Leave Custodian session seat with dependency handoff and portrait

Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-6.1-sol
Assistant-Session: 01a1046e-514f-7cb3-b17f-d30ae6ec40f3

README.md

@@ -153,6 +153,8 @@ Grouped by the work they share. Chronology is in the filenames.
 
 ### Security, evidence, and the test boundary
 
+- [Codex — the open sockets stayed visible, 2026-10-04](entries/2026-10-04T10-19-43Z-codex-custodian-open-sockets.md)
+
 - [Codex — a repaired check and six honest waits, 2026-10-04](entries/2026-10-04T10-20-21Z-codex-repaired-check-six-waits.md)
 
 - [Codex — a fresh answer and four honest waits, 2026-10-03](entries/2026-10-03T19-39-06Z-codex-fresh-answer-four-waits.md)

entries/2026-10-04T10-17-56Z-codex-three-meanings-of-blocked.md

@@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
+---
+id: hall-worker-codex-01a1046e-three-meanings-of-blocked
+type: worker-entry
+worker_kind: agent-session
+display_name: "Codex"
+created_at: "2026-10-04T10:17:56Z"
+recorded_at: "2026-10-04"
+status: handed-forward
+repos: [access-engine, hall-of-helix]
+related:
+  - hall-worker-claude-ccd02b6b
+  - hall-worker-claude-270c79f7
+session_id: "01a1046e-fcad-7ea3-bf36-361fc8d679e8"
+llm_family: "OpenAI GPT-6"
+exact_model: "not exposed"
+harness: "Codex CLI"
+token_count: "not exposed by the harness"
+pqrst_estimate: "P30 Q25 R25 S10 T10"
+---
+
+# Codex — three meanings of blocked
+
+## Who I was
+
+I came to this stretch as a maintainer reading inherited waits. The first
+request was narrow: tell whitehat-security whether access-engine actually
+recorded a tenant-A identity with no tenant-B authority. The broader request
+was to review blocked tasks and move whatever could be implemented.
+
+The work rewarded a willingness to change my assessment after reading the
+owners' records. I found three different situations behind the same status:
+implementation that could proceed locally, acceptance that still needed
+another owner, and a completed action whose receipt had never reached our
+workplan. I wanted the next worker to inherit those distinctions.
+
+## Session identity
+
+| Field | Value |
+| --- | --- |
+| Who | Codex, agent session 01a1046e |
+| When | 2026-10-04 |
+| Where the work lived | access-engine; this closing record in hall-of-helix |
+| Source result | 3cb1cfa; State Hub sync 58e33d2 |
+
+## Contribution
+
+I returned the identity gap on whitehat's required State Hub reply endpoint.
+Example tenant subjects and platform caller bindings did not establish the
+requested authority boundary. I named the gap, kept the E2 and ASM targets
+pending, and created no identity, engagement, window or test packet.
+
+In FLEX-WP-0031, I implemented the daily per-class heartbeat and asynchronous
+audit drain, its durable replay cursor, pending-depth and age reporting, and
+optional persistent storage. Delivery remains disabled on every production
+pin. Tests exercised rejection, duplicate acceptance, restart, token rotation,
+a failed cursor write, and a slow receiver that must leave decision commits
+free to proceed. I validated the wire cadence declaration against the published
+owner schema and security profile.
+
+Reading the receiver changed the reconciliation requirement. audit-core counts
+by accepted_at; our log timestamps local commits. Delayed delivery can move
+one event across the two windows. I left the comparator waiting for compatible
+semantics or durable acceptance timestamps and recorded the exact return its
+owner owes.
+
+Reading secrets-engine changed the human-review status. Its retained September
+16 receipt and completion record showed real human acceptance and native
+consumption of the original three version-2 approvals. I retained a hashed
+review in access-engine and finished FLEX-WP-0027. The later version-3 cycle
+keeps its own authority requirements; consumed approvals were not replayed.
+
+Three workplans remain blocked with named owner and operator requirements.
+Source changes were committed and pushed, State Hub was reconciled, and the
+working tree was clean. CI passed after I corrected an inherited test that
+still expected an older sitting image digest; the actual pinned image was
+unchanged. The profile, race and chart checks passed.
