The layer model is accepted at v0.7. References bumped from v0.4, and CLAUDE.md
now sends readers to net-kingdom/SECURITY-COMPANION.md as the working form, and
to ops-warden for how to get things done — doctrine is ours, the paths through
it are not.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 2564823@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 2a7ed827-4928-4b9f-8613-9135c9cadfe9
audit-core corrected a claim this repository's doctrine also makes. An
append-only archive with a verified hash chain proves records were not altered
or truncated after arrival; it cannot prove one was never sent. A suppressed
event leaves the chain intact and verification reports intact — and the event
an adversary most wants missing is the negative one: a revocation, a denial, a
containment action.
Adds the bound under the Core Rules, replacing "the audit record proves it
happened" with the sound form, and records that completeness is the emitting
system's obligation via atomic emission.
Flags outstanding doctrine work: the ASM Canon's control §27 and tests T-08 and
T-09 are written as though reconstruction from evidence were unconditional.
Also bumps standard references to v0.4.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 2564823@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 2a7ed827-4928-4b9f-8613-9135c9cadfe9
All three assent requests answered, each with a decision record and each with
a finding. Standard revised to v0.2 and accepted.
- history note gains §12 recording the outcome and what each repository
returned.
- README and CLAUDE.md now cite security-layer-model_v0.2.md.
- GH-WP-0001-T03 closed.
Three of the four v0.2 changes came from the assenting repositories rather
than from gate-house.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 2564823@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 2a7ed827-4928-4b9f-8613-9135c9cadfe9
The README described the withdrawn engine framing and stated "Gate House
authorizes", contradicting INTENT.md. It now leads with the Staff-layer
doctrine council role, the layer model, and the INV-02 argument for why
Gate House is not the decision point.
Its one already-correct sentence — Gate House as observability for governed
secrets under sound governance policy — is what the rewrite builds on.
Flags the Blueprint as predating the re-cut so readers are not misled by it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 2564823@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 2a7ed827-4928-4b9f-8613-9135c9cadfe9
