms."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "documentary",
|
||
"family": "SvelteKit",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/NavigationRenderingEvidence.md",
|
||
"scope": "Form actions and rendering/page options."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "runtime",
|
||
"family": "htmx in authored public-catalog fixture",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/NavigationHistoryExperiment.md",
|
||
"scope": "NH01–NH06: native/enhanced routes, history hit/miss, actual browser cache ordering and missing-Vary negative control; explicit Node validator checks separate."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "runtime",
|
||
"family": "htmx in authored public-catalog fixture",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/NavigationFocusExperiment.md",
|
||
"scope": "NF01–NF06: Tab/Enter navigation, raw versus authored focus/status policy, held-response ownership and background update; DOM evidence only, not AT speech."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "runtime",
|
||
"family": "htmx in authored public-catalog fixture",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/NavigationOwnershipExperiment.md",
|
||
"scope": "NO01–NO06: ordered history/success/error races, prior policy 0/12 full obligations versus guarded 12/12; separate focus ownership. Same fixture family; pinned history-XHR adapter."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "static-code",
|
||
"family": "Zulip",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/ZulipNavigationSourceStudy.md",
|
||
"scope": "ZN01–ZN08 at pinned revision: partial hash/list/cache mechanisms and non-modal continuation contrast. No application/test execution, no no-script claim, no complete pattern recurrence."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "static-code",
|
||
"family": "Zulip",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/ZulipTargetLookupCallPath.md",
|
||
"scope": "ZT01-ZT04: traced target-message-lookup and anchor-navigation continuations to their unconditional completion points; no captured-list guard or test coverage located. No reproduction or application execution."
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"independent_full_contract_uses": null,
|
||
"review": {
|
||
"assessed_at": "2026-09-27",
|
||
"reviewer": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false,
|
||
"last_substantive_review_date": "2026-09-27",
|
||
"substantive_review_ref": "research/reviews/ZulipTargetLookupCallPath.md",
|
||
"substantive_review_scope": "Traced call-path corroboration of the previously flagged auxiliary-callback gap; still author-model, no application execution."
|
||
},
|
||
"gaps": [
|
||
"Independent application recurrence and human/AT validation remain unverified.",
|
||
"Pending history disclosure, multiple history misses, redirects, nonzero swap delays, bfcache, lifecycle cleanup, interrupted/late enhancement and offline availability remain open.",
|
||
"Zulip's target-lookup and anchor-navigation continuations have a traced absence of a captured-current-list guard and no located test coverage for a stale-navigation race (unreproduced, not a defect claim); deferred editing focus and search callback wiring remain separately unverified."
|
||
],
|
||
"superseded_by": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "CAND-0011",
|
||
"path": "research/candidates/PresentationModel.md",
|
||
"title": "Presentation Model",
|
||
"sha256": "5ff03b5799b0a9e5ec6b54b21034720d89dbc8ffde7c4cdcf71616cdf57baf49",
|
||
"status": "draft",
|
||
"maturity": "hypothesis",
|
||
"decision": "Separate presentation decisions from view mechanisms.",
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "documentary",
|
||
"family": "Fowler",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/PatternBreadthExpansion.md",
|
||
"scope": "Named pattern and illustrative model/view discussion."
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"independent_full_contract_uses": null,
|
||
"review": {
|
||
"assessed_at": "2026-09-27",
|
||
"reviewer": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false,
|
||
"last_substantive_review_date": "2026-09-26",
|
||
"substantive_review_ref": "research/reviews/PatternBreadthExpansion.md",
|
||
"substantive_review_scope": "Source normalization, decision probes and counterexamples."
|
||
},
|
||
"gaps": [
|
||
"No executed model/view integration or independently reviewed full-contract use."
|
||
],
|
||
"superseded_by": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "CAND-0012",
|
||
"path": "research/candidates/DerivedState.md",
|
||
"title": "Derived State",
|
||
"sha256": "9f29b9f1296a52b83f08dfd97437c4dc16e4949ddac1ff3b3830e3fc9831bd4f",
|
||
"status": "draft",
|
||
"maturity": "hypothesis",
|
||
"decision": "Compute a result from explicit authoritative inputs.",
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "documentary",
|
||
"family": "Redux",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/PatternBreadthExpansion.md",
|
||
"scope": "Selector guidance, not a requirement for a global store."
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"independent_full_contract_uses": null,
|
||
"review": {
|
||
"assessed_at": "2026-09-27",
|
||
"reviewer": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false,
|
||
"last_substantive_review_date": "2026-09-26",
|
||
"substantive_review_ref": "research/reviews/PatternBreadthExpansion.md",
|
||
"substantive_review_scope": "Source normalization, decision probes and counterexamples."
|
||
},
|
||
"gaps": [
|
||
"Snapshot coherence and changed-locale cache test still planned."
|
||
],
|
||
"superseded_by": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "CAND-0013",
|
||
"path": "research/candidates/VerticalFeatureSlice.md",
|
||
"title": "Vertical Feature Slice",
|
||
"sha256": "d6b332b9c104a079bd4b72512b8ddd1a889199b2e2e531753c411688053e647a",
|
||
"status": "draft",
|
||
"maturity": "hypothesis",
|
||
"decision": "Group a capability across UI, state and behavior with explicit interfaces.",
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "documentary",
|
||
"family": "Feature-Sliced Design",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/PatternBreadthExpansion.md",
|
||
"scope": "Layer/slice and public-interface guidance."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "static-code",
|
||
"family": "Feature-Sliced Design",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/FeatureDeploymentBoundaries.md",
|
||
"scope": "Pinned todo-app interfaces coexist with one application build."
