coulomb/info-tech-canon
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
info-tech-canon/infospace/views/by-concept.md

786 lines
55 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

Add validation indexes and generated views
2026-05-23 03:32:16 +02:00
<!-- GENERATED by info_tech_canon; do not edit by hand. -->
# By Concept
Resolve the two senses of Authority and declare the unowned remainder (T05, T07) R-3 is resolved by disambiguation without a rename. CARING section 10.7 now says its Authority exposure mode names a demanding party rather than a right, links to ITC-ORG section 10.17, and notes that such an Authority holds no organizational authority over the system it compels. ITC-ORG carries the reciprocal sentence and records that SecurityCanon's AuthMode qualifies the exercise of the right rather than redefining it. The seventeen concepts no artifact declared are now declared: eleven to the Organization Model, four to CARING and two to the Capability Model. Capacity in the Organization Model and Capacity behaviour in the Capability Model are two concepts, not one, and neither moves. Two of CARING's four turned out not to be new concepts at all but the prose spellings of CaringCapabilityProfile and CaringDerivedCapability; both spellings are declared to the same owner so the name a reader meets resolves. Effective Access and Declared Access were genuinely undeclared. Three boundary reviews are added for organization, caring and capability, bringing the count to fourteen. The concept_defined_without_owner warning is at zero, and the test that asserted it fires now proves it on a modified corpus instead of on the live one. make check passes with 54 tests, clean validation, no warnings, no stale assets. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 3588@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 24b80f66-e5a7-4e61-99fe-2d422e6d17da
2026-09-20 23:32:57 +02:00
Concept count: **769**
Add validation indexes and generated views
2026-05-23 03:32:16 +02:00
| Concept | Owner | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
Distribute frozen federation corpus by concept destination Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a070b5-4994-7271-bd8b-7c3dbcedec4b
2026-09-06 00:44:37 +02:00
| Canon federation research provenance | `assimilation/canon-federation` | `artifact_title` |
Implement canon conformance and maintenance optimizations Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a06e82-3e08-7042-a79d-438ac6eed8db
2026-09-05 00:50:09 +02:00
| Assimilation — EmissionCadenceDeclaration handover | `assimilation/emission-cadence` | `artifact_title` |
Assimilate ITCC v0.1 as Capability Model; canon 0.2.0 Define the intake and assimilation practice (incoming/ drop zone -> frozen source snapshot -> Minimal Assimilation Profile -> disposition gate -> canon transformation -> versioned change notes) and run it on the first inputs. - infospace/assimilation/intake-and-assimilation-practice.md, incoming/README.md - assimilation/it-capability-canon: frozen source, comparison matrix, 26 mappings, 8 proposed changes, 7 open questions, decision record (adapt) - new model ITC-CAP with 41-capability machine-readable catalog, anchored to owning canon models; CILM rejected, Profile renamed, Provision made explicit - registered in canon.yaml / artifacts index / infospace.yaml; regenerated briefs, indexes, views; canon version 0.1.0-scaffold -> 0.2.0 + CHANGELOG - ITC-WP-0014 for promotion work; ITC-WP-0013 added to the workplan registry make validate: ok (65 artifacts, 0 errors/warnings). make test: 22 passed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-14 20:54:32 +02:00
| Assimilation — IT Capability Canon (ITCC) v0.1 | `assimilation/it-capability-canon` | `artifact_title` |
Add CARING Kubernetes RBAC benchmark
2026-05-23 06:53:30 +02:00
| CARING Kubernetes RBAC Benchmark | `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac` | `artifact_title` |
| Kubernetes RBAC CARING Access Descriptors | `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac/access-descriptors` | `artifact_title` |
| Kubernetes RBAC To CARING Mapping | `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac/caring-mapping` | `artifact_title` |
| Kubernetes RBAC Benchmark Findings And Canon Pressure | `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac/findings` | `artifact_title` |
| Kubernetes RBAC Native Concept Map | `benchmark/caring/kubernetes-rbac/native-concepts` | `artifact_title` |
Assimilate ITCC v0.1 as Capability Model; canon 0.2.0 Define the intake and assimilation practice (incoming/ drop zone -> frozen source snapshot -> Minimal Assimilation Profile -> disposition gate -> canon transformation -> versioned change notes) and run it on the first inputs. - infospace/assimilation/intake-and-assimilation-practice.md, incoming/README.md - assimilation/it-capability-canon: frozen source, comparison matrix, 26 mappings, 8 proposed changes, 7 open questions, decision record (adapt) - new model ITC-CAP with 41-capability machine-readable catalog, anchored to owning canon models; CILM rejected, Profile renamed, Provision made explicit - registered in canon.yaml / artifacts index / infospace.yaml; regenerated briefs, indexes, views; canon version 0.1.0-scaffold -> 0.2.0 + CHANGELOG - ITC-WP-0014 for promotion work; ITC-WP-0013 added to the workplan registry make validate: ok (65 artifacts, 0 errors/warnings). make test: 22 passed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-14 20:54:32 +02:00
| InfoTechCanon Capability Catalog | `capability-catalog/itc-cap` | `artifact_title` |
Canon 0.6.0 freeze: ITC-CAP draft, AVT catalog, joinable review Finish ITC-WP-0013 (AttributeValueType under ITC-DATA) and ITC-WP-0014 T02/T03/T05/T06/T07. Capability contract schemas, live-catalog review CLI, landscape/kernel-map pointers. Sit on this version.
2026-08-15 19:42:30 +02:00
| InfoTechCanon Attribute Value Type Catalog | `catalog/attribute-value-types` | `artifact_title` |
Canon 0.4.0: joinable consumer proof and EvidenceBasis §10.3 now accepts a consumer record that validates against the live catalog; resource-control's backup restatement is that proof. ITC-GOV gains EvidenceBasis in tiers (invoiced and measured are peers) and ITC-CAP requires it on every consumption row (CAP-R10).
