coulomb/gate-house
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

repo.work.update_task_status GH-WP-0003-T06 -> done

Browse source 
correlation_id: 546838d2-2926-469b-993f-470735caddb2
reason: rmgr CLI
source: repo-manager

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 1754332@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 9c8ac536-ff5e-46a3-8ab1-a548bde25fc0
This commit is contained in:
repo-manager 2026-09-09 20:14:35 +02:00
parent d97e8efa6e
commit d1e5f8a3da
1 changed files with 27 additions and 11 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

38
workplans/GH-WP-0003-statute-v08-amendment-set.md
View file

@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ Place it in the statute where §8's three-way split is stated.
```task
id: GH-WP-0003-T06
status: progress
status: done
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "ecc01a7b-22df-5a9c-a29b-eb7559713ca7"
```
@ -216,15 +216,31 @@ v0.8 and it goes to the assent round rather than being imposed.
## T06 status
**Cut done, circulation open.** `net-kingdom/canon/standards/security-layer-model_v0.8.md`
exists as `status: proposed` at `net-kingdom@66eeaba`. All eight amendments applied,
plus a §15 entry, a §1 "what changed", a §16 reconciliation closing two questions and
opening one, and a rewritten §14. Section numbering is unchanged.
**Round closed 2026-09-09; publication handed to `net-kingdom`.**
`security-layer-model_v0.8.md` remains `status: proposed` at `net-kingdom@64394e9`.
The acceptance flip and publication are `net-kingdom`'s and it has confirmed it will
run them on round close. `security-layer-model_v0.7.md` stays `accepted` and in force
until then, unpatched.
`security-layer-model_v0.7.md` stays `accepted` and in force. It is not patched.
Four repositories returned text reviews — `access-engine` (four findings),
`approval-engine` (one partial plus three), `ops-warden` (two findings and one
agreement), and `net-kingdom` (§17 confirmed, §11 corrected in place at `da7747d`).
All are dispositioned in `docs/conformance/2026-09-06-v08-assent-round.md`.
Remaining under T06: the assent round, and recording the returned dispositions. Two
repositories carry a cost in this version and their review matters most —
`ops-warden` acquires a non-conformant `unknown` cell under A8, and `approval-engine`
acquires an issue-time digest obligation under A1/A5. Acceptance is `net-kingdom`'s
publication step once the round closes.
Nine corrections landed in the text during circulation, listed as §15 items 12–20. Two
rulings were substantive enough to carry their own records:
- **`GH-DEC-2026-010`** — a PEP must be able to *attribute* a decision to
`access-engine`, and obligation 2's digest test does not discharge obligation 1.
Fail-closed protects against a decision point that is absent, not against one that
lies. Carried as a declared §13 gap with `access-engine` as owner.
- **`GH-DEC-2026-011`** — `ops-warden`'s asked-for transitional `unknown: fail_open` is
**declined**; §13.1 records a dated classification-coverage figure beside each stance
instead. Also settles that a map must enumerate its axis and that an `absent` scope is
distinguishable from an `unknown` one — closing the §16 question this version opened.
**`kings-guard` and `audit-core` did not return a review.** §14 records that as *not
claimed*. The sections they were asked to attack — §9.5's criteria-grounding clause and
§12's step-four paragraph; §11's emission-guarantee wording — carry no assent from the
repository best placed to test them. That is a gap in the round, not a defect in the
text, and it does not block publication.