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"independent_full_contract_uses": null,
|
||
"review": {
|
||
"assessed_at": "2026-09-27",
|
||
"reviewer": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false,
|
||
"last_substantive_review_date": "2026-09-26",
|
||
"substantive_review_ref": "research/reviews/FeatureDeploymentBoundaries.md",
|
||
"substantive_review_scope": "Static feature/import versus release-boundary assessment."
|
||
},
|
||
"gaps": [
|
||
"Build/import enforcement not executed.",
|
||
"Feature organization does not establish independent activation."
|
||
],
|
||
"superseded_by": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "CAND-0014",
|
||
"path": "research/candidates/IslandsOfInteractivity.md",
|
||
"title": "Islands of Interactivity",
|
||
"sha256": "821a1497da10c02ae11fa6f56cb8e205a4f32c40b39770ab8ca3f907561a260a",
|
||
"status": "draft",
|
||
"maturity": "hypothesis",
|
||
"decision": "Activate selected interactive regions within a document.",
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "documentary",
|
||
"family": "Astro",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/PatternBreadthExpansion.md",
|
||
"scope": "Client-island mechanism and execution placement."
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"independent_full_contract_uses": null,
|
||
"review": {
|
||
"assessed_at": "2026-09-27",
|
||
"reviewer": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false,
|
||
"last_substantive_review_date": "2026-09-26",
|
||
"substantive_review_ref": "research/reviews/PatternBreadthExpansion.md",
|
||
"substantive_review_scope": "Source normalization, decision probes and counterexamples."
|
||
},
|
||
"gaps": [
|
||
"No executed island fixture, performance comparison or complete recurrence study."
|
||
],
|
||
"superseded_by": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "CAND-0015",
|
||
"path": "research/candidates/FailureBoundary.md",
|
||
"title": "Failure Boundary",
|
||
"sha256": "a6e76ed17a92baade683d5df96fa8ecd066c593661e6a14983a86d046e7d9c2c",
|
||
"status": "draft",
|
||
"maturity": "hypothesis",
|
||
"decision": "Contain specified failure classes while preserving useful neighboring work.",
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "documentary",
|
||
"family": "React",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/PatternBreadthExpansion.md",
|
||
"scope": "Error boundary scope and exclusions."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "runtime",
|
||
"family": "React",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/BoundaryRecoveryExperiment.md",
|
||
"scope": "Real package in authored host: render/event/request distinction and fallback escalation."
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"independent_full_contract_uses": null,
|
||
"review": {
|
||
"assessed_at": "2026-09-27",
|
||
"reviewer": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false,
|
||
"last_substantive_review_date": "2026-09-26",
|
||
"substantive_review_ref": "research/reviews/BoundaryRecoveryExperiment.md",
|
||
"substantive_review_scope": "Authored runtime fixture and failure-class interpretation."
|
||
},
|
||
"gaps": [
|
||
"Synthetic host, not full application recurrence.",
|
||
"Boundary cannot imply containment for all asynchronous failures."
|
||
],
|
||
"superseded_by": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "CAND-0016",
|
||
"path": "research/candidates/FocusReturn.md",
|
||
"title": "Focus Return",
|
||
"sha256": "9149c2f563eafcfec983a9285949225840d97804568309bd16bbb1eb6b3dde77",
|
||
"status": "draft",
|
||
"maturity": "hypothesis",
|
||
"decision": "Restore meaningful focus after a temporary interaction ends.",
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "documentary",
|
||
"family": "WAI-ARIA APG",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/PatternBreadthExpansion.md",
|
||
"scope": "Dialog focus obligations."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "static-code",
|
||
"family": "Radix",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/NestedDismissalIsolation.md",
|
||
"scope": "Pinned layer/listener ownership implementation."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "runtime",
|
||
"family": "Radix",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/NestedOwnershipRouting.md",
|
||
"scope": "Authored fixture: raw 20/24 versus routed 24/24; browser/build limits retained."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "runtime",
|
||
"family": "htmx in authored public-catalog fixture",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/NavigationFocusExperiment.md",
|
||
"scope": "NF01–NF06: Tab/Enter navigation, raw versus authored focus/status policy, held-response ownership and background update; DOM evidence only, not AT speech."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "runtime",
|
||
"family": "htmx in authored public-catalog fixture",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/NavigationOwnershipExperiment.md",
|
||
"scope": "NO01–NO06: ordered history/success/error races, prior policy 0/12 full obligations versus guarded 12/12; separate focus ownership. Same fixture family; pinned history-XHR adapter."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "static-code",
|
||
"family": "Zulip",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/ZulipNavigationSourceStudy.md",
|
||
"scope": "ZN01–ZN08 at pinned revision: partial hash/list/cache mechanisms and non-modal continuation contrast. No application/test execution, no no-script claim, no complete pattern recurrence."