2026-08-15 19:14:11 +02:00
| InfoTechCanon Evidence Basis Catalog | `catalog/evidence-basis` | `artifact_title` |
Add repo-scoping comparison assets
2026-05-23 06:07:18 +02:00
| Repo Scoping Canon Benefit Analysis | `comparison/repo-scoping/canon-benefit-analysis` | `artifact_title` |
| Repo Scoping Consumer Workplan Brief | `comparison/repo-scoping/consumer-workplan-brief` | `artifact_title` |
| Repo Scoping Canon Extension Candidates | `comparison/repo-scoping/extension-candidates` | `artifact_title` |
| Repo Scoping Canon Comparison Frame | `comparison/repo-scoping/frame` | `artifact_title` |
| Repo Scoping Canon Comparison Report | `comparison/repo-scoping/report` | `artifact_title` |
Register limited Family concept-area seed Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a070b5-4994-7271-bd8b-7c3dbcedec4b
2026-09-06 00:26:29 +02:00
| Family concept-area seed | `concept-area/family` | `artifact_title` |
| Family | `concept-area/family` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
Add purpose and demand model extension
2026-05-23 04:59:16 +02:00
| Purpose And Consumer Demand Concept Catalog | `concept-catalog/purpose-demand` | `artifact_title` |
Add railiance-fabric conformance support pack
2026-05-23 05:35:11 +02:00
| Railiance Fabric Canon Conformance Pack | `conformance/railiance-fabric` | `artifact_title` |
| Railiance Fabric Consumer Workplan Brief | `conformance/railiance-fabric/consumer-workplan-brief` | `artifact_title` |
| Railiance Fabric Entity And Edge Capture Criteria | `conformance/railiance-fabric/entity-edge-capture-criteria` | `artifact_title` |
| Railiance Fabric Mapping Expectations | `conformance/railiance-fabric/mapping-expectations` | `artifact_title` |
| Railiance Fabric Visualization Examples | `conformance/railiance-fabric/visualization-examples` | `artifact_title` |
Add user-engine evaluation readiness pack
2026-05-23 05:18:54 +02:00
| User Engine Canon Evaluation Pack | `evaluation/user-engine` | `artifact_title` |
| User Engine Consumer Workplan Brief | `evaluation/user-engine/consumer-workplan-brief` | `artifact_title` |
| User Engine Canon Interface Card Expectations | `evaluation/user-engine/interface-card-expectations` | `artifact_title` |
| User Engine Canon Evaluation Questions | `evaluation/user-engine/questions` | `artifact_title` |
| User Engine Small SaaS Alignment Lens | `evaluation/user-engine/small-saas-alignment` | `artifact_title` |
Add purpose and demand model extension
2026-05-23 04:59:16 +02:00
| Canon-Side Consumer Purpose Portfolio | `example/consumer-purpose-portfolio` | `artifact_title` |
Implement canon conformance and maintenance optimizations Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a06e82-3e08-7042-a79d-438ac6eed8db
2026-09-05 00:50:09 +02:00
| Qonto Assistant Emission Cadence Worked Example | `example/emission-cadence/qonto-assistant` | `artifact_title` |
Publish reciprocal canon federation interface Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a070b5-4994-7271-bd8b-7c3dbcedec4b
2026-09-06 01:00:12 +02:00
| InfoTechCanon federation interface | `interface-card/canon-federation` | `artifact_title` |
Add validation indexes and generated views
2026-05-23 03:32:16 +02:00
| InfoTechCanon Core | `kernel/itc-core` | `artifact_title` |
Declare concepts and review boundaries for the silent artifacts (T02) Twelve of the thirteen artifacts that declared nothing now declare what they define, together with the map-assigned concepts the Organization Model was missing and the Landscape seed concepts the extractor cannot see because they are listed rather than defined in prose. The ownership index grows from 164 entries to 750, undeclared prose definitions fall from 637 to 57, and there are no ownership conflicts. The 57 that remain are overlaps this round assigned to another owner: imports, each recorded in a boundary review. The kernel map declares nothing, deliberately, because it assigns concepts to owners rather than defining them. It is now the only silent artifact and the suite asserts that, so an artifact added without declarations fails. itc-org:Authority is declared, with Actor, Ownership, Membership, Role, Responsibility and Accountability, which SecurityCanon and the identity model already treat as organization-owned. The regression test that previously asserted the blind spot now asserts that the kernel map's assignment and the declaration agree. Profile is deliberately left undeclared. The kernel map assigns it to Core, the identity model owns it under accepted CUST-ADR-006, and Observability defines a runtime performance profile. Three senses need a decision, not a declaration, so it is recorded as open rather than forced. Eleven boundary reviews are added beside the artifacts they describe, in the shape the identity model has used since INFO-WP-0021. The largest finding is that Core and the Information Space model restate eight provenance concepts in nearly identical words; Core owns them and Information Space imports. Label, Drift, Summary and Attribute are resolved by disambiguation rather than transfer. make check passes with 50 tests, clean validation, no stale generated assets. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 3588@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 24b80f66-e5a7-4e61-99fe-2d422e6d17da
2026-09-20 23:19:22 +02:00
| Activity | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AgentBrief | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AgentReference | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Alias | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Ambiguity | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Assimilation | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CanonArtifact | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CanonInterfaceCard | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Canonical Owner | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ChangeRecord | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Concept | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Conflict | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ConformanceLevel | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DecisionRecord | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Drift | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ExternalReference | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Gap | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Import | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Influence | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Label | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Mapping | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Namespace | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| OpenQuestion | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Overlap | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Pattern | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ProvenanceRecord | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| RelationshipDefinition | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Source | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Standard | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ValidationResult | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ValidationRule | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Version | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| VersionRecord | `kernel/itc-core` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
Add validation indexes and generated views
2026-05-23 03:32:16 +02:00
| InfoTechCanon Kernel Map | `kernel/itc-kernel-map` | `artifact_title` |
Canon 0.6.0 freeze: ITC-CAP draft, AVT catalog, joinable review Finish ITC-WP-0013 (AttributeValueType under ITC-DATA) and ITC-WP-0014 T02/T03/T05/T06/T07. Capability contract schemas, live-catalog review CLI, landscape/kernel-map pointers. Sit on this version.
