tegwick
e8ccb73a12
Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a0cffe-206f-7323-89d3-b20ca4cf4bf9
455 lines
16 KiB
JSON
455 lines
16 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"schema_version": 1,
|
|
"coverage": "Ten selected retrospective outcomes (not a historical census), followed by prospectively registered bounded cycles. Retrospective effort remains unknown.",
|
|
"events": [
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "LEARN-0001",
|
|
"date": "2026-09-25",
|
|
"recording": "retrospective",
|
|
"stream": "D",
|
|
"comparison_group": null,
|
|
"question": "What do pinned recovery implementations establish?",
|
|
"previous_belief": "Documentary motivation did not locate draft/outcome mechanisms in frontend code.",
|
|
"conclusion": "Zulip and Element locate partial draft/outcome mechanisms; complete pattern recurrence is still unknown.",
|
|
"disposition": "revision",
|
|
"affected_patterns": [
|
|
"CAND-0005",
|
|
"CAND-0007"
|
|
],
|
|
"evidence": [
|
|
"research/reviews/FrontendRecoveryImplementations.md"
|
|
],
|
|
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
|
"Deployed full lifecycle remains unverified."
|
|
],
|
|
"reviewer": {
|
|
"name": "Codex",
|
|
"role": "author-model",
|
|
"independent_human": false
|
|
},
|
|
"effort": {
|
|
"research_minutes": null,
|
|
"execution_minutes": null,
|
|
"reported_tokens": null,
|
|
"cost_usd": null
|
|
},
|
|
"supersedes": []
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "LEARN-0002",
|
|
"date": "2026-09-25",
|
|
"recording": "retrospective",
|
|
"stream": "D",
|
|
"comparison_group": null,
|
|
"question": "Does cancellation or a transport error settle mutation outcome?",
|
|
"previous_belief": "Recovery identity and authoritative echo required executable checks.",
|
|
"conclusion": "Synthetic transport with the real Matrix SDK distinguishes replay identity, duplicate commits and authoritative echo.",
|
|
"disposition": "revision",
|
|
"affected_patterns": [
|
|
"CAND-0007"
|
|
],
|
|
"evidence": [
|
|
"research/reviews/MatrixRecoveryExperiment.md"
|
|
],
|
|
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
|
"No real server deduplication guarantee."
|
|
],
|
|
"reviewer": {
|
|
"name": "Codex",
|
|
"role": "author-model",
|
|
"independent_human": false
|
|
},
|
|
"effort": {
|
|
"research_minutes": null,
|
|
"execution_minutes": null,
|
|
"reported_tokens": null,
|
|
"cost_usd": null
|
|
},
|
|
"supersedes": []
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "LEARN-0003",
|
|
"date": "2026-09-26",
|
|
"recording": "retrospective",
|
|
"stream": "cross-stream",
|
|
"comparison_group": null,
|
|
"question": "Does naming patterns improve the frozen pilot decisions?",
|
|
"previous_belief": "Initial editorial scores were 21/24 named and 19/24 prose.",
|
|
"conclusion": "Submitted model review adjudication yields 18/24 in each condition; this does not establish equivalence or a presentation benefit.",
|
|
"disposition": "revision",
|
|
"affected_patterns": [
|
|
"CAND-0005",
|
|
"CAND-0007",
|
|
"CAND-0001",
|
|
"CAND-0002"
|
|
],
|
|
"evidence": [
|
|
"research/evaluations/language-pilot-01/submitted-review-01/adjudication.md"
|
|
],
|
|
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
|
"Independent human validation pending.",
|
|
"Historical effort unknown; this entry does not allocate whole-pilot telemetry."
|
|
],
|
|
"reviewer": {
|
|
"name": "Codex",
|
|
"role": "author-model",
|
|
"independent_human": false
|
|
},
|
|
"effort": {
|
|
"research_minutes": null,
|
|
"execution_minutes": null,
|
|
"reported_tokens": null,
|
|
"cost_usd": null
|
|
},
|
|
"supersedes": []
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "LEARN-0004",
|
|
"date": "2026-09-26",
|
|
"recording": "retrospective",
|
|
"stream": "D",
|
|
"comparison_group": null,
|
|
"question": "Which recovery recommendations overstate their guarantees?",
|
|
"previous_belief": "Shared guidance left retention/export policy, cancellation and local backup boundaries insufficiently explicit.",
|
|
"conclusion": "Guidance now separates authorization, remote compensation, atomic supersession and off-device backup.",
|
|
"disposition": "revision",
|
|
"affected_patterns": [
|
|
"CAND-0001",
|
|
"CAND-0002",
|
|
"CAND-0003",
|
|
"CAND-0005",
|
|
"CAND-0007"
|
|
],
|
|
"evidence": [
|
|
"research/reviews/SharedGuidanceRevision.md"
|
|
],
|
|
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
|
"Editorial correction is not new production evidence."