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"independent_full_contract_uses": null,
|
||
"review": {
|
||
"assessed_at": "2026-09-27",
|
||
"reviewer": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false,
|
||
"last_substantive_review_date": "2026-09-27",
|
||
"substantive_review_ref": "research/reviews/ZulipNavigationSourceStudy.md",
|
||
"substantive_review_scope": "Static navigation contrast; partial mechanisms, not independent full-contract use."
|
||
},
|
||
"gaps": [
|
||
"One implementation family; repeated trials are not independent uses.",
|
||
"Animated exits and competing owners remain untested; no production repair claim.",
|
||
"Route ownership is a contrast, not independent modal recurrence; AT speech and broader history/lifecycle cases remain unverified.",
|
||
"Zulip auxiliary target/anchor callbacks, deferred editing focus and search callback wiring remain unverified; static guards do not prove whole-application ownership."
|
||
],
|
||
"superseded_by": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "CAND-0017",
|
||
"path": "research/candidates/IndependentFeatureBoundary.md",
|
||
"title": "Independent Feature Boundary",
|
||
"sha256": "60b78725ed4036681675d4c68244fc25aea6e0dffb09d54a7108e3fcbf527b4f",
|
||
"status": "draft",
|
||
"maturity": "hypothesis",
|
||
"decision": "Separate feature release, activation and session transition contracts.",
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "documentary",
|
||
"family": "single-spa / webpack",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/FeatureDeploymentBoundaries.md",
|
||
"scope": "Mechanism documentation, not deployed independence proof."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "static-code",
|
||
"family": "react-microfrontends examples",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/FeatureDeploymentBoundaries.md",
|
||
"scope": "Root config/navbar are one example family with shared startup gating."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "runtime",
|
||
"family": "authored release fixture",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/FeatureReleaseExperiment.md",
|
||
"scope": "Publication/activation/rollback across fresh, loaded and lazy sessions."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "runtime",
|
||
"family": "authored release fixture",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/ActivationConflictsAndReload.md",
|
||
"scope": "Conditional activation updates and safe reload policies, including negative controls."
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"independent_full_contract_uses": null,
|
||
"review": {
|
||
"assessed_at": "2026-09-27",
|
||
"reviewer": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false,
|
||
"last_substantive_review_date": "2026-09-26",
|
||
"substantive_review_ref": "research/reviews/ActivationConflictsAndReload.md",
|
||
"substantive_review_scope": "Authored activation/reload experiment and guarantee limits."
|
||
},
|
||
"gaps": [
|
||
"No upstream deployment or real team/release-independence validation.",
|
||
"Distributed atomicity, retention authorization and native-unload/crash behavior remain open."
|
||
],
|
||
"superseded_by": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "CAND-0018",
|
||
"path": "research/candidates/CapabilityContractBoundary.md",
|
||
"title": "Capability Contract Boundary",
|
||
"sha256": "a678f88e9b53d7273e29e3aea2d23f2297055253dcf4518444d3089fa6da4331",
|
||
"status": "draft",
|
||
"maturity": "hypothesis",
|
||
"decision": "Declare a UI capability's semantic surface separately from its runtime-isolation mechanism.",
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "documentary",
|
||
"family": "Web Components",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/CapabilityContractSources.md",
|
||
"scope": "CC01: Custom Elements observedAttributes/lifecycle callback mechanism, narrower than a full semantic contract."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"kind": "documentary",
|
||
"family": "webpack",
|
||
"ref": "research/reviews/CapabilityContractSources.md",
|
||
"scope": "CC02: Module Federation expose/consume module and share-scope dependency-negotiation mechanism, one layer below any UI-facing contract."
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"independent_full_contract_uses": null,
|
||
"review": {
|
||
"assessed_at": "2026-09-27",
|
||
"reviewer": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false,
|
||
"last_substantive_review_date": "2026-09-27",
|
||
"substantive_review_ref": "research/reviews/CapabilityContractSources.md",
|
||
"substantive_review_scope": "Two real substrate specs read directly; the prompting AI-chat transcript is not evidence."
|
||
},
|
||
"gaps": [
|
||
"No known use of an explicit capability contract, as distinct from its substrate mechanisms, has been located.",
|
||
"Enforcement, versioning and compatibility checking are unverified; a contract with no tooling is only documentation.",
|
||
"Only one family per substrate mechanism inspected; no independent recurrence."
|
||
],
|
||
"superseded_by": []
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
},
|
||
"ledger": {
|
||
"schema_version": 1,
|
||
"coverage": "Ten selected retrospective outcomes (not a historical census), followed by prospectively registered bounded cycles. Retrospective effort remains unknown.",
|
||
"events": [
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "LEARN-0001",
|
||
"date": "2026-09-25",
|
||
"recording": "retrospective",
|
||
"stream": "D",
|
||
"comparison_group": null,
|
||
"question": "What do pinned recovery implementations establish?",
|
||
"previous_belief": "Documentary motivation did not locate draft/outcome mechanisms in frontend code.",
|
||
"conclusion": "Zulip and Element locate partial draft/outcome mechanisms; complete pattern recurrence is still unknown.",
|
||
"disposition": "revision",
|
||
"affected_patterns": [
|
||
"CAND-0005",
|
||
"CAND-0007"
|
||
],
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
"research/reviews/FrontendRecoveryImplementations.md"
|
||
],
|
||
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
||
"Deployed full lifecycle remains unverified."