2026-08-15 19:42:30 +02:00
| ITC-CAP concept mappings to anchoring canon models | `mapping/capability-anchors` | `artifact_title` |
Implement canon conformance and maintenance optimizations Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a06e82-3e08-7042-a79d-438ac6eed8db
2026-09-05 00:50:09 +02:00
| Emission cadence handover mappings | `mapping/emission-cadence-handover` | `artifact_title` |
Add purpose and demand model extension
2026-05-23 04:59:16 +02:00
| Purpose Demand Governance Extension Candidates | `mapping/purpose-demand-governance-candidates` | `artifact_title` |
Add validation indexes and generated views
2026-05-23 03:32:16 +02:00
| InfoTechCanon Access Control Model | `model/access-control` | `artifact_title` |
Declare concepts and review boundaries for the silent artifacts (T02) Twelve of the thirteen artifacts that declared nothing now declare what they define, together with the map-assigned concepts the Organization Model was missing and the Landscape seed concepts the extractor cannot see because they are listed rather than defined in prose. The ownership index grows from 164 entries to 750, undeclared prose definitions fall from 637 to 57, and there are no ownership conflicts. The 57 that remain are overlaps this round assigned to another owner: imports, each recorded in a boundary review. The kernel map declares nothing, deliberately, because it assigns concepts to owners rather than defining them. It is now the only silent artifact and the suite asserts that, so an artifact added without declarations fails. itc-org:Authority is declared, with Actor, Ownership, Membership, Role, Responsibility and Accountability, which SecurityCanon and the identity model already treat as organization-owned. The regression test that previously asserted the blind spot now asserts that the kernel map's assignment and the declaration agree. Profile is deliberately left undeclared. The kernel map assigns it to Core, the identity model owns it under accepted CUST-ADR-006, and Observability defines a runtime performance profile. Three senses need a decision, not a declaration, so it is recorded as open rather than forced. Eleven boundary reviews are added beside the artifacts they describe, in the shape the identity model has used since INFO-WP-0021. The largest finding is that Core and the Information Space model restate eight provenance concepts in nearly identical words; Core owns them and Information Space imports. Label, Drift, Summary and Attribute are resolved by disambiguation rather than transfer. make check passes with 50 tests, clean validation, no stale generated assets. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 3588@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 24b80f66-e5a7-4e61-99fe-2d422e6d17da
2026-09-20 23:19:22 +02:00
| AccessCertification | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AccessControlEntity | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AccessFinding | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AccessRemediation | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AccessReview | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AccessRole | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AccessSession | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AgentAccess | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AuthenticatedSubject | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AuthenticationStrengthReference | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AuthorizationDecision | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AuthorizationRequest | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| BreakGlassAccess | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Condition | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CredentialReference | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DecisionReason | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DelegatedAccess | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Denial | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Entitlement | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| EvaluationContext | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ExcessAccess | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Grant | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| IdentityReference | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| JustInTimeAccess | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Operation | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| OrphanedAccess | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Permission | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| PolicyAdministrationPoint | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| PolicyBinding | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| PolicyDecisionPoint | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| PolicyEnforcementPoint | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| PolicyInformationPoint | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| PolicyRetrievalPoint | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Principal | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Privilege | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ProtectedResource | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| RelationshipTuple | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Resource | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ResourceAction | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ResourceScope | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| RoleBinding | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ServiceAccountAccess | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| StaleAccess | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Subject | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TemporaryAccess | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TokenReference | `model/access-control` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
Assimilate ITCC v0.1 as Capability Model; canon 0.2.0 Define the intake and assimilation practice (incoming/ drop zone -> frozen source snapshot -> Minimal Assimilation Profile -> disposition gate -> canon transformation -> versioned change notes) and run it on the first inputs. - infospace/assimilation/intake-and-assimilation-practice.md, incoming/README.md - assimilation/it-capability-canon: frozen source, comparison matrix, 26 mappings, 8 proposed changes, 7 open questions, decision record (adapt) - new model ITC-CAP with 41-capability machine-readable catalog, anchored to owning canon models; CILM rejected, Profile renamed, Provision made explicit - registered in canon.yaml / artifacts index / infospace.yaml; regenerated briefs, indexes, views; canon version 0.1.0-scaffold -> 0.2.0 + CHANGELOG - ITC-WP-0014 for promotion work; ITC-WP-0013 added to the workplan registry make validate: ok (65 artifacts, 0 errors/warnings). make test: 22 passed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-14 20:54:32 +02:00
| InfoTechCanon Capability Model | `model/capability` | `artifact_title` |
Resolve the two senses of Authority and declare the unowned remainder (T05, T07) R-3 is resolved by disambiguation without a rename. CARING section 10.7 now says its Authority exposure mode names a demanding party rather than a right, links to ITC-ORG section 10.17, and notes that such an Authority holds no organizational authority over the system it compels. ITC-ORG carries the reciprocal sentence and records that SecurityCanon's AuthMode qualifies the exercise of the right rather than redefining it. The seventeen concepts no artifact declared are now declared: eleven to the Organization Model, four to CARING and two to the Capability Model. Capacity in the Organization Model and Capacity behaviour in the Capability Model are two concepts, not one, and neither moves. Two of CARING's four turned out not to be new concepts at all but the prose spellings of CaringCapabilityProfile and CaringDerivedCapability; both spellings are declared to the same owner so the name a reader meets resolves. Effective Access and Declared Access were genuinely undeclared. Three boundary reviews are added for organization, caring and capability, bringing the count to fourteen. The concept_defined_without_owner warning is at zero, and the test that asserted it fires now proves it on a modified corpus instead of on the live one. make check passes with 54 tests, clean validation, no warnings, no stale assets. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 3588@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 24b80f66-e5a7-4e61-99fe-2d422e6d17da
2026-09-20 23:32:57 +02:00
| Capacity behaviour | `model/capability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Supply | `model/capability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
Assimilate ITCC v0.1 as Capability Model; canon 0.2.0 Define the intake and assimilation practice (incoming/ drop zone -> frozen source snapshot -> Minimal Assimilation Profile -> disposition gate -> canon transformation -> versioned change notes) and run it on the first inputs. - infospace/assimilation/intake-and-assimilation-practice.md, incoming/README.md - assimilation/it-capability-canon: frozen source, comparison matrix, 26 mappings, 8 proposed changes, 7 open questions, decision record (adapt) - new model ITC-CAP with 41-capability machine-readable catalog, anchored to owning canon models; CILM rejected, Profile renamed, Provision made explicit - registered in canon.yaml / artifacts index / infospace.yaml; regenerated briefs, indexes, views; canon version 0.1.0-scaffold -> 0.2.0 + CHANGELOG - ITC-WP-0014 for promotion work; ITC-WP-0013 added to the workplan registry make validate: ok (65 artifacts, 0 errors/warnings). make test: 22 passed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-14 20:54:32 +02:00
| Capability | `model/capability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CapabilityDomain | `model/capability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CapabilityProfile | `model/capability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CapabilityContract | `model/capability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CapabilityRequirement | `model/capability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CapabilityProvider | `model/capability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CapabilityProvision | `model/capability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CapabilityMaturityLevel | `model/capability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CapabilityQualityDimension | `model/capability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CapabilityEvidenceHook | `model/capability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CapabilityResourceClass | `model/capability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
Canon 0.3.0: capability provision economics (ITC-CAP 0.2.0) Accept resource-control demand: move resource classes onto provisions, let requirements carry targets and constraints, add human-effort class H with native-unit consumption. Model stays proposed.