|
|
],
|
|
"reviewer": {
|
|
"name": "Codex",
|
|
"role": "author-model",
|
|
"independent_human": false
|
|
},
|
|
"effort": {
|
|
"research_minutes": null,
|
|
"execution_minutes": null,
|
|
"reported_tokens": null,
|
|
"cost_usd": null
|
|
},
|
|
"supersedes": []
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "LEARN-0005",
|
|
"date": "2026-09-26",
|
|
"recording": "retrospective",
|
|
"stream": "B",
|
|
"comparison_group": null,
|
|
"question": "What does URL/history and enhancement documentation actually promise?",
|
|
"previous_belief": "Navigation and rendering seeds lacked explicit dereferenceability and fallback distinctions.",
|
|
"conclusion": "Developed two hypotheses separating address-bar updates from direct loads, and HTML delivery from usable no-script actions.",
|
|
"disposition": "revision",
|
|
"affected_patterns": [
|
|
"CAND-0009",
|
|
"CAND-0010"
|
|
],
|
|
"evidence": [
|
|
"research/reviews/NavigationRenderingEvidence.md"
|
|
],
|
|
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
|
"Navigation/history/cache runtime checks remain pending."
|
|
],
|
|
"reviewer": {
|
|
"name": "Codex",
|
|
"role": "author-model",
|
|
"independent_human": false
|
|
},
|
|
"effort": {
|
|
"research_minutes": null,
|
|
"execution_minutes": null,
|
|
"reported_tokens": null,
|
|
"cost_usd": null
|
|
},
|
|
"supersedes": []
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "LEARN-0006",
|
|
"date": "2026-09-26",
|
|
"recording": "retrospective",
|
|
"stream": "F",
|
|
"comparison_group": null,
|
|
"question": "Why can immediate nested dismissal close the outer task?",
|
|
"previous_belief": "The first fixture exposed a timing failure with unresolved ownership.",
|
|
"conclusion": "Trace locates stale Escape listener ownership despite inner registration/focus; a guard can lose input.",
|
|
"disposition": "revision",
|
|
"affected_patterns": [
|
|
"CAND-0016",
|
|
"CAND-0015"
|
|
],
|
|
"evidence": [
|
|
"research/reviews/BoundaryRecoveryExperiment.md",
|
|
"research/reviews/NestedDismissalIsolation.md"
|
|
],
|
|
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
|
"Readiness waits are not a public product repair."
|
|
],
|
|
"reviewer": {
|
|
"name": "Codex",
|
|
"role": "author-model",
|
|
"independent_human": false
|
|
},
|
|
"effort": {
|
|
"research_minutes": null,
|
|
"execution_minutes": null,
|
|
"reported_tokens": null,
|
|
"cost_usd": null
|
|
},
|
|
"supersedes": []
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "LEARN-0007",
|
|
"date": "2026-09-26",
|
|
"recording": "retrospective",
|
|
"stream": "F",
|
|
"comparison_group": null,
|
|
"question": "Can event-time ownership route dismissal without a settling delay?",
|
|
"previous_belief": "Isolation supplied a mechanism but no lifecycle-safe candidate routing experiment.",
|
|
"conclusion": "Controlled fixture routed 24/24 versus raw 20/24; initial measurement error and corrected results retained.",
|
|
"disposition": "revision",
|
|
"affected_patterns": [
|
|
"CAND-0016"
|
|
],
|
|
"evidence": [
|
|
"research/reviews/NestedOwnershipRouting.md"
|
|
],
|
|
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
|
"Animated exit and competing-owner coverage remain open."