|
||
],
|
||
"reviewer": {
|
||
"name": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false
|
||
},
|
||
"effort": {
|
||
"research_minutes": null,
|
||
"execution_minutes": null,
|
||
"reported_tokens": null,
|
||
"cost_usd": null
|
||
},
|
||
"supersedes": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "LEARN-0002",
|
||
"date": "2026-09-25",
|
||
"recording": "retrospective",
|
||
"stream": "D",
|
||
"comparison_group": null,
|
||
"question": "Does cancellation or a transport error settle mutation outcome?",
|
||
"previous_belief": "Recovery identity and authoritative echo required executable checks.",
|
||
"conclusion": "Synthetic transport with the real Matrix SDK distinguishes replay identity, duplicate commits and authoritative echo.",
|
||
"disposition": "revision",
|
||
"affected_patterns": [
|
||
"CAND-0007"
|
||
],
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
"research/reviews/MatrixRecoveryExperiment.md"
|
||
],
|
||
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
||
"No real server deduplication guarantee."
|
||
],
|
||
"reviewer": {
|
||
"name": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false
|
||
},
|
||
"effort": {
|
||
"research_minutes": null,
|
||
"execution_minutes": null,
|
||
"reported_tokens": null,
|
||
"cost_usd": null
|
||
},
|
||
"supersedes": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "LEARN-0003",
|
||
"date": "2026-09-26",
|
||
"recording": "retrospective",
|
||
"stream": "cross-stream",
|
||
"comparison_group": null,
|
||
"question": "Does naming patterns improve the frozen pilot decisions?",
|
||
"previous_belief": "Initial editorial scores were 21/24 named and 19/24 prose.",
|
||
"conclusion": "Submitted model review adjudication yields 18/24 in each condition; this does not establish equivalence or a presentation benefit.",
|
||
"disposition": "revision",
|
||
"affected_patterns": [
|
||
"CAND-0005",
|
||
"CAND-0007",
|
||
"CAND-0001",
|
||
"CAND-0002"
|
||
],
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
"research/evaluations/language-pilot-01/submitted-review-01/adjudication.md"
|
||
],
|
||
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
||
"Independent human validation pending.",
|
||
"Historical effort unknown; this entry does not allocate whole-pilot telemetry."
|
||
],
|
||
"reviewer": {
|
||
"name": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false
|
||
},
|
||
"effort": {
|
||
"research_minutes": null,
|
||
"execution_minutes": null,
|
||
"reported_tokens": null,
|
||
"cost_usd": null
|
||
},
|
||
"supersedes": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "LEARN-0004",
|
||
"date": "2026-09-26",
|
||
"recording": "retrospective",
|
||
"stream": "D",
|
||
"comparison_group": null,
|
||
"question": "Which recovery recommendations overstate their guarantees?",
|
||
"previous_belief": "Shared guidance left retention/export policy, cancellation and local backup boundaries insufficiently explicit.",
|
||
"conclusion": "Guidance now separates authorization, remote compensation, atomic supersession and off-device backup.",
|
||
"disposition": "revision",
|
||
"affected_patterns": [
|
||
"CAND-0001",
|
||
"CAND-0002",
|
||
"CAND-0003",
|
||
"CAND-0005",
|
||
"CAND-0007"
|
||
],
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
"research/reviews/SharedGuidanceRevision.md"
|
||
],
|
||
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
||
"Editorial correction is not new production evidence."
|
||
],
|
||
"reviewer": {
|
||
"name": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false
|
||
},
|
||
"effort": {
|
||
"research_minutes": null,
|
||
"execution_minutes": null,
|
||
"reported_tokens": null,
|
||
"cost_usd": null
|
||
},
|
||
"supersedes": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "LEARN-0005",
|
||
"date": "2026-09-26",
|
||
"recording": "retrospective",
|
||
"stream": "B",
|
||
"comparison_group": null,
|
||
"question": "What does URL/history and enhancement documentation actually promise?",
|
||
"previous_belief": "Navigation and rendering seeds lacked explicit dereferenceability and fallback distinctions.",
|
||
"conclusion": "Developed two hypotheses separating address-bar updates from direct loads, and HTML delivery from usable no-script actions.",
|
||
"disposition": "revision",
|
||
"affected_patterns": [
|
||
"CAND-0009",
|
||
"CAND-0010"
|
||
],
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
"research/reviews/NavigationRenderingEvidence.md"
|
||
],
|
||
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
||
"Navigation/history/cache runtime checks remain pending."
|
||
],
|
||
"reviewer": {
|
||
"name": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false
|
||
},
|
||
"effort": {
|
||
"research_minutes": null,
|
||
"execution_minutes": null,
|
||
"reported_tokens": null,
|
||
"cost_usd": null
|
||
},
|
||
"supersedes": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "LEARN-0006",
|
||
"date": "2026-09-26",
|
||
"recording": "retrospective",
|
||
"stream": "F",
|
||
"comparison_group": null,
|
||
"question": "Why can immediate nested dismissal close the outer task?",
|
||
"previous_belief": "The first fixture exposed a timing failure with unresolved ownership.",
|
||
"conclusion": "Trace locates stale Escape listener ownership despite inner registration/focus; a guard can lose input.",
|
||
"disposition": "revision",
|
||
"affected_patterns": [
|
||
"CAND-0016",
|
||
"CAND-0015"
|
||
],
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
"research/reviews/BoundaryRecoveryExperiment.md",
|
||
"research/reviews/NestedDismissalIsolation.md"
|
||
],
|
||
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
||
"Readiness waits are not a public product repair."
