diff --git a/decisions/decisions.md b/decisions/decisions.md index c709b19..3ad25bd 100644 --- a/decisions/decisions.md +++ b/decisions/decisions.md @@ -4348,3 +4348,69 @@ through `AUDIT-IN-0006`. `audit-core` referred the statute question here instead of deciding it in the registration, and said plainly that preferring withholding was not its to say. The 2026-10-03 reply stated the reading and left the conflict open. This record closes it by refusal. + + +## GH-DEC-2026-025 — Carry the deterministic presentation evidence tension explicitly and hand off the requested catalogue row + +```yaml +id: GH-DEC-2026-025 +kind: decision +title: Carry the deterministic presentation evidence tension explicitly and hand off the requested catalogue row +status: resolved +owner: Bernd Worsch +repo: gate-house +created: '2026-10-11' +updated: '2026-10-11' +decided_by: Bernd Worsch +source_note: GH-WP-0004-T06-r1; native human memo infd-20261011-staff-evidence-tension version 1 +native_review_id: review-2e615985-54c9-40d8-8547-b8fdcb10b1d6 +native_approval_id: d90c899b-f25c-4e66-a003-808ee5b1324f +native_disposition_id: disp-24e94200-ed93-4a18-900c-3128d26ba212 +proposal_sha256: 08bc78a29c2b67cec0aafba993fb2d25312b629ecccb81458980baafe38e566a +submission_digest: sha256:d2224fb5f8e577b1dd45b73fb01bf6c8880f1e7e167945e3a186b23738742609 +affects: [gate-house, informed-decision, net-kingdom, audit-core, policy-nexus] +rationale: >- + Confirmed native human ACCEPT of the exact bounded carried-tension proposal + for source-owner review and successor publication. Retain the ruled Staff / + PEP-shaped classification; propose the requested catalogue row with evidence + source yes, and keep the actual section 3.4 tension and owed per-event + load-bearing guarantees visible. This does not ratify a whole successor + standard, edit accepted v0.8, authorize deployment or certify runtime evidence. +``` + +### Confirmed disposition and exact scope + +The native outcome records a confirmed person `accept` at 2026-10-11T01:46:25Z, +actor `uid=platform-root,ou=people,dc=netkingdom,dc=local`, against memo version 1, +review `review-2e615985-54c9-40d8-8547-b8fdcb10b1d6`; the review is not stale. +The approval and disposition above identify the actual human act. The +[retained evidence receipt](../docs/evidence/2026-10-11-staff-evidence-human-disposition.json) +preserves the exact submitted packet and native outcome. Gate House records this +human disposition; it performs neither the human act nor a new NetKingdom review. + +The approved instrument is the immutable +[GH-WP-0004-T06-r1 proposal](../docs/amendments/informed-decision-staff-evidence-disposition-proposal.md) +at its recorded digest, including its exact candidate §3.4 and §4 wording, +alternatives and recording limits. It approves **carrying** the incompatibility, +not claiming it solved: deterministic presentation evidence still does not fit the +absolute Staff wording. Catalogue membership identifies obligations; it is not +conformance. GH-DEC-2026-012/014/017/021/024 remain intact as prior decisions. + +### Source-owner handoff and retained obligations + +The [source-owner handoff](../docs/amendments/2026-10-11-staff-evidence-disposition-handoff.md) +extracts the approved wording for NetKingdom's proposed successor revision. +The prior distinct NetKingdom technical review in the native packet is not whole +revision ratification or serving publication. Accepted v0.8 SHA256 +`3d8298560069ef471fba28d2b1245fb2309328f231dad1a667cdf0ce5a5a7c8b` +remains immutable. The permitted next work is source-owner follow-through and +proposed successor publication; later acceptance and delivery retain their own gates. + +`INFD-IN-0007` remains open until the standard's accepted voice actually carries the +answer, as the approved packet says. The Staff/evidence fit remains a visible +unresolved finding even after that answer. `presentation` stays load-bearing/volume; +`disposition` and `stance-application` stay load-bearing/rare. Independent evidence, +per-class detection/reconciliation and existing fail-closed local evidence duties +are not waived. Source-owner implementation records, not this doctrine decision, +prove actual emission operation. Nothing here permits approval-current-state caches, +a second PDP, direct Tooling access, a blanket Staff state exemption or a new layer. diff --git a/docs/amendments/2026-10-11-staff-evidence-disposition-handoff.md b/docs/amendments/2026-10-11-staff-evidence-disposition-handoff.