|
|
],
|
|
"reviewer": {
|
|
"name": "Codex",
|
|
"role": "author-model",
|
|
"independent_human": false
|
|
},
|
|
"effort": {
|
|
"research_minutes": null,
|
|
"execution_minutes": null,
|
|
"reported_tokens": null,
|
|
"cost_usd": null
|
|
},
|
|
"supersedes": []
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "LEARN-0008",
|
|
"date": "2026-09-26",
|
|
"recording": "retrospective",
|
|
"stream": "E",
|
|
"comparison_group": null,
|
|
"question": "Are feature organization and independent activation the same boundary?",
|
|
"previous_belief": "The feature-slice hypothesis needed a source-layout/release contrast.",
|
|
"conclusion": "Pinned examples distinguish organizational slicing from activation contracts; added Independent Feature Boundary.",
|
|
"disposition": "revision",
|
|
"affected_patterns": [
|
|
"CAND-0013",
|
|
"CAND-0017"
|
|
],
|
|
"evidence": [
|
|
"research/reviews/FeatureDeploymentBoundaries.md"
|
|
],
|
|
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
|
"Shared startup dependencies still couple nominally separate features."
|
|
],
|
|
"reviewer": {
|
|
"name": "Codex",
|
|
"role": "author-model",
|
|
"independent_human": false
|
|
},
|
|
"effort": {
|
|
"research_minutes": null,
|
|
"execution_minutes": null,
|
|
"reported_tokens": null,
|
|
"cost_usd": null
|
|
},
|
|
"supersedes": []
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "LEARN-0009",
|
|
"date": "2026-09-26",
|
|
"recording": "retrospective",
|
|
"stream": "E",
|
|
"comparison_group": null,
|
|
"question": "Does publication or rollback update every session?",
|
|
"previous_belief": "Static source review could not establish loaded/lazy-session behavior.",
|
|
"conclusion": "Native-module experiment distinguishes publication, activation and already-bound sessions; artifact retirement breaks old lazy sessions.",
|
|
"disposition": "revision",
|
|
"affected_patterns": [
|
|
"CAND-0017"
|
|
],
|
|
"evidence": [
|
|
"research/reviews/FeatureReleaseExperiment.md"
|
|
],
|
|
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
|
"No CDN or upstream deployment validation."
|
|
],
|
|
"reviewer": {
|
|
"name": "Codex",
|
|
"role": "author-model",
|
|
"independent_human": false
|
|
},
|
|
"effort": {
|
|
"research_minutes": null,
|
|
"execution_minutes": null,
|
|
"reported_tokens": null,
|
|
"cost_usd": null
|
|
},
|
|
"supersedes": []
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "LEARN-0010",
|
|
"date": "2026-09-26",
|
|
"recording": "retrospective",
|
|
"stream": "E",
|
|
"comparison_group": null,
|
|
"question": "How do stale activation writers and unfinished drafts constrain updates?",
|
|
"previous_belief": "Release experiment left activation conflicts and reload policy unexecuted.",
|
|
"conclusion": "Conditional replacement rejects stale writers; explicit reload policies preserve or refuse transition, with schema recheck after navigation.",
|
|
"disposition": "revision",
|
|
"affected_patterns": [
|
|
"CAND-0017",
|
|
"CAND-0005",
|
|
"CAND-0006"
|
|
],
|
|
"evidence": [
|
|
"research/reviews/ActivationConflictsAndReload.md"
|
|
],
|
|
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
|
"One-process atomicity; no native unload, crash or real remote-outcome coverage."
|
|
],
|
|
"reviewer": {
|
|
"name": "Codex",
|
|
"role": "author-model",
|
|
"independent_human": false
|
|
},
|
|
"effort": {
|
|
"research_minutes": null,
|
|
"execution_minutes": null,
|
|
"reported_tokens": null,
|
|
"cost_usd": null
|
|
},
|
|
"supersedes": []
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "LEARN-0011",
|
|
"date": "2026-09-27",
|
|
"recording": "prospective",
|
|
"stream": "B",
|
|
"comparison_group": "B-navigation-mechanism-v1",
|
|
"protocol_ref": "research/evolution/cycles/2026-09-27-navigation.md",
|
|
"question": "Can a public route preserve selection and complete-document availability across native/enhanced entry, history and HTTP caching?",
|
|
"previous_belief": "Native href/GET contracts plus representation-aware routing and cache selection should satisfy this narrow obligation; documentary support lacked runtime checks.",
|
|
"conclusion": "Corroborated in pinned htmx fixture: native and history paths work; missing Vary reproduces fragment-as-document reuse in both browsers. Existing obligations stand; no new pattern or promotion.",
|
|
"disposition": "corroboration",
|
|
"affected_patterns": [
|
|
"CAND-0009",
|
|
"CAND-0010"
|
|
],
|
|
"evidence": [
|
|
"research/reviews/NavigationHistoryExperiment.md",
|
|
"research/experiments/navigation-history/result.json",
|
|
"research/evolution/cycles/2026-09-27-navigation-effort.json"
|
|
],
|
|
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
|
"One authored application, no independent recurrence or usefulness gain.",
|
|
"Accessibility, delayed scripts, interrupted transport, real intermediaries and offline availability remain open."