|
||
],
|
||
"reviewer": {
|
||
"name": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false
|
||
},
|
||
"effort": {
|
||
"research_minutes": null,
|
||
"execution_minutes": null,
|
||
"reported_tokens": null,
|
||
"cost_usd": null
|
||
},
|
||
"supersedes": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "LEARN-0007",
|
||
"date": "2026-09-26",
|
||
"recording": "retrospective",
|
||
"stream": "F",
|
||
"comparison_group": null,
|
||
"question": "Can event-time ownership route dismissal without a settling delay?",
|
||
"previous_belief": "Isolation supplied a mechanism but no lifecycle-safe candidate routing experiment.",
|
||
"conclusion": "Controlled fixture routed 24/24 versus raw 20/24; initial measurement error and corrected results retained.",
|
||
"disposition": "revision",
|
||
"affected_patterns": [
|
||
"CAND-0016"
|
||
],
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
"research/reviews/NestedOwnershipRouting.md"
|
||
],
|
||
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
||
"Animated exit and competing-owner coverage remain open."
|
||
],
|
||
"reviewer": {
|
||
"name": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false
|
||
},
|
||
"effort": {
|
||
"research_minutes": null,
|
||
"execution_minutes": null,
|
||
"reported_tokens": null,
|
||
"cost_usd": null
|
||
},
|
||
"supersedes": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "LEARN-0008",
|
||
"date": "2026-09-26",
|
||
"recording": "retrospective",
|
||
"stream": "E",
|
||
"comparison_group": null,
|
||
"question": "Are feature organization and independent activation the same boundary?",
|
||
"previous_belief": "The feature-slice hypothesis needed a source-layout/release contrast.",
|
||
"conclusion": "Pinned examples distinguish organizational slicing from activation contracts; added Independent Feature Boundary.",
|
||
"disposition": "revision",
|
||
"affected_patterns": [
|
||
"CAND-0013",
|
||
"CAND-0017"
|
||
],
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
"research/reviews/FeatureDeploymentBoundaries.md"
|
||
],
|
||
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
||
"Shared startup dependencies still couple nominally separate features."
|
||
],
|
||
"reviewer": {
|
||
"name": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false
|
||
},
|
||
"effort": {
|
||
"research_minutes": null,
|
||
"execution_minutes": null,
|
||
"reported_tokens": null,
|
||
"cost_usd": null
|
||
},
|
||
"supersedes": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "LEARN-0009",
|
||
"date": "2026-09-26",
|
||
"recording": "retrospective",
|
||
"stream": "E",
|
||
"comparison_group": null,
|
||
"question": "Does publication or rollback update every session?",
|
||
"previous_belief": "Static source review could not establish loaded/lazy-session behavior.",
|
||
"conclusion": "Native-module experiment distinguishes publication, activation and already-bound sessions; artifact retirement breaks old lazy sessions.",
|
||
"disposition": "revision",
|
||
"affected_patterns": [
|
||
"CAND-0017"
|
||
],
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
"research/reviews/FeatureReleaseExperiment.md"
|
||
],
|
||
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
||
"No CDN or upstream deployment validation."
|
||
],
|
||
"reviewer": {
|
||
"name": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false
|
||
},
|
||
"effort": {
|
||
"research_minutes": null,
|
||
"execution_minutes": null,
|
||
"reported_tokens": null,
|
||
"cost_usd": null
|
||
},
|
||
"supersedes": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "LEARN-0010",
|
||
"date": "2026-09-26",
|
||
"recording": "retrospective",
|
||
"stream": "E",
|
||
"comparison_group": null,
|
||
"question": "How do stale activation writers and unfinished drafts constrain updates?",
|
||
"previous_belief": "Release experiment left activation conflicts and reload policy unexecuted.",
|
||
"conclusion": "Conditional replacement rejects stale writers; explicit reload policies preserve or refuse transition, with schema recheck after navigation.",
|
||
"disposition": "revision",
|
||
"affected_patterns": [
|
||
"CAND-0017",
|
||
"CAND-0005",
|
||
"CAND-0006"
|
||
],
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
"research/reviews/ActivationConflictsAndReload.md"
|
||
],
|
||
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
||
"One-process atomicity; no native unload, crash or real remote-outcome coverage."
|
||
],
|
||
"reviewer": {
|
||
"name": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false
|
||
},
|
||
"effort": {
|
||
"research_minutes": null,
|
||
"execution_minutes": null,
|
||
"reported_tokens": null,
|
||
"cost_usd": null
|
||
},
|
||
"supersedes": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "LEARN-0011",
|
||
"date": "2026-09-27",
|
||
"recording": "prospective",
|
||
"stream": "B",
|
||
"comparison_group": "B-navigation-mechanism-v1",
|
||
"protocol_ref": "research/evolution/cycles/2026-09-27-navigation.md",
|
||
"question": "Can a public route preserve selection and complete-document availability across native/enhanced entry, history and HTTP caching?",
|
||
"previous_belief": "Native href/GET contracts plus representation-aware routing and cache selection should satisfy this narrow obligation; documentary support lacked runtime checks.",
|
||
"conclusion": "Corroborated in pinned htmx fixture: native and history paths work; missing Vary reproduces fragment-as-document reuse in both browsers. Existing obligations stand; no new pattern or promotion.",
|
||
"disposition": "corroboration",
|
||
"affected_patterns": [
|
||
"CAND-0009",
|
||
"CAND-0010"
|
||
],
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
"research/reviews/NavigationHistoryExperiment.md",
|
||
"research/experiments/navigation-history/result.json",
|
||
"research/evolution/cycles/2026-09-27-navigation-effort.json"
|
||
],
|
||
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
||
"One authored application, no independent recurrence or usefulness gain.",
|
||
"Accessibility, delayed scripts, interrupted transport, real intermediaries and offline availability remain open."