2026-08-15 18:19:30 +02:00
| CapabilityConsumption | `model/capability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
Assimilate ITCC v0.1 as Capability Model; canon 0.2.0 Define the intake and assimilation practice (incoming/ drop zone -> frozen source snapshot -> Minimal Assimilation Profile -> disposition gate -> canon transformation -> versioned change notes) and run it on the first inputs. - infospace/assimilation/intake-and-assimilation-practice.md, incoming/README.md - assimilation/it-capability-canon: frozen source, comparison matrix, 26 mappings, 8 proposed changes, 7 open questions, decision record (adapt) - new model ITC-CAP with 41-capability machine-readable catalog, anchored to owning canon models; CILM rejected, Profile renamed, Provision made explicit - registered in canon.yaml / artifacts index / infospace.yaml; regenerated briefs, indexes, views; canon version 0.1.0-scaffold -> 0.2.0 + CHANGELOG - ITC-WP-0014 for promotion work; ITC-WP-0013 added to the workplan registry make validate: ok (65 artifacts, 0 errors/warnings). make test: 22 passed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-14 20:54:32 +02:00
| CapabilityInclusionRule | `model/capability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
Add validation indexes and generated views
2026-05-23 03:32:16 +02:00
| InfoTechCanon Data Model | `model/data` | `artifact_title` |
Declare concepts and review boundaries for the silent artifacts (T02) Twelve of the thirteen artifacts that declared nothing now declare what they define, together with the map-assigned concepts the Organization Model was missing and the Landscape seed concepts the extractor cannot see because they are listed rather than defined in prose. The ownership index grows from 164 entries to 750, undeclared prose definitions fall from 637 to 57, and there are no ownership conflicts. The 57 that remain are overlaps this round assigned to another owner: imports, each recorded in a boundary review. The kernel map declares nothing, deliberately, because it assigns concepts to owners rather than defining them. It is now the only silent artifact and the suite asserts that, so an artifact added without declarations fails. itc-org:Authority is declared, with Actor, Ownership, Membership, Role, Responsibility and Accountability, which SecurityCanon and the identity model already treat as organization-owned. The regression test that previously asserted the blind spot now asserts that the kernel map's assignment and the declaration agree. Profile is deliberately left undeclared. The kernel map assigns it to Core, the identity model owns it under accepted CUST-ADR-006, and Observability defines a runtime performance profile. Three senses need a decision, not a declaration, so it is recorded as open rather than forced. Eleven boundary reviews are added beside the artifacts they describe, in the shape the identity model has used since INFO-WP-0021. The largest finding is that Core and the Information Space model restate eight provenance concepts in nearly identical words; Core owns them and Information Space imports. Label, Drift, Summary and Attribute are resolved by disambiguation rather than transfer. make check passes with 50 tests, clean validation, no stale generated assets. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 3588@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 24b80f66-e5a7-4e61-99fe-2d422e6d17da
2026-09-20 23:19:22 +02:00
| Attribute | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AttributeValueType | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| BreakingChange | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| BusinessTerm | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CodeList | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CompatibilityRule | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Constraint | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ConsumerExpectation | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DataAccessPattern | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DataAvailability | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DataCategory | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DataClassification | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DataContract | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DataDefinition | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DataDistribution | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DataDomain | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DataElement | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DataElementConcept | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DataEntity | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DataFlow | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DataFreshness | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DataLineage | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DataObject | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DataProduct | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DataQualityCheck | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DataQualityDimension | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DataQualityIssue | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DataQualityResult | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DataQualityRule | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DataResidency | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DataService | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DataStoreReference | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DataSubjectCategory | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DataType | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DataUsageConstraint | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Dataset | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DatasetSeries | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Derivation | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Field | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| FitnessForUse | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| GlossaryTerm | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| MasterDataReference | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ProcessingPurpose | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ProducerExpectation | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Record | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ReferenceData | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Representation | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| RetentionRuleReference | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| SchemaEvolutionPolicy | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Sensitivity | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Transformation | `model/data` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
Add validation indexes and generated views
2026-05-23 03:32:16 +02:00
| InfoTechCanon DevSecOps Model | `model/devsecops` | `artifact_title` |
Declare concepts and review boundaries for the silent artifacts (T02) Twelve of the thirteen artifacts that declared nothing now declare what they define, together with the map-assigned concepts the Organization Model was missing and the Landscape seed concepts the extractor cannot see because they are listed rather than defined in prose. The ownership index grows from 164 entries to 750, undeclared prose definitions fall from 637 to 57, and there are no ownership conflicts. The 57 that remain are overlaps this round assigned to another owner: imports, each recorded in a boundary review. The kernel map declares nothing, deliberately, because it assigns concepts to owners rather than defining them. It is now the only silent artifact and the suite asserts that, so an artifact added without declarations fails. itc-org:Authority is declared, with Actor, Ownership, Membership, Role, Responsibility and Accountability, which SecurityCanon and the identity model already treat as organization-owned. The regression test that previously asserted the blind spot now asserts that the kernel map's assignment and the declaration agree. Profile is deliberately left undeclared. The kernel map assigns it to Core, the identity model owns it under accepted CUST-ADR-006, and Observability defines a runtime performance profile. Three senses need a decision, not a declaration, so it is recorded as open rather than forced. Eleven boundary reviews are added beside the artifacts they describe, in the shape the identity model has used since INFO-WP-0021. The largest finding is that Core and the Information Space model restate eight provenance concepts in nearly identical words; Core owns them and Information Space imports. Label, Drift, Summary and Attribute are resolved by disambiguation rather than transfer. make check passes with 50 tests, clean validation, no stale generated assets. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 3588@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 24b80f66-e5a7-4e61-99fe-2d422e6d17da
2026-09-20 23:19:22 +02:00
| AgentExecutionEvidence | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AgentGeneratedPatch | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AgentReview | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Artifact | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ArtifactDigest | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ArtifactVersion | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Attestation | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Branch | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ChangeFailure | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CodeReview | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CodingAgentChange | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Commit | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ContainerImage | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DeliveryMetric | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DeploymentExecution | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DeploymentHealthSignal | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DeploymentManifest | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DeploymentPlan | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DeploymentRecord | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DeploymentVerification | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DevSecOpsEntity | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| EnvironmentPromotion | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| FeedbackLoop | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| GateDecision | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| HumanSupervisionReference | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| IaCModule | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Package | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Pipeline | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| PipelineDefinition | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| PipelineIdentity | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| PipelineJob | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| PipelineResult | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| PipelineRun | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| PipelineStage | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| PipelineStep | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| PolicyGate | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Promotion | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Provenance | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| PullRequest | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| QualityGate | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| RecoveryAction | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Release | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ReleaseApprovalReference | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ReleaseCandidate | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ReleaseNote | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ReleaseVersion | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Repository | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Rollback | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| RolloutStrategy | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Runner | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ScanResult | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ScanRun | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Signature | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Software Bill of Materials | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| SourceChange | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| SourceTag | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| SupplyChainEvidence | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TestResult | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TestRun | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TransparencyLogEntry | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| VEXReference | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| VerificationEvidence | `model/devsecops` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
