All three assent requests answered, each with a decision record and each with
a finding. Standard revised to v0.2 and accepted.
- history note gains §12 recording the outcome and what each repository
returned.
- README and CLAUDE.md now cite security-layer-model_v0.2.md.
- GH-WP-0001-T03 closed.
Three of the four v0.2 changes came from the assenting repositories rather
than from gate-house.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 2564823@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 2a7ed827-4928-4b9f-8613-9135c9cadfe9
The README described the withdrawn engine framing and stated "Gate House
authorizes", contradicting INTENT.md. It now leads with the Staff-layer
doctrine council role, the layer model, and the INV-02 argument for why
Gate House is not the decision point.
Its one already-correct sentence — Gate House as observability for governed
secrets under sound governance policy — is what the rewrite builds on.
Flags the Blueprint as predating the re-cut so readers are not misled by it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 2564823@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 2a7ed827-4928-4b9f-8613-9135c9cadfe9
