158 lines
4.4 KiB
Markdown
158 lines
4.4 KiB
Markdown
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
id: GH-WP-0004
|
|||
|
|
type: workplan
|
|||
|
|
title: "§11 layer declarations — amendment set and estate closure"
|
|||
|
|
domain: infotech
|
|||
|
|
repo: gate-house
|
|||
|
|
status: active
|
|||
|
|
flavor: implementation
|
|||
|
|
origin: GH-IN-0003
|
|||
|
|
owner: codex
|
|||
|
|
topic_slug: infotech
|
|||
|
|
created: "2026-09-21"
|
|||
|
|
updated: "2026-09-21"
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
# §11 layer declarations — amendment set and estate closure
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Goal
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Land the five §11/§4/§3 amendments that `GH-DEC-2026-017` and `GH-DEC-2026-018`
|
|||
|
|
produce, into the **proposed** v0.8 cut before the acceptance flip, and close the
|
|||
|
|
estate-side items the two rulings create. `GH-DEC-2026-019` holds the flip on this
|
|||
|
|
workplan and states three closing conditions.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**Normative text for A9–A13 is drafted at
|
|||
|
|
`docs/amendments/v0.8-section-11-declaration-amendments.md`.** That file is the
|
|||
|
|
reviewable unit: each amendment carries its own wording, defect statement, and
|
|||
|
|
authority, so it can be argued before anything touches the cut.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Why now
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
`access-engine`'s boundaries review (`FLEX-WP-0030`) found five §11 defects from
|
|||
|
|
outside, after the v0.8 round closed, in the section `audit-core` was asked to attack
|
|||
|
|
and did not return a review on. One of them — A10's — is `gate-house`'s own amendment
|
|||
|
|
`A2`, written twelve days ago and reviewed twice without anyone noticing it named a §4
|
|||
|
|
property §4 does not carry.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
v0.7 stays `accepted` and in force, unpatched. Nothing operational waits on this; the
|
|||
|
|
cost of the hold is documentation currency, which is what makes it affordable
|
|||
|
|
(`GH-DEC-2026-019` §3).
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Tasks
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### T01 — A9: state the §3 vocabulary once, as tokens
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Four tokens, closed, case-insensitive comparison, `Engine` not `Engines`, role is not
|
|||
|
|
layer. Resolves the §3-versus-§4 divergence that makes two faithful runs disagree about
|
|||
|
|
eight rows.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```task
|
|||
|
|
id: GH-WP-0004-T01
|
|||
|
|
status: todo
|
|||
|
|
priority: high
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### T02 — A10: §4 gains an evidence-source marking; §11's check reads the marking
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Includes the per-event-class clause and the count repair. Then assess the remaining §4
|
|||
|
|
rows repository by repository — `access-engine` is marked by `GH-DEC-2026-018` §2; the
|
|||
|
|
others are asked, not assigned.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```task
|
|||
|
|
id: GH-WP-0004-T02
|
|||
|
|
status: todo
|
|||
|
|
priority: high
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### T03 — A11: `INTENT.md` governs, the sidecar is derived, a run states its scope
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```task
|
|||
|
|
id: GH-WP-0004-T03
|
|||
|
|
status: todo
|
|||
|
|
priority: high
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### T04 — A12: a declaration carries no standard version
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Includes asking `ops-warden` to drop `standard_version` from the reference form rather
|
|||
|
|
than each of the seven adopters deciding separately.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```task
|
|||
|
|
id: GH-WP-0004-T04
|
|||
|
|
status: todo
|
|||
|
|
priority: medium
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### T05 — A13: the `access-engine` coordinate is pending, not broken
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
One line in §4. No gate-house ruling required; substance already ruled in the owning
|
|||
|
|
repository under `FLEX-WP-0020`.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```task
|
|||
|
|
id: GH-WP-0004-T05
|
|||
|
|
status: todo
|
|||
|
|
priority: low
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### T06 — Ask `informed-decision` whether it should become a §4 catalog row
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Asked, not enrolled. Its correction from `surface` to `Staff`/`pep-shaped` is its own and
|
|||
|
|
is not a condition of this task.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```task
|
|||
|
|
id: GH-WP-0004-T06
|
|||
|
|
status: todo
|
|||
|
|
priority: medium
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### T07 — Closing condition 2: `audit-core` returns its §11 review or declines in writing
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
A written decline closes it. §14 records *not claimed* rather than counting silence as
|
|||
|
|
assent, and the point is that the record says which.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```task
|
|||
|
|
id: GH-WP-0004-T07
|
|||
|
|
status: wait
|
|||
|
|
priority: high
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### T08 — Closing condition 3: `key-cape`, `ops-mason`, `net-kingdom` declare or record a dated gap
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
`gate-house`'s own is discharged (`GH-DEC-2026-017` §6, this commit). A declaration or a
|
|||
|
|
dated gap satisfies this equally; conformance is not the condition.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```task
|
|||
|
|
id: GH-WP-0004-T08
|
|||
|
|
status: wait
|
|||
|
|
priority: high
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### T09 — Circulate A9–A13 for assent and disposition the returns
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Round list: `net-kingdom` (publisher), `access-engine`, `audit-core`, `approval-engine`,
|
|||
|
|
`ops-warden`, `kings-guard`, plus `informed-decision` and `railiance-master` as the two
|
|||
|
|
repositories the vocabulary ruling touches from outside §4.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```task
|
|||
|
|
id: GH-WP-0004-T09
|
|||
|
|
status: progress
|
|||
|
|
priority: high
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### T10 — `net-kingdom` assembles the amendments into the v0.8 cut and flips acceptance
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Publication and the flip are `net-kingdom`'s and were handed over at v0.8 round close.
|
|||
|
|
This task tracks the handoff, not the execution.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```task
|
|||
|
|
id: GH-WP-0004-T10
|
|||
|
|
status: wait
|
|||
|
|
priority: medium
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Done when
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
All five amendments are in the v0.8 cut, the three `GH-DEC-2026-019` closing conditions
|
|||
|
|
are met, and `net-kingdom` has flipped v0.8 to `accepted`.
|