Introduce shared evidence model and governance imports Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a070b5-4994-7271-bd8b-7c3dbcedec4b
2026-09-05 21:16:29 +02:00
| InfoTechCanon Evidence Model | `model/evidence` | `artifact_title` |
| Evidence | `model/evidence` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Evidence Source | `model/evidence` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Adjudication Outcome | `model/evidence` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Evidence strength | `model/evidence` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
Add validation indexes and generated views
2026-05-23 03:32:16 +02:00
| InfoTechCanon Governance Model | `model/governance` | `artifact_title` |
Declare concepts and review boundaries for the silent artifacts (T02) Twelve of the thirteen artifacts that declared nothing now declare what they define, together with the map-assigned concepts the Organization Model was missing and the Landscape seed concepts the extractor cannot see because they are listed rather than defined in prose. The ownership index grows from 164 entries to 750, undeclared prose definitions fall from 637 to 57, and there are no ownership conflicts. The 57 that remain are overlaps this round assigned to another owner: imports, each recorded in a boundary review. The kernel map declares nothing, deliberately, because it assigns concepts to owners rather than defining them. It is now the only silent artifact and the suite asserts that, so an artifact added without declarations fails. itc-org:Authority is declared, with Actor, Ownership, Membership, Role, Responsibility and Accountability, which SecurityCanon and the identity model already treat as organization-owned. The regression test that previously asserted the blind spot now asserts that the kernel map's assignment and the declaration agree. Profile is deliberately left undeclared. The kernel map assigns it to Core, the identity model owns it under accepted CUST-ADR-006, and Observability defines a runtime performance profile. Three senses need a decision, not a declaration, so it is recorded as open rather than forced. Eleven boundary reviews are added beside the artifacts they describe, in the shape the identity model has used since INFO-WP-0021. The largest finding is that Core and the Information Space model restate eight provenance concepts in nearly identical words; Core owns them and Information Space imports. Label, Drift, Summary and Attribute are resolved by disambiguation rather than transfer. make check passes with 50 tests, clean validation, no stale generated assets. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 3588@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 24b80f66-e5a7-4e61-99fe-2d422e6d17da
2026-09-20 23:19:22 +02:00
| Approval | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Assertion | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Assessment | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AssuranceCase | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AssuranceConclusion | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Audit | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CompensatingControl | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ComplianceRequirement | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Control | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ControlActivity | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ControlImplementation | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ControlObjective | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ControlResult | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ControlTest | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Decision | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DecisionRight | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Escalation | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| EvidenceBasis | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Exception | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Finding | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| GovernanceCycle | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| GovernanceEntity | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| GovernanceForum | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| GovernanceProcess | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| GovernanceScope | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| GovernanceSystem | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Guideline | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Impact | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Likelihood | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Nonconformity | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Obligation | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Policy | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Principle | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| RegulatoryReference | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Remediation | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Requirement | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Review | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Risk | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| RiskAcceptance | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| RiskSource | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| RiskTreatment | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Rule | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Waiver | `model/governance` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
Introduce identity model and reconcile upstream imports Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a070b5-4994-7271-bd8b-7c3dbcedec4b
2026-09-05 22:11:46 +02:00
| InfoTechCanon Identity Model | `model/identity` | `artifact_title` |
| Account | `model/identity` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Service Account | `model/identity` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Identity Record | `model/identity` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Identifier | `model/identity` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Scoped Identifier | `model/identity` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Credential | `model/identity` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Claim | `model/identity` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Profile | `model/identity` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Persona | `model/identity` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Scope | `model/identity` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Tenant | `model/identity` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Realm | `model/identity` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Relationship | `model/identity` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Affiliation Relationship | `model/identity` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Following Relationship | `model/identity` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Representation Relationship | `model/identity` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Delegation Relationship | `model/identity` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Administration Relationship | `model/identity` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Trust Relationship | `model/identity` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Synonymity Assertion | `model/identity` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Lifecycle State | `model/identity` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Assurance Level | `model/identity` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Pseudonymous Identifier | `model/identity` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
Add validation indexes and generated views
2026-05-23 03:32:16 +02:00
| InfoTechCanon Information Space Model | `model/information-space` | `artifact_title` |
Declare concepts and review boundaries for the silent artifacts (T02) Twelve of the thirteen artifacts that declared nothing now declare what they define, together with the map-assigned concepts the Organization Model was missing and the Landscape seed concepts the extractor cannot see because they are listed rather than defined in prose. The ownership index grows from 164 entries to 750, undeclared prose definitions fall from 637 to 57, and there are no ownership conflicts. The 57 that remain are overlaps this round assigned to another owner: imports, each recorded in a boundary review. The kernel map declares nothing, deliberately, because it assigns concepts to owners rather than defining them. It is now the only silent artifact and the suite asserts that, so an artifact added without declarations fails. itc-org:Authority is declared, with Actor, Ownership, Membership, Role, Responsibility and Accountability, which SecurityCanon and the identity model already treat as organization-owned. The regression test that previously asserted the blind spot now asserts that the kernel map's assignment and the declaration agree. Profile is deliberately left undeclared. The kernel map assigns it to Core, the identity model owns it under accepted CUST-ADR-006, and Observability defines a runtime performance profile. Three senses need a decision, not a declaration, so it is recorded as open rather than forced. Eleven boundary reviews are added beside the artifacts they describe, in the shape the identity model has used since INFO-WP-0021. The largest finding is that Core and the Information Space model restate eight provenance concepts in nearly identical words; Core owns them and Information Space imports. Label, Drift, Summary and Attribute are resolved by disambiguation rather than transfer. make check passes with 50 tests, clean validation, no stale generated assets. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 3588@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 24b80f66-e5a7-4e61-99fe-2d422e6d17da
2026-09-20 23:19:22 +02:00
| Anchor | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AssimilationReport | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Backlink | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Block | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| BrokenLink | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Chunk | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Citation | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Collection | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ConceptIndex | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ConceptPage | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ConflictingDefinition | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Corpus | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CrossReference | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DependencyReference | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Document | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DuplicateContent | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| EmbeddingRecord | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Excerpt | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| FrontMatter | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Generation | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| GraphView | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Heading | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Index | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| InformationSpace | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Infospace | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| KnowledgeArtifact | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| KnowledgeBase | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Link | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| LowRetrievalQuality | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| MapView | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| MappingDocument | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| MappingReference | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| MarkdownDocument | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| MetadataRecord | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| MissingMetadata | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| NavigationView | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| OrphanArtifact | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| PatternDocument | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ProfileDocument | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| RelationshipIndex | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| RepositorySpace | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| RetrievalContext | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| RetrievalEvaluation | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| RetrievalQuery | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| RetrievalResult | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| RetrievalUnit | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ReviewRecord | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Revision | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| SearchIndex | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Section | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Shard | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| SourceReference | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| StaleContent | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| StandardDocument | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Status | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Summary | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TopicIndex | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| UsePath | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| VectorIndex | `model/information-space` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
