coulomb/gate-house
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Audit the v0.6 review findings against accepted v0.7

Browse source 
Marking the 2026-08-29 review round read on the reasoning that v0.7's
acceptance closed it was an inference, not a check. This does the check:
fifteen findings and two answered questions from kings-guard, ops-warden,
access-engine and audit-core, each traced to v0.7 text or a decision
record rather than to the §15 change log.

All fifteen are dispositioned. None was silently dropped. The change log
deliberately is not the evidence — kings-guard's finding 1 was exactly
the case where the change log claimed a rule the body did not contain.

One item surfaced, and it is not a v0.6 finding: §17 still says
emission-cadence ownership is proposed and unassented, which
GH-DEC-2026-004 and the info-tech-canon and net-kingdom acceptances have
since made false. Tracked as GH-WP-0003-T07.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WtJBr77gMFLrN93iEevqQJ

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 425128@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: f5944d8b-dac4-4e1a-87eb-8b3d8f314a63
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-09-06 01:38:09 +02:00
parent e16cd792b3
commit fcdcb0af9b
2 changed files with 113 additions and 0 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

17
workplans/GH-WP-0003-statute-v08-amendment-set.md
View file

@ -132,3 +132,20 @@ state_hub_task_id: "ecc01a7b-22df-5a9c-a29b-eb7559713ca7"
assent as v0.6 and v0.7 were, and hand to `net-kingdom` for publication. Record
dispositions of the returned findings. v0.7 stays accepted and unedited until v0.8
is accepted in its place.
```task
id: GH-WP-0003-T07
status: todo
priority: low
```
**§17 — refresh the ownership paragraph.** §17 closes with "Ownership is proposed,
not assigned… Neither has assented." `GH-DEC-2026-004` assigned the split and both
`info-tech-canon` (`ITC-WP-0018`, `ITC-EMISSION-CADENCE 0.1` in canon 0.7.0) and
`net-kingdom` (`NK-WP-0035`, `emission-cadence-security-profile_v0.1.md`) have
accepted in their own voice. Replace the paragraph with the settled ownership and
cite the decision; keep §17's drafter credit to `kings-guard`.
Surfaced by `docs/conformance/2026-09-06-v06-findings-audit.md`, which also confirms
that all fifteen v0.6 review findings are dispositioned in v0.7 — this is the one
paragraph a later decision made stale, not a missed finding.