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9f61640 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/amendments/2026-10-11-staff-evidence-disposition-handoff.md @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@ +# GH-DEC-2026-025 — source-owner follow-through handoff + +Status: accepted bounded doctrine disposition; **publisher follow-through pending**. +Origin: existing `GH-WP-0004-T06`; no new workplan or foreign implementation tasks. + +Founder accepted GH-WP-0004-T06-r1 exactly at proposal SHA256 +`08bc78a29c2b67cec0aafba993fb2d25312b629ecccb81458980baafe38e566a` +and submitted-envelope digest +`d2224fb5f8e577b1dd45b73fb01bf6c8880f1e7e167945e3a186b23738742609`. +See GH-DEC-2026-025 and the retained native human disposition receipt. No broader +standard revision was ratified. NetKingdom retains its source-owner role; this +handoff does not write a NetKingdom review or pretend it accepted the whole cut. + +## Exact approved candidate text for a proposed successor source + + +Apply only in a proposed successor revision after founder disposition and publisher +review. Do not overwrite accepted v0.8. Sections not identified here are unchanged. + +### A. §3.4: insert after “Acting at runtime does not make a repository an Engine. Being agentic makes it Staff, and §5 governs how it acts.” + +> **Carried tension — deterministic presentation evidence.** `informed-decision` +> retains its ruled `Staff` / `PEP-shaped` classification (`GH-DEC-2026-012` R1, +> `GH-DEC-2026-017` §3). Its deterministic presentation and retention of evidence +> for `audit-core` do not fit this section's non-determinism description and +> prohibition on runtime-dependent state. This standard records that tension +> explicitly; it does not reinterpret those requirements as already satisfied. +> Its §4 row admits it to the conformance scope, not to a claim of conformance. +> +> A conformance report concerning this repository MUST state the §3.4 tension +> as unresolved and MUST NOT report the repository as wholly conforming solely +> because its layer declaration agrees or its pin detector passes. This is a +> repository-specific disposition, not a fifth layer or an exemption allowing +> other Staff repositories to hold Engine decision state. +> +> The existing boundaries remain binding: `informed-decision` MUST NOT render +> or cache an authorization verdict, hold approval current-state, decide +> approval validity or consume approvals. Its presentation claim MUST NOT be +> an input to the authorization decision it presents for; `view_hash` MUST NOT +> replace the approval-engine binding digest. The evidence copy MUST have the +> independent path required by `GH-DEC-2026-012` R2 limit 3. Emission guarantees +> remain owed under §9.6 and §11, per declared event class. This carried tension +> grants no permission to omit or downgrade load-bearing evidence, bypass an +> Engine, or continue an operation where a mandatory local evidence record +> cannot be made. The §3.4 tension remains visible until a later argued model +> revision resolves it; recording the tension is the answer to `INFD-IN-0007`, +> not a claim that the tension has disappeared. + +### B. §4: add after the approval-engine row + +| Repository | Layer | Role | Owns | Evidence source | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| `informed-decision` | Staff | PEP-shaped | human presentation and binding surface; presentation evidence emission; §3.4 carried tension; approval state remains approval-engine's | yes | + +### C. §4: replace the evidence-source values paragraph + +> The column carries exactly `yes`, `no`, or `unassessed`: `access-engine` and +> `informed-decision` are `yes`, `audit-core` is `no`, and all other rows remain +> `unassessed` until assessed. `—` is not a value. The §11 check reports +> `unassessed` as unassessed, never as conforming or as not a source +> (`GH-DEC-2026-024` §2). Catalog membership and an evidence-source marking +> identify the obligations to check; neither certifies that they are met. + +### D. §4: insert after that paragraph + +> `informed-decision` publishes three load-bearing event classes: +> `presentation` (volume), `disposition` (rare), and `stance-application` (rare). +> The volume class permits rate monitoring with positive window and minimum, +> together with reconciliation; the rare classes require heartbeat and +> reconciliation, not rate monitoring alone. Its source declaration currently +> records the emission guarantee as owed and not yet declarable. Until an +> actual guarantee and its verification are returned by the source, a §11 run +> MUST report it as owed/not declared, not as conforming or complete. Completing +> those guarantees does not by itself resolve the separate §3.4 tension. + + +## Owner destinations and completion boundary + +NetKingdom: receive this handoff in an existing source-owner work record, assemble +the exact bounded candidate in a proposed successor revision, retain accepted v0.8 +unchanged, and separately obtain acceptance for that revision as required. No live +message is sent by this worker; the parent coordinator applies and routes the record. +PolicyNexus: subsequent accepted-revision delivery belongs to its existing owner +publication route, not to Gate House runtime execution. + +InformedDecision: existing `INFD-IN-0007` is the live doctrine-response record. +Finished `INFD-WP-0007` (Workspace, publication and independent evidence) +and `INFD-WP-0005` (existing ledger/outbox, scheduled delivery and audit commitments) +retain historical implementation/evidence receipts, not live unfinished tasks. +The coordinator must obtain a current source-owner live record for any remaining +class-specific declaration/operation reconciliation before closing a workplan +with that residual; Gate House does not create or assign foreign tasks. This handoff does not duplicate those tasks, +re-open finished work solely from stale declaration metadata, or infer whole-class +emission completeness from delivered runtime rows. Its `layer.yaml` still declares +the three load-bearing event classes and guarantee owed/not yet declarable; source +owner must reconcile declared readiness with actual class-specific receipts before +any conformance report upgrades that finding. Historical AUDIT-WP-0009 pointers +in evidence-path design remain history rather than freshly verified live blockers. + +A confirmed local outbox or native human bind is not independent custody, complete +emission or honest display. GH-DEC-2026-014's commitment/content-availability limit +and compromised-surface residual remain. The carried Staff finding is not scored +closed by source declaration/pin PASS. + +Gate House T06 currently remains progress: human disposition is recorded and the +exact candidate row/text is handed off in its own source, but source-owner receipt +and accepted standard voice remain pending. INFD-IN-0007 is not falsely closed. +When the receiving owner retains real publication work, the parent can distinguish +completion of Gate House handoff from the still-pending standard adoption and update +T06 only within its recorded completion boundary. diff --git a/docs/evidence/2026-10-11-staff-evidence-human-disposition.json b/docs/evidence/2026-10-11-staff-evidence-human-disposition.