|
||
],
|
||
"reviewer": {
|
||
"name": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false
|
||
},
|
||
"effort": {
|
||
"research_minutes": 6.177,
|
||
"execution_minutes": 1.021,
|
||
"reported_tokens": null,
|
||
"cost_usd": null
|
||
},
|
||
"supersedes": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "LEARN-0012",
|
||
"date": "2026-09-27",
|
||
"recording": "prospective",
|
||
"stream": "F",
|
||
"comparison_group": "F-navigation-focus-v1",
|
||
"protocol_ref": "research/evolution/cycles/2026-09-27-navigation-focus.md",
|
||
"question": "Does enhanced route replacement need explicit continuation and feedback policy that respects changed focus ownership?",
|
||
"previous_belief": "Native controls alone do not establish enhanced focus/feedback semantics; delayed responses should respect focus moved to another surviving task. Modal return is not automatically route continuation.",
|
||
"conclusion": "Corroborated in 22 cases: raw same-ID link focus survives but this fragment contract leaves stale title and silent failure; authored heading/status policy works and preserves newer search focus. No AT speech or universal heading policy established.",
|
||
"disposition": "corroboration",
|
||
"affected_patterns": [
|
||
"CAND-0010",
|
||
"CAND-0016"
|
||
],
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
"research/reviews/NavigationFocusExperiment.md",
|
||
"research/experiments/navigation-history/focus-result.json",
|
||
"research/evolution/cycles/2026-09-27-navigation-focus-effort.json"
|
||
],
|
||
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
||
"Author-model DOM evidence, no human/AT validation or independent recurrence.",
|
||
"Delayed history focus, competing requests, delayed scripts and interrupted enhancement remain open."
|
||
],
|
||
"reviewer": {
|
||
"name": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false
|
||
},
|
||
"effort": {
|
||
"research_minutes": 5.138,
|
||
"execution_minutes": 0.525,
|
||
"reported_tokens": null,
|
||
"cost_usd": null
|
||
},
|
||
"supersedes": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "LEARN-0013",
|
||
"date": "2026-09-27",
|
||
"recording": "prospective",
|
||
"stream": "F",
|
||
"comparison_group": "F-navigation-ownership-v1",
|
||
"protocol_ref": "research/evolution/cycles/2026-09-27-navigation-ownership.md",
|
||
"question": "Can obsolete history/navigation completions affect newer intent, and does separating completion ownership from focus ownership prevent it?",
|
||
"previous_belief": "The single-response continuation policy preserved newer search focus but left competing history/success/error completions unresolved; focus-at-swap alone might not be sufficient.",
|
||
"conclusion": "Revise operational guidance: validate navigation ownership before content/URL/title/feedback effects, including stale errors and newer failure, independently of focus permission. Prior policy misses obligations in 12/12 adversarial rows; authored guard meets 12/12. Pause fixture work for independent source contrast.",
|
||
"disposition": "revision",
|
||
"affected_patterns": [
|
||
"CAND-0009",
|
||
"CAND-0010",
|
||
"CAND-0016"
|
||
],
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
"research/reviews/NavigationOwnershipExperiment.md",
|
||
"research/reviews/NavigationThreadReview.md",
|
||
"research/experiments/navigation-history/ownership-result.json",
|
||
"research/evolution/cycles/2026-09-27-navigation-ownership-effort.json"
|
||
],
|
||
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
||
"One authored htmx family and author-model review, not production recurrence or AT validation.",
|
||
"History adapter is pinned implementation-dependent; pending-state, multiple-miss and lifecycle limits remain open.",
|
||
"Three distinct protocols are not a comparable diminishing-returns window."
|
||
],
|
||
"reviewer": {
|
||
"name": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false
|
||
},
|
||
"effort": {
|
||
"research_minutes": 13.918,
|
||
"execution_minutes": 1.238,
|
||
"reported_tokens": null,
|
||
"cost_usd": null
|
||
},
|
||
"supersedes": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "LEARN-0014",
|
||
"date": "2026-09-27",
|
||
"recording": "prospective",
|
||
"stream": "B",
|
||
"comparison_group": "B-independent-navigation-source-v1",
|
||
"protocol_ref": "research/evolution/cycles/2026-09-27-zulip-navigation.md",
|
||
"question": "Where does independently developed Zulip scope navigation/search result and focus applicability, and where does our model fail to establish a guarantee?",
|
||
"previous_belief": "The authored navigation generation guard protected current-view and focus effects, but independent application recurrence and alternative ownership/cache policies were unverified.",
|
||
"conclusion": "Revise guidance toward per-effect applicability: pinned Zulip preserves noncurrent cache data while guarding main selected-view continuations by list identity. Make client-fragment addressability explicit without inferring no-script enhancement. Shared feedback, auxiliary callbacks and deferred focus limit the inference.",
|
||
"disposition": "revision",
|
||
"affected_patterns": [
|
||
"CAND-0009",
|
||
"CAND-0010",
|
||
"CAND-0016"
|
||
],
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
"research/reviews/ZulipNavigationSourceStudy.md",
|
||
"research/reviews/ZulipNavigationSources.json",
|
||
"research/evolution/cycles/2026-09-27-zulip-navigation-effort.json"
|
||
],
|
||
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
||
"Static targeted ranges in twelve files, no Zulip runtime/upstream test execution or independent human/AT review.",
|
||
"Auxiliary lookup/anchor continuations, deferred focus and callback wiring need a bounded follow-up before any race claim.",
|
||
"One Zulip family supplies partial mechanisms, not full-contract recurrence or a no-script guarantee."