Add validation indexes and generated views
2026-05-23 03:32:16 +02:00
| InfoTechCanon Landscape Model | `model/landscape` | `artifact_title` |
Re-verify both extension boundaries against the enlarged index (T04) Neither boundary has an ownership conflict now that declarations cover the corpus, so the central claim of both acceptances holds. Name resolution is a different matter, and it had never been checked: both original reviews verified their import manifests by file hash, every hash matched, and that was recorded as evidence. A hash proves the reviewed file is the pinned file; it says nothing about whether the concept named in the manifest exists in it. SecurityCanon: five of twelve imports named concepts their pinned artifact does not define, corrected on that side to eleven imports. InterfaceCanon: twenty-one of twenty-five resolve exactly, and two of the four failures were this repository's omission — SoftwareSystem and SoftwareComponent are Landscape seed concepts that extraction cannot read and are now declared, making those pins correct. Interface and Endpoint resolve to the Network Model, which the accepted clarifications already treat as contextual rather than exact aliases; those pins are InterfaceCanon's to correct. Both boundary files carry the re-verification and its method limit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 3588@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 24b80f66-e5a7-4e61-99fe-2d422e6d17da
2026-09-20 23:27:47 +02:00
| SoftwareSystem | `model/landscape` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| SoftwareComponent | `model/landscape` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
Declare concepts and review boundaries for the silent artifacts (T02) Twelve of the thirteen artifacts that declared nothing now declare what they define, together with the map-assigned concepts the Organization Model was missing and the Landscape seed concepts the extractor cannot see because they are listed rather than defined in prose. The ownership index grows from 164 entries to 750, undeclared prose definitions fall from 637 to 57, and there are no ownership conflicts. The 57 that remain are overlaps this round assigned to another owner: imports, each recorded in a boundary review. The kernel map declares nothing, deliberately, because it assigns concepts to owners rather than defining them. It is now the only silent artifact and the suite asserts that, so an artifact added without declarations fails. itc-org:Authority is declared, with Actor, Ownership, Membership, Role, Responsibility and Accountability, which SecurityCanon and the identity model already treat as organization-owned. The regression test that previously asserted the blind spot now asserts that the kernel map's assignment and the declaration agree. Profile is deliberately left undeclared. The kernel map assigns it to Core, the identity model owns it under accepted CUST-ADR-006, and Observability defines a runtime performance profile. Three senses need a decision, not a declaration, so it is recorded as open rather than forced. Eleven boundary reviews are added beside the artifacts they describe, in the shape the identity model has used since INFO-WP-0021. The largest finding is that Core and the Information Space model restate eight provenance concepts in nearly identical words; Core owns them and Information Space imports. Label, Drift, Summary and Attribute are resolved by disambiguation rather than transfer. make check passes with 50 tests, clean validation, no stale generated assets. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 3588@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 24b80f66-e5a7-4e61-99fe-2d422e6d17da
2026-09-20 23:19:22 +02:00
| BusinessService | `model/landscape` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ApplicationService | `model/landscape` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TechnicalService | `model/landscape` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| RuntimeResource | `model/landscape` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Environment | `model/landscape` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Workload | `model/landscape` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| LandscapeClaim | `model/landscape` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| LandscapeEntity | `model/landscape` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| LandscapeEvidence | `model/landscape` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| LandscapeRelationship | `model/landscape` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| LandscapeSource | `model/landscape` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| LandscapeState | `model/landscape` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
Add validation indexes and generated views
2026-05-23 03:32:16 +02:00
| InfoTechCanon Network Model | `model/network` | `artifact_title` |
Declare concepts and review boundaries for the silent artifacts (T02) Twelve of the thirteen artifacts that declared nothing now declare what they define, together with the map-assigned concepts the Organization Model was missing and the Landscape seed concepts the extractor cannot see because they are listed rather than defined in prose. The ownership index grows from 164 entries to 750, undeclared prose definitions fall from 637 to 57, and there are no ownership conflicts. The 57 that remain are overlaps this round assigned to another owner: imports, each recorded in a boundary review. The kernel map declares nothing, deliberately, because it assigns concepts to owners rather than defining them. It is now the only silent artifact and the suite asserts that, so an artifact added without declarations fails. itc-org:Authority is declared, with Actor, Ownership, Membership, Role, Responsibility and Accountability, which SecurityCanon and the identity model already treat as organization-owned. The regression test that previously asserted the blind spot now asserts that the kernel map's assignment and the declaration agree. Profile is deliberately left undeclared. The kernel map assigns it to Core, the identity model owns it under accepted CUST-ADR-006, and Observability defines a runtime performance profile. Three senses need a decision, not a declaration, so it is recorded as open rather than forced. Eleven boundary reviews are added beside the artifacts they describe, in the shape the identity model has used since INFO-WP-0021. The largest finding is that Core and the Information Space model restate eight provenance concepts in nearly identical words; Core owns them and Information Space imports. Label, Drift, Summary and Attribute are resolved by disambiguation rather than transfer. make check passes with 50 tests, clean validation, no stale generated assets. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 3588@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 24b80f66-e5a7-4e61-99fe-2d422e6d17da
2026-09-20 23:19:22 +02:00
| ACL | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AddressFamily | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AllowedFlow | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AppliedNetworkState | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AssessedNetworkState | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AttackSurfaceReference | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Circuit | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ConnectivityService | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DNSRecord | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DNSZone | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DeclaredNetworkState | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DeniedFlow | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| EgressEndpoint | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Endpoint | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Firewall | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| FirewallRule | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Gateway | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| HistoricalNetworkState | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Hostname | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| IPAddress | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| IPAllocation | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| IngressEndpoint | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| IntendedNetworkState | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Interface | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| KubernetesNetworkPolicy | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| LoadBalancer | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ManagementEndpoint | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Microsegment | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| NAT | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| NetworkACL | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| NetworkConfiguration | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| NetworkDevice | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| NetworkDomain | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| NetworkEntity | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| NetworkFabric | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| NetworkFlow | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| NetworkIntent | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| NetworkNode | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| NetworkPolicy | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| NetworkRegion | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| NetworkSegment | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| NetworkSite | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| NetworkTenant | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| NetworkZone | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| NextHop | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ObservedFlow | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ObservedNetworkState | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| OverlayNetwork | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Path | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Peering | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Port | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Prefix | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| PrivateEndpoint | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Proxy | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| PublicEndpoint | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ReachabilityClaim | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ReachabilityTest | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ReconciliationResult | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Route | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| RouteTable | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Router | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| SecurityGroup | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| SecurityZone | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ServiceEndpoint | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ServiceMeshPolicy | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ServiceName | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Subnet | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Switch | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TerminationPoint | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TrafficPolicy | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TrustZoneReference | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| UnderlayNetwork | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| VLAN | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| VRF | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| WorkloadEndpoint | `model/network` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
Add validation indexes and generated views
2026-05-23 03:32:16 +02:00