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..939db2b --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/evidence/2026-10-11-staff-evidence-human-disposition.json @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ +{ + "record": "GH-DEC-2026-025", + "proposal": "GH-WP-0004-T06-r1", + "proposal_sha256": "08bc78a29c2b67cec0aafba993fb2d25312b629ecccb81458980baafe38e566a", + "submission_digest": "sha256:d2224fb5f8e577b1dd45b73fb01bf6c8880f1e7e167945e3a186b23738742609", + "native_memo_sha256": "28e006f53f695f85e99fda2fb5f461d11f31e4541b1c9239e12e1efc5eeb0de4", + "native_packet": [ + { + "item_id": "infd-20261011-staff-evidence-tension-packet", + "label": "Exact doctrine proposal with candidate text and source receipts", + "hash": "sha256:08bc78a29c2b67cec0aafba993fb2d25312b629ecccb81458980baafe38e566a" + }, + { + "item_id": "infd-20261011-staff-evidence-tension-source-owner-review", + "label": "NetKingdom technical owner review", + "hash": "sha256:70a58c10f44332ed53bbfbd6f74f3ee426896edb1e5b925dac6437a8c8444ce3" + }, + { + "item_id": "infd-20261011-staff-evidence-tension-sources", + "label": "Exact historical source receipts", + "hash": "sha256:e2d109b1e49b2fbcebe5d4e2b70e61a485020d47bd96c2af868ea7ae7a535323" + } + ], + "retained_outcome": { + "memo_id": "infd-20261011-staff-evidence-tension", + "review": { + "intake_state": "ready", + "memo_id": "review-2e615985-54c9-40d8-8547-b8fdcb10b1d6", + "path": "/review?memo_id=review-2e615985-54c9-40d8-8547-b8fdcb10b1d6", + "stale": false + }, + "disposition_count": 1, + "dispositions": [ + { + "id": null, + "approval_id": null, + "submission_state": "confirmed", + "disposition": { + "actor": { + "kind": "person", + "sub": "uid=platform-root,ou=people,dc=netkingdom,dc=local" + }, + "approval_id": "d90c899b-f25c-4e66-a003-808ee5b1324f", + "at": "2026-10-11T01:46:25Z", + "id": "disp-24e94200-ed93-4a18-900c-3128d26ba212", + "memo_id": "review-2e615985-54c9-40d8-8547-b8fdcb10b1d6", + "memo_version": 1, + "note": null, + "presentation_id": "pres-f44a4a5d-6998-422c-b46e-da7af46906f6", + "reasons": [], + "verb": "accept" + }, + "approved_at": "2026-10-11T01:46:25+00:00", + "decided_at": null + } + ] + }, + "authority_scope": "Confirmed native human acceptance of exact bounded doctrine proposal for source-owner follow-through. Not whole v0.9 ratification, accepted v0.8 edit, deployment, credentials or runtime conformity.", + "verification": { + "proposal_and_submission_pins": "matched", + "confirmed_human_accept": "matched", + "memo_version": 1, + "review_stale": false + }, + "carry_forward": [ + "Unresolved Staff/deterministic-evidence finding", + "Per-event load-bearing guarantees still owed; no runtime verification from this receipt", + "INFD-IN-0007 remains pending accepted standard voice; catalogue row pending publisher follow-through" + ] +} diff --git a/workplans/GH-WP-0004-section-11-layer-declarations.md b/workplans/GH-WP-0004-section-11-layer-declarations.md index 563d02d..a03c4be 100644 --- a/workplans/GH-WP-0004-section-11-layer-declarations.md +++ b/workplans/GH-WP-0004-section-11-layer-declarations.md @@ -152,6 +152,22 @@ reported honestly. Exact candidate text and alternatives are reviewable. No foun answer, source-owner assent, model publication or runtime evidence is inferred; INFD-IN-0007 and T06 remain open pending real disposition and row handoff. +2026-10-11 (confirmed human disposition): native memo +`infd-20261011-staff-evidence-tension@1`, review +`review-2e615985-54c9-40d8-8547-b8fdcb10b1d6`, is confirmed ACCEPT, non-stale, +by human platform-root at 01:46:25Z; approval +`d90c899b-f25c-4e66-a003-808ee5b1324f`, disposition +`disp-24e94200-ed93-4a18-900c-3128d26ba212`. +Recorded as `GH-DEC-2026-025`, pinned to original proposal SHA256 +`08bc78a29c2b67cec0aafba993fb2d25312b629ecccb81458980baafe38e566a` +and exact submission `d2224fb5f8e577b1dd45b73fb01bf6c8880f1e7e167945e3a186b23738742609`. +The [exact candidate row/text handoff](../docs/amendments/2026-10-11-staff-evidence-disposition-handoff.md) +is prepared for NetKingdom source-owner follow-through. Acceptance is only the +bounded doctrine disposition, not whole v0.9 ratification, accepted-v0.8 edit or live +execution. T06 stays progress pending real publisher receipt/standard-voice adoption; +INFD-IN-0007 and the Staff finding are not closed from a human memo alone. +Per-event emission obligations stay with their existing source-owner records. + ```task id: GH-WP-0004-T06 status: progress