|
||
],
|
||
"reviewer": {
|
||
"name": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false
|
||
},
|
||
"effort": {
|
||
"research_minutes": 6.345,
|
||
"execution_minutes": 0.289,
|
||
"reported_tokens": null,
|
||
"cost_usd": null
|
||
},
|
||
"supersedes": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "LEARN-0015",
|
||
"date": "2026-09-27",
|
||
"recording": "prospective",
|
||
"stream": "cross-stream",
|
||
"comparison_group": "CD-authority-projection-documentary-v1",
|
||
"protocol_ref": "research/evolution/cycles/2026-09-27-authority-projection.md",
|
||
"question": "Do the six authority/projection seeds denote reusable patterns or a mixture of scoped acceptance, projection placement and delivery choices?",
|
||
"previous_belief": "Authority is scoped and acknowledgement levels differ, but six seed names lack developed contracts and their projection/delivery relationships are not explicitly compared.",
|
||
"conclusion": "Revise the research decision aid to separate scoped acceptance, projection computation and delivery timing with compatibility constraints. Six seed dispositions and two synthetic traces; retain all seeds, zero new drafts or candidate maturity changes.",
|
||
"disposition": "revision",
|
||
"affected_patterns": [],
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
"research/reviews/AuthorityProjectionComparison.md",
|
||
"research/evolution/cycles/2026-09-27-authority-projection-effort.json"
|
||
],
|
||
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
||
"Six living primary documents across four families, not independent full-contract implementations; exact revisions unknown.",
|
||
"Synthetic VC-01/02 reasoning is not execution or demonstrated usefulness; authority/merge/storage and phase-specific recovery contracts still need application evidence.",
|
||
"Existing candidate profiles unchanged; five prospective groups are not a comparable learning trend."
|
||
],
|
||
"reviewer": {
|
||
"name": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false
|
||
},
|
||
"effort": {
|
||
"research_minutes": 3.128,
|
||
"execution_minutes": 0.033,
|
||
"reported_tokens": null,
|
||
"cost_usd": null
|
||
},
|
||
"supersedes": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "LEARN-0016",
|
||
"date": "2026-09-27",
|
||
"recording": "prospective",
|
||
"stream": "cross-stream",
|
||
"comparison_group": "CD-acceptance-projection-static-v1",
|
||
"protocol_ref": "research/evolution/cycles/2026-09-27-zulip-acceptance.md",
|
||
"question": "Does the six-question authority/projection aid distinguish local editable content, remote shared acceptance and subsequent projection in a pinned application?",
|
||
"previous_belief": "Scoped acceptance, projection location and delivery schedule are separate questions with compatibility constraints; a local display need not establish shared acceptance.",
|
||
"conclusion": "Corroborated in pinned Zulip content editing: conditional local Markdown echo precedes remote validation; locked optional content checks and server rendering precede save/event scheduling; HTTP and event application are distinct paths. Same displayed object can carry tentative content. No candidate or maturity change.",
|
||
"disposition": "corroboration",
|
||
"affected_patterns": [],
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
"research/reviews/ZulipAcceptanceProjection.md",
|
||
"research/reviews/ZulipAcceptanceSources.json",
|
||
"research/evolution/cycles/2026-09-27-zulip-acceptance-effort.json"
|
||
],
|
||
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
||
"Ten selected source/test files from one existing Zulip family, no application/database/upstream test execution or full-contract recurrence.",
|
||
"Response/event ordering, lost response after acceptance and current-edit ownership need preregistered reproduction; no defect or safe-replay claim.",
|
||
"Six prospective groups are not a comparable trend; original human and milestone gates remain open."
|
||
],
|
||
"reviewer": {
|
||
"name": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false
|
||
},
|
||
"effort": {
|
||
"research_minutes": 4.182,
|
||
"execution_minutes": 0.102,
|
||
"reported_tokens": null,
|
||
"cost_usd": null
|
||
},
|
||
"supersedes": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "LEARN-0017",
|
||
"date": "2026-09-27",
|
||
"recording": "prospective",
|
||
"stream": "B",
|
||
"comparison_group": "B-independent-navigation-source-v1",
|
||
"protocol_ref": "research/evolution/cycles/2026-09-27-zulip-target-lookup.md",
|
||
"question": "Do Zulip's target-message lookup and anchor-navigation fetch continuation guard against a stale navigation that occurred while the request was in flight, the way the main narrow-fetch continuation (ZN02) does?",
|
||
"previous_belief": "ZN07 located both callbacks and noted no visible captured-current-list guard, but did not trace their callers or check test coverage.",
|
||
"conclusion": "Traced both continuations to their concrete completion points: process_result calls opts.cont unconditionally, and neither the target-lookup channel.get nor load_messages_around_anchor supplies opts.msg_list, so neither participates in the opt-in list-identity guard that message_fetch.ts implements for other callers. No located test exercises a stale-navigation scenario for either path.",
|
||
"disposition": "corroboration",
|
||
"affected_patterns": [
|
||
"CAND-0009",
|
||
"CAND-0010"
|
||
],
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
"research/reviews/ZulipTargetLookupCallPath.md",
|
||
"research/reviews/ZulipTargetLookupSources.json",
|
||
"research/evolution/cycles/2026-09-27-zulip-target-lookup-effort.json"
|
||
],
|
||
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
||
"Static source trace only; no application, database or upstream test executed, and no race actually reproduced.",
|
||
"show() performs its own state reset on entry, so a stale re-entry's externally observable effect is unverified without execution.",
|
||
"Second cycle in comparison group B-independent-navigation-source-v1; still short of three comparable cycles, and the workplan's rule against manufacturing cycles to reach that count still applies."