| InfoTechCanon Observability Model | `model/observability` | `artifact_title` |
Declare concepts and review boundaries for the silent artifacts (T02) Twelve of the thirteen artifacts that declared nothing now declare what they define, together with the map-assigned concepts the Organization Model was missing and the Landscape seed concepts the extractor cannot see because they are listed rather than defined in prose. The ownership index grows from 164 entries to 750, undeclared prose definitions fall from 637 to 57, and there are no ownership conflicts. The 57 that remain are overlaps this round assigned to another owner: imports, each recorded in a boundary review. The kernel map declares nothing, deliberately, because it assigns concepts to owners rather than defining them. It is now the only silent artifact and the suite asserts that, so an artifact added without declarations fails. itc-org:Authority is declared, with Actor, Ownership, Membership, Role, Responsibility and Accountability, which SecurityCanon and the identity model already treat as organization-owned. The regression test that previously asserted the blind spot now asserts that the kernel map's assignment and the declaration agree. Profile is deliberately left undeclared. The kernel map assigns it to Core, the identity model owns it under accepted CUST-ADR-006, and Observability defines a runtime performance profile. Three senses need a decision, not a declaration, so it is recorded as open rather than forced. Eleven boundary reviews are added beside the artifacts they describe, in the shape the identity model has used since INFO-WP-0021. The largest finding is that Core and the Information Space model restate eight provenance concepts in nearly identical words; Core owns them and Information Space imports. Label, Drift, Summary and Attribute are resolved by disambiguation rather than transfer. make check passes with 50 tests, clean validation, no stale generated assets. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 3588@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 24b80f66-e5a7-4e61-99fe-2d422e6d17da
2026-09-20 23:19:22 +02:00
| Alert | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AlertCorrelation | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AlertRoute | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AlertRule | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AlertSuppression | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Annotation | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AvailabilityWindow | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Baggage | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| BurnRate | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Correlation | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Counter | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Dashboard | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ErrorBudget | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| EscalationReference | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Event | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| EventConsumer | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| EventCorrelationKey | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| EventEnvelope | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| EventSource | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| EventType | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Exemplar | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Gauge | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| HealthState | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Histogram | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Log | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| LogContext | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| LogLevel | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| LogRecord | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| LogStream | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Metric | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| MetricInstrument | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| MetricPoint | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Notification | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ObservabilityEntity | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ObservabilityEvidence | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ObservedIncident | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ObservedResource | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| OperationalView | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| PerformanceProfile | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| PostIncidentObservation | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ProfilingSample | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Query | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| QueryResult | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ResourceAttribute | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ResourceProfile | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| RootCauseHypothesis | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Runbook | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| SLAReference | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Service Level Indicator | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Service Level Objective | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Signal | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| SignalSource | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Snapshot | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Span | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| SpanEvent | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| SpanLink | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Telemetry | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TelemetryPipeline | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TelemetrySource | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TimeSeries | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Timeline | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Trace | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TraceContext | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TraceSample | `model/observability` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
Add validation indexes and generated views
2026-05-23 03:32:16 +02:00
| InfoTechCanon Organization Model | `model/organization` | `artifact_title` |
Resolve the two senses of Authority and declare the unowned remainder (T05, T07) R-3 is resolved by disambiguation without a rename. CARING section 10.7 now says its Authority exposure mode names a demanding party rather than a right, links to ITC-ORG section 10.17, and notes that such an Authority holds no organizational authority over the system it compels. ITC-ORG carries the reciprocal sentence and records that SecurityCanon's AuthMode qualifies the exercise of the right rather than redefining it. The seventeen concepts no artifact declared are now declared: eleven to the Organization Model, four to CARING and two to the Capability Model. Capacity in the Organization Model and Capacity behaviour in the Capability Model are two concepts, not one, and neither moves. Two of CARING's four turned out not to be new concepts at all but the prose spellings of CaringCapabilityProfile and CaringDerivedCapability; both spellings are declared to the same owner so the name a reader meets resolves. Effective Access and Declared Access were genuinely undeclared. Three boundary reviews are added for organization, caring and capability, bringing the count to fourteen. The concept_defined_without_owner warning is at zero, and the test that asserted it fires now proves it on a modified corpus instead of on the live one. make check passes with 54 tests, clean validation, no warnings, no stale assets. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 3588@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 24b80f66-e5a7-4e61-99fe-2d422e6d17da
2026-09-20 23:32:57 +02:00
| Assignment | `model/organization` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Availability | `model/organization` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Capacity | `model/organization` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CollectiveActor | `model/organization` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Competence | `model/organization` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Group | `model/organization` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| OrganizationEntity | `model/organization` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| OrganizationalCapability | `model/organization` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Post | `model/organization` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ReportingLine | `model/organization` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Skill | `model/organization` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
Declare concepts and review boundaries for the silent artifacts (T02) Twelve of the thirteen artifacts that declared nothing now declare what they define, together with the map-assigned concepts the Organization Model was missing and the Landscape seed concepts the extractor cannot see because they are listed rather than defined in prose. The ownership index grows from 164 entries to 750, undeclared prose definitions fall from 637 to 57, and there are no ownership conflicts. The 57 that remain are overlaps this round assigned to another owner: imports, each recorded in a boundary review. The kernel map declares nothing, deliberately, because it assigns concepts to owners rather than defining them. It is now the only silent artifact and the suite asserts that, so an artifact added without declarations fails. itc-org:Authority is declared, with Actor, Ownership, Membership, Role, Responsibility and Accountability, which SecurityCanon and the identity model already treat as organization-owned. The regression test that previously asserted the blind spot now asserts that the kernel map's assignment and the declaration agree. Profile is deliberately left undeclared. The kernel map assigns it to Core, the identity model owns it under accepted CUST-ADR-006, and Observability defines a runtime performance profile. Three senses need a decision, not a declaration, so it is recorded as open rather than forced. Eleven boundary reviews are added beside the artifacts they describe, in the shape the identity model has used since INFO-WP-0021. The largest finding is that Core and the Information Space model restate eight provenance concepts in nearly identical words; Core owns them and Information Space imports. Label, Drift, Summary and Attribute are resolved by disambiguation rather than transfer. make check passes with 50 tests, clean validation, no stale generated assets. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 3588@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 24b80f66-e5a7-4e61-99fe-2d422e6d17da
2026-09-20 23:19:22 +02:00
| Accountability | `model/organization` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Actor | `model/organization` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Agent | `model/organization` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Authority | `model/organization` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Membership | `model/organization` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Organization | `model/organization` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| OrganizationalUnit | `model/organization` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Ownership | `model/organization` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Person | `model/organization` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Position | `model/organization` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Responsibility | `model/organization` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Role | `model/organization` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Stewardship | `model/organization` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Team | `model/organization` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
Extend organization model with distinct social collectives Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a070b5-4994-7271-bd8b-7c3dbcedec4b
2026-09-05 22:31:15 +02:00
| Community | `model/organization` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Household | `model/organization` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
Add purpose and demand model extension
2026-05-23 04:59:16 +02:00
| InfoTechCanon Purpose And Demand Model Extension | `model/purpose-demand-extension` | `artifact_title` |