|
|
],
|
|
"reviewer": {
|
|
"name": "Codex",
|
|
"role": "author-model",
|
|
"independent_human": false
|
|
},
|
|
"effort": {
|
|
"research_minutes": 6.177,
|
|
"execution_minutes": 1.021,
|
|
"reported_tokens": null,
|
|
"cost_usd": null
|
|
},
|
|
"supersedes": []
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "LEARN-0012",
|
|
"date": "2026-09-27",
|
|
"recording": "prospective",
|
|
"stream": "F",
|
|
"comparison_group": "F-navigation-focus-v1",
|
|
"protocol_ref": "research/evolution/cycles/2026-09-27-navigation-focus.md",
|
|
"question": "Does enhanced route replacement need explicit continuation and feedback policy that respects changed focus ownership?",
|
|
"previous_belief": "Native controls alone do not establish enhanced focus/feedback semantics; delayed responses should respect focus moved to another surviving task. Modal return is not automatically route continuation.",
|
|
"conclusion": "Corroborated in 22 cases: raw same-ID link focus survives but this fragment contract leaves stale title and silent failure; authored heading/status policy works and preserves newer search focus. No AT speech or universal heading policy established.",
|
|
"disposition": "corroboration",
|
|
"affected_patterns": [
|
|
"CAND-0010",
|
|
"CAND-0016"
|
|
],
|
|
"evidence": [
|
|
"research/reviews/NavigationFocusExperiment.md",
|
|
"research/experiments/navigation-history/focus-result.json",
|
|
"research/evolution/cycles/2026-09-27-navigation-focus-effort.json"
|
|
],
|
|
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
|
"Author-model DOM evidence, no human/AT validation or independent recurrence.",
|
|
"Delayed history focus, competing requests, delayed scripts and interrupted enhancement remain open."
|
|
],
|
|
"reviewer": {
|
|
"name": "Codex",
|
|
"role": "author-model",
|
|
"independent_human": false
|
|
},
|
|
"effort": {
|
|
"research_minutes": 5.138,
|
|
"execution_minutes": 0.525,
|
|
"reported_tokens": null,
|
|
"cost_usd": null
|
|
},
|
|
"supersedes": []
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "LEARN-0013",
|
|
"date": "2026-09-27",
|
|
"recording": "prospective",
|
|
"stream": "F",
|
|
"comparison_group": "F-navigation-ownership-v1",
|
|
"protocol_ref": "research/evolution/cycles/2026-09-27-navigation-ownership.md",
|
|
"question": "Can obsolete history/navigation completions affect newer intent, and does separating completion ownership from focus ownership prevent it?",
|
|
"previous_belief": "The single-response continuation policy preserved newer search focus but left competing history/success/error completions unresolved; focus-at-swap alone might not be sufficient.",
|
|
"conclusion": "Revise operational guidance: validate navigation ownership before content/URL/title/feedback effects, including stale errors and newer failure, independently of focus permission. Prior policy misses obligations in 12/12 adversarial rows; authored guard meets 12/12. Pause fixture work for independent source contrast.",
|
|
"disposition": "revision",
|
|
"affected_patterns": [
|
|
"CAND-0009",
|
|
"CAND-0010",
|
|
"CAND-0016"
|
|
],
|
|
"evidence": [
|
|
"research/reviews/NavigationOwnershipExperiment.md",
|
|
"research/reviews/NavigationThreadReview.md",
|
|
"research/experiments/navigation-history/ownership-result.json",
|
|
"research/evolution/cycles/2026-09-27-navigation-ownership-effort.json"
|
|
],
|
|
"remaining_uncertainty": [
|
|
"One authored htmx family and author-model review, not production recurrence or AT validation.",
|
|
"History adapter is pinned implementation-dependent; pending-state, multiple-miss and lifecycle limits remain open.",
|
|
"Three distinct protocols are not a comparable diminishing-returns window."
|
|
],
|
|
"reviewer": {
|
|
"name": "Codex",
|
|
"role": "author-model",
|
|
"independent_human": false
|
|
},
|
|
"effort": {
|
|
"research_minutes": 13.918,
|
|
"execution_minutes": 1.238,
|
|
"reported_tokens": null,
|
|
"cost_usd": null
|
|
},
|
|
"supersedes": []
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|