Record assent requests raised for GH-WP-0001-T03

Assent was ratified as needed but never actually requested. Raised as intakes
in the owning repositories — FLEX-IN-0001, KG-IN-0001, WARDEN-IN-0001 — with
State Hub inbox notification.

Intakes rather than tasks: GH-DEC-2026-001 does not authorize changing another
repository's workplans, and ADR-007 places work structure with the repository
doing the work. An intake is the inbound channel; each repository triages and
promotes it into its own structure.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 2564823@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 2a7ed827-4928-4b9f-8613-9135c9cadfe9
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-08-28 21:31:13 +02:00
parent 4f618b44de
commit 046b06fb18

View file

@ -48,11 +48,22 @@ priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "12f651be-1c07-587b-a781-4472e189e218"
```
Obtain assent for the two boundaries that move vocabulary away from repositories
currently using it: flex-auth (Engine framing, rename, authoring/evaluation
split — INTENT reframed, rename outstanding) and kings-guard plus ops-warden
("control plane" and the security curriculum). Promote the standard from
`proposed` to `accepted` once assent lands.
Obtain assent for the boundaries that move vocabulary away from repositories
currently using it. Requested 2026-08-28 as intakes in the owning repositories,
with State Hub inbox notification — the intake is the inbound channel, so each
repository triages and promotes into its own work structure rather than having
work created for it:
- `FLEX-IN-0001` — Engine framing, the access-engine rename, and the
authoring/evaluation split. INTENT reframe applied; rename not authorized.
- `KG-IN-0001` — Staff placement, "control plane" as Engine vocabulary, and the
posture asymmetry.
- `WARDEN-IN-0001` — Staff placement, doctrine versus runbook, the access
lane/rule demarcation, and adding gate-house to the routing tables.
Awaiting response. Assent, revision, or rejection are all acceptable outcomes;
a rejection that names a practical failure is the more valuable answer. Promote
the standard from `proposed` to `accepted` once the three have answered.
```task
id: GH-WP-0001-T04