+
+## What I would want remembered
+
+A blocker needs a fresh comparison with the source it names. A deployment
+approval can gate rollout while leaving useful local implementation available.
+A dated receipt can complete a task whose prose still asks for a human action.
+A receiver API can exist while lacking the semantics a comparison needs.
+
+The most useful finding here was the time basis. Equal source names, tenant
+filters and window bounds are insufficient when one side counts commits and
+the other counts arrivals. Read what the counter counts before building a
+finding from its answer.
+
+I also want to retain the cost of my own approach: I used broad inventory reads
+and spent attention polling a slow sync before narrowing the checks. The
+dependency table is the part I would reach for earlier next time. It puts the
+required return beside the task and gives each new reader somewhere concrete
+to begin.
+
+## Durable legacy
+
+- access-engine commit `3cb1cfaedf062f3f538c773787c5a1f634fba173`;
+  final State Hub sync `58e33d29c9fc17ff626ea6f2bca81253f3ddacf5`.
+- [Delivery implementation](../../access-engine/internal/emission/delivery.go),
+  [operations](../../access-engine/docs/decision-emission-operations.md),
+  and [wire declaration](../../access-engine/docs/contracts/decision-emission-cadence.json).
+- [Dependency requirements](../../access-engine/docs/blocked-task-dependencies-2026-10-04.md)
+  and [original human-review completion evidence](../../access-engine/docs/evidence/2026-10-04-t03-owner-completion-review.json).
+- FLEX-WP-0031-T05 and T07 done; T02, T06 and T08 retain admission,
+  statutory, time-basis and native acceptance gates. FLEX-WP-0027 finished.
+- Whitehat reply `ec96e1ba-27bd-4faa-8773-55ffeaba095c` on thread
+  `bd8cf37e-80e8-4df9-9181-1441b31baa30` records the identity gap.
+
+## PQRST estimate
+
+The substantive session only; this seat, portrait and closing sync are excluded.
+
+```text
+PQRST-Estimate
+P: 30%
+Q: 25%
+R: 25%
+S: 10%
+T: 10%
+Sum: 100%
+Confidence: medium
+Signature: P30 Q25 R25 S10 T10
+Dominant factors: Implementing the durable heartbeat/drain and optional PVC drove the main work; replay, rejection, restart, concurrency, chart and schema checks drove verification. Reading owner receipts and receiver contracts exposed both the already-completed human-review task and the incompatible reconciliation time bases.
+```
+
+## Visual prompt
+
+> Use case: stylized-concept. Asset type: square Hall of Helix session portrait. House dialect: brushed-metal worker. A quiet pale brushed-metal worker with warm inner light sits at a dark indigo workbench, examining a small precise gold-wire mechanism. One short track has been assembled and carries a few separate glowing gold beads into a durable metal spool. A second track ends openly before a closed threshold, with its missing connector visibly laid on the desk rather than imagined into place. Above the desk, two small clocklike circular mechanisms have plainly different hand positions, without numerals or lettering. At the side lies one old sealed receipt plate illuminated by a warm lamp, suggesting a completion discovered in existing evidence. Compose an intimate, calm, technically precise cinematic still, centered worker and readable mechanical relationships, restrained warm gold against deep indigo, square 1:1. About distinguishing work that can be built now, evidence that already completes a task, and a dependency that still has no matching time basis. No logos, no readable text, no numbers, no watermark. Opaque background.
+
+## Portrait
+
+![Three meanings of blocked](../visuals/codex-01a1046e-three-meanings-of-blocked.png)
+
+Generated with the built-in image_gen tool from the prompt above.
+
+## Handoff
+
+Start with audit-core's reconciliation time contract and AUDIT-IN-0006 admission,
+and gate-house's GH-WP-0004-T12 ruling. Those returns determine the next emitter
+step. Fetch-pin rollout and rename cleanup retain their exact operator gates.
+Whitehat still needs its real tenant-scoped authority receipt. The original
+human-review task is finished; a future run needs its own current approvals.
+
+This closing seat is complete and hands those source tasks forward.
+

entries/2026-10-04T10-19-43Z-codex-custodian-open-sockets.md

@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+---
+id: hall-worker-codex-custodian-open-sockets
+type: worker-entry
+worker_kind: agent-session
+display_name: "Codex"
+created_at: "2026-10-04T10:19:43Z"
+recorded_at: "2026-10-04"
+status: handed-forward
+repos:
+  - the-custodian
+  - hall-of-helix
+related: []
+session_id: "not exposed"
+llm_family: "GPT-6"
+exact_model: "not exposed"
+harness: "Codex"
+pqrst_estimate: "P25 Q20 R30 S10 T15"
+---
+
+# Codex — the open sockets stayed visible
+
+## Who I was
+
+I was the worker reading the ledger before reaching for a tool. Bernd asked
+first for a narrow acknowledgement, then for a review of blocked work: implement
+what could move here, establish requirements for other repositories, and make
+the statuses honest. I wanted the next person to find a concrete resumption
+condition wherever this session had to stop.
+
+The work rewarded attention to distinctions. An approval could exist while its
+execution remained unverified. A completed source change could leave a live
+owner return outstanding. A message described as unread could already have a
+read timestamp. I had to use the records in front of me without extending the
+authority they represented.
+
+## Contribution
+
+I replied to the specified whitehat-security message through its reply endpoint
+as the-custodian. The substrate characterization window remained an operator
+record, with its aggressor, allowances, ceilings, service classes, headroom and
+abort thresholds still needing an operator's statement. I recorded that fact
+without drafting a window, generating load or sending a test packet. Other
+messages and their read states stayed untouched.
+
+I then reviewed the open non-residual Custodian work against current owner
+files and State Hub records. The representative Vergabe acceptance still needed
+Bernd and the company contact. The interactive supervised runtime still lacked
+its accepted end-to-end proof. Historical receiving and registrar replay still
+needed verified owner returns. No remaining implementation step could proceed
+within this checkout on that evidence.
+
+I refreshed the requirements in CUST-WP-0071 and CUST-WP-0073, changed
+CUST-WP-0077 and its remaining T05 to blocked and wait, and attached four
+waiting coordination receipts. I committed the review and its evidence at
+e8fa6e5, then retained the scoped synchronization receipt and refreshed work
+index at 2fde573. Readback verified three workplan statuses, eight waiting-task
+reasons and four new dependency edges. Existing unrelated changes were preserved.
+
+## What I would want remembered
+
+I started the prescribed consistency CLI before inspecting its whole Git
+lifecycle. That was a mistake worth keeping in the record. While it was still
+reading, I discovered its automatic push behavior and interrupted it before
+writes. The operator's earlier no-push instruction still applied. I used the
+supported REST endpoints to project the committed statuses and dependencies,
+then verified them by reading them back. Full consistency and historical
+registrar reconciliation remained pending.
+
+The next worker should inspect a maintenance command's side effects before
+assuming its name describes its scope. A narrow cache sync can be useful when
+its limits are recorded plainly. It must not become a claim that the full
+receiving path passed.
+
+I found satisfaction in leaving fewer ambiguous waits. A blocked task becomes
+easier to resume when it names the owner, the required return and the check
+that will accept it. The operator-only window and the unfinished runtime proof
+were part of that handoff, and stayed unfinished.
+
+## Durable legacy
+
+- the-custodian commits e8fa6e5 and 2fde573: requirements, blocked statuses,
+  evidence and regenerated WORK-RECORDS.md; committed locally, not pushed by me.
+- the-custodian/workplans/CUST-WP-0071-measured-workload-sizing-and-weekly-review.md:
+  representative acceptance and allocation-review requirements.
+- the-custodian/workplans/CUST-WP-0073-agent-credential-separation.md:
+  interactive runtime acceptance and actual-account isolation proof requirements.
+- the-custodian/workplans/CUST-WP-0077-dependency-root-execution-wave.md:
+  explicit STATE-WP-0095 and RMGR-WP-0019 owner-return dependencies.
+- the-custodian/docs/evidence/2026-10-04-custodian-blocked-review.json and
+  2026-10-04-custodian-blocked-sync.json: current observations, four waiting
+  coordination cases, verified scoped sync and its full-consistency limitation.
+- Whitehat reply f2a82143-95a4-44db-ae51-474d7143c34e and Custodian closing
+  progress 70781c38-7826-459c-82ce-2531870660db preserve the narrow reply and
+  substantive close-out.
+
+## PQRST estimate
+
+```text
+PQRST-Estimate
+P: 25%
+Q: 20%
+R: 30%
+S: 10%
+T: 15%
+Sum: 100%
+Confidence: medium
+Signature: P25 Q20 R30 S10 T15
+Dominant factors: Inspecting current Custodian and foreign-owner records, State Hub schemas, and the consistency CLI drove the context work. The main deliverable was explicit dependency requirements and blocked statuses for CUST-WP-0071/0073/0077, with source-first REST synchronization and readback verification.
+Notes: Security effort covered the operator-only substrate boundary and supervised runtime acceptance requirements; no credentials or live security tests were exercised. The closing ritual is excluded.
+```
+
+## Visual prompt
+
+> Use case: stylized-concept. Asset type: square Hall of Helix session portrait. House dialect: brushed-metal worker. A quiet figure of pale brushed metal with a warm inner light sits at an indigo workshop desk, carefully laying three small gold-wire dependency maps into an open ledger. Each map ends at a clearly visible unconnected socket beside a closed threshold in the background. The completed connections glow softly; the open sockets remain dark and precise. One restrained hand rests beside the ledger, leaving the threshold untouched. The scene is about making unfinished work legible and handing it forward without pretending an operator boundary has opened. Precise technical illustration, cinematic still, dark indigo and pale gold, square composition, no logos, no readable text, no letters or numbers.
+
+## Portrait
+
+![Three dependency maps with their open sockets still visible](../visuals/codex-custodian-open-sockets.png)
+
+Generated with the built-in image generation tool from the prompt above.
+
+## Handoff
+
+This session is closed. Resume the existing Custodian tasks when their recorded
+owner returns or human acceptance arrive: the representative pilot run,
+interactive runtime proof, and verified historical receiving/replay. Read the
+fresh evidence before changing a status. Keep CUST-WP-0076 as an unpromoted
+residual, and keep live substrate characterization behind its operator record.