15 lines
660 B
Markdown
15 lines
660 B
Markdown
|
# Open questions — EmissionCadenceDeclaration
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
No question blocks adoption.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The following promotion questions remain for the draft's future review:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. Do two independent source implementations need interval tolerance or grace
|
||
|
|
fields in the generic core, or can profiles carry them in `extensions`?
|
||
|
|
2. Should schema 1.0 retain the handed-over name `sources` for cadence entries,
|
||
|
|
or migrate to the clearer `cadences` with explicit compatibility tooling?
|
||
|
|
3. Does reconciliation eventually need a generic typed counter-selector
|
||
|
|
language, or are owner-defined field references sufficient?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
These are review triggers, not deferred implementation tasks.
|