|
||
],
|
||
"reviewer": {
|
||
"name": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false
|
||
},
|
||
"effort": {
|
||
"research_minutes": null,
|
||
"execution_minutes": null,
|
||
"reported_tokens": null,
|
||
"cost_usd": null
|
||
},
|
||
"supersedes": []
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "LEARN-0018",
|
||
"date": "2026-09-28",
|
||
"recording": "prospective",
|
||
"stream": "D",
|
||
"comparison_group": "D-sqlite-git-recovery-v1",
|
||
"protocol_ref": "research/evolution/cycles/2026-09-28-storage-receiver.md",
|
||
"question": "Which process-recovery obligations can SQLite plus actual Git receive-pack satisfy, and where does object identity fail to supply an operation receipt?",
|
||
"previous_belief": "Atomic local intent/outbox updates and stable receiver identity support recovery within explicit transaction, ancestry and retention boundaries.",
|
||
"conclusion": "Nine checks corroborate atomic SQLite process recovery, Git replay and server ancestry refusal; split-transaction and fresh-identity negative controls retain the limits. One authored integration, not a full frontend use.",
|
||
"disposition": "corroboration",
|
||
"affected_patterns": [
|
||
"CAND-0002",
|
||
"CAND-0003",
|
||
"CAND-0006",
|
||
"CAND-0007"
|
||
],
|
||
"evidence": [
|
||
"research/reviews/StorageReceiverRecovery.md",
|
||
"research/experiments/storage-receiver/result.json",
|
||
"research/evolution/cycles/2026-09-28-storage-receiver-effort.json"
|
||
],
|
||
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
||
"Power-loss, device-loss backup, remote durability and arbitrary operation-ID retention remain unverified.",
|
||
"No full frontend contract, independent human validation or M1/M2/M3 acceptance.",
|
||
"New runtime group is not comparable with static studies; no learning trend."
|
||
],
|
||
"reviewer": {
|
||
"name": "Codex",
|
||
"role": "author-model",
|
||
"independent_human": false
|
||
},
|
||
"effort": {
|
||
"research_minutes": 4.123,
|
||
"execution_minutes": 0.014,
|
||
"reported_tokens": null,
|
||
"cost_usd": null
|
||
},
|
||
"supersedes": []
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
},
|
||
"context": {
|
||
"schema_version": 1,
|
||
"cases": [
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "VC-01",
|
||
"state": "synthetic draft",
|
||
"ref": "research/walkthroughs/VC01-TransactionalAdministration.md"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "VC-02",
|
||
"state": "synthetic draft",
|
||
"ref": "research/walkthroughs/VC02-OfflineFieldNotes.md"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "VC-03",
|
||
"state": "provisional",
|
||
"ref": "research/walkthroughs/VC03-ContentPublication.md"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "VC-04",
|
||
"state": "planned",
|
||
"ref": "research/plan/ValidationCases.md"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "VC-05",
|
||
"state": "planned",
|
||
"ref": "research/plan/ValidationCases.md"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "VC-06",
|
||
"state": "provisional",
|
||
"ref": "research/walkthroughs/VC06-MicrofrontendEstate.md"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "VC-07",
|
||
"state": "planned",
|
||
"ref": "research/plan/ValidationCases.md"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "VC-08",
|
||
"state": "planned",
|
||
"ref": "research/plan/ValidationCases.md"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "VC-09",
|
||
"state": "planned",
|
||
"ref": "research/plan/ValidationCases.md"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "VC-10",
|
||
"state": "planned",
|
||
"ref": "research/plan/ValidationCases.md"
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"usefulness": {
|
||
"named_score": 18,
|
||
"prose_score": 18,
|
||
"denominator": 24,
|
||
"independent_human": false,
|
||
"decision_time_minutes": null,
|
||
"ref": "research/evaluations/language-pilot-01/submitted-review-01/adjudication.md",
|
||
"limit": "One frozen development pilot with submitted model review; six matched briefs. Equal aggregate scores do not establish equivalence. Stable anchors are consumed development cases, not fresh held-out tasks.",
|
||
"initial_unsupported_claims_each": 2,
|
||
"adjudicated_unsupported_claim_count": null
|
||
},
|
||
"open_work": [
|
||
"workplans/FEP-WP-0002-seed-language-validation.md",
|
||
"workplans/FEP-WP-0003-contrasting-schools.md",
|
||
"workplans/FEP-WP-0006-language-evolution.md"
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|