| Purpose | `model/purpose-demand-extension` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ConsumerPurpose | `model/purpose-demand-extension` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| UseCase | `model/purpose-demand-extension` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DemandSignal | `model/purpose-demand-extension` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ConsumerNeed | `model/purpose-demand-extension` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ProducerCapability | `model/purpose-demand-extension` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| PurposeFit | `model/purpose-demand-extension` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ScopePressure | `model/purpose-demand-extension` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| EvolutionRequest | `model/purpose-demand-extension` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
Add validation indexes and generated views
2026-05-23 03:32:16 +02:00
| InfoTechCanon Security Model | `model/security` | `artifact_title` |
Declare concepts and review boundaries for the silent artifacts (T02) Twelve of the thirteen artifacts that declared nothing now declare what they define, together with the map-assigned concepts the Organization Model was missing and the Landscape seed concepts the extractor cannot see because they are listed rather than defined in prose. The ownership index grows from 164 entries to 750, undeclared prose definitions fall from 637 to 57, and there are no ownership conflicts. The 57 that remain are overlaps this round assigned to another owner: imports, each recorded in a boundary review. The kernel map declares nothing, deliberately, because it assigns concepts to owners rather than defining them. It is now the only silent artifact and the suite asserts that, so an artifact added without declarations fails. itc-org:Authority is declared, with Actor, Ownership, Membership, Role, Responsibility and Accountability, which SecurityCanon and the identity model already treat as organization-owned. The regression test that previously asserted the blind spot now asserts that the kernel map's assignment and the declaration agree. Profile is deliberately left undeclared. The kernel map assigns it to Core, the identity model owns it under accepted CUST-ADR-006, and Observability defines a runtime performance profile. Three senses need a decision, not a declaration, so it is recorded as open rather than forced. Eleven boundary reviews are added beside the artifacts they describe, in the shape the identity model has used since INFO-WP-0021. The largest finding is that Core and the Information Space model restate eight provenance concepts in nearly identical words; Core owns them and Information Space imports. Label, Drift, Summary and Attribute are resolved by disambiguation rather than transfer. make check passes with 50 tests, clean validation, no stale generated assets. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 3588@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 24b80f66-e5a7-4e61-99fe-2d422e6d17da
2026-09-20 23:19:22 +02:00
| AttackImpact | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AttackPath | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AttackPattern | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AttackPrecondition | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AttackStep | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AttackTechnique | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| BlastRadius | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ChokePoint | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CompensatingMeasure | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Containment | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DataSecurityFinding | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Detection | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DetectionCoverage | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DetectionRule | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Eradication | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Exploit | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ExploitLikelihood | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Exploitability | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Exposure | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ExposureFinding | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| HardeningMeasure | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| IdentityFinding | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Investigation | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| LessonLearned | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Misconfiguration | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| MisconfigurationFinding | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Mitigation | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| PenTestFinding | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ProtectedAssetReference | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Recovery | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| SecurityAssessment | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| SecurityBoundary | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| SecurityDomain | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| SecurityEntity | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| SecurityEvidence | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| SecurityFinding | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| SecurityIncident | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| SecurityMeasure | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| SecurityPosture | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| SecurityPostureScore | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| SecurityReview | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| SecuritySignal | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Severity | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| SupplyChainFinding | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Tactic | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Threat | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ThreatActor | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ThreatEvent | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Vulnerability | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| VulnerabilityFinding | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Weakness | `model/security` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
Add validation indexes and generated views
2026-05-23 03:32:16 +02:00
| InfoTechCanon Task Model | `model/task` | `artifact_title` |
Declare concepts and review boundaries for the silent artifacts (T02) Twelve of the thirteen artifacts that declared nothing now declare what they define, together with the map-assigned concepts the Organization Model was missing and the Landscape seed concepts the extractor cannot see because they are listed rather than defined in prose. The ownership index grows from 164 entries to 750, undeclared prose definitions fall from 637 to 57, and there are no ownership conflicts. The 57 that remain are overlaps this round assigned to another owner: imports, each recorded in a boundary review. The kernel map declares nothing, deliberately, because it assigns concepts to owners rather than defining them. It is now the only silent artifact and the suite asserts that, so an artifact added without declarations fails. itc-org:Authority is declared, with Actor, Ownership, Membership, Role, Responsibility and Accountability, which SecurityCanon and the identity model already treat as organization-owned. The regression test that previously asserted the blind spot now asserts that the kernel map's assignment and the declaration agree. Profile is deliberately left undeclared. The kernel map assigns it to Core, the identity model owns it under accepted CUST-ADR-006, and Observability defines a runtime performance profile. Three senses need a decision, not a declaration, so it is recorded as open rather than forced. Eleven boundary reviews are added beside the artifacts they describe, in the shape the identity model has used since INFO-WP-0021. The largest finding is that Core and the Information Space model restate eight provenance concepts in nearly identical words; Core owns them and Information Space imports. Label, Drift, Summary and Attribute are resolved by disambiguation rather than transfer. make check passes with 50 tests, clean validation, no stale generated assets. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 3588@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 24b80f66-e5a7-4e61-99fe-2d422e6d17da
2026-09-20 23:19:22 +02:00
| AcceptanceCriteria | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Action | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Actionability | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ApprovalTask | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AssignmentReference | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Backlog | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Blocker | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Bug | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ChangeTask | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Commitment | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CompletionEvidence | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Complexity | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Deadline | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DecisionTask | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DefinitionOfDone | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DefinitionOfReady | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Deliverable | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Dependency | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DueDate | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| EffortEstimate | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Epic | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Experiment | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Exploration | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Feature | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Importance | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| IncidentTask | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Issue | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Milestone | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Move | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| NextAction | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Option | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Outcome | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Priority | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ProblemTask | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Reachability | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Readiness | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| RemediationTask | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Request | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ReviewTask | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Step | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Story | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Task | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TaskEntity | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Transition | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Urgency | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Value | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| WIPLimit | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| WaitingFor | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| WorkItem | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| WorkPackage | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Workflow | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| WorkflowState | `model/task` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
Add purpose and demand model extension
2026-05-23 04:59:16 +02:00
| Intent Scope Purposes Pattern | `pattern/intent-scope-purposes` | `artifact_title` |
| IntentScopePurposePattern | `pattern/intent-scope-purposes` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
feat(ITC-WP-0017): establish AgenticDrivesFunctional pattern Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-5.6-sol Assistant-Session: 01a025c2-407a-7a32-b40a-f37a52f03f62
2026-08-22 18:54:01 +02:00
| AgenticDrivesFunctional | `practice-pattern/agentic-drives-functional` | `artifact_title` |
| AgenticDrivesFunctional | `practice-pattern/agentic-drives-functional` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| AgenticFallback | `practice-pattern/agentic-drives-functional` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DemandSignature | `practice-pattern/agentic-drives-functional` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| FunctionalInterfaceCandidate | `practice-pattern/agentic-drives-functional` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
feat(ITC-WP-0016): establish PracticePattern language Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-5.6-sol Assistant-Session: 01a025c2-407a-7a32-b40a-f37a52f03f62
2026-08-21 22:22:46 +02:00
| InterfaceDeprecationStrangler | `practice-pattern/interface-deprecation-strangler` | `artifact_title` |
Assimilate ITCC v0.1 as Capability Model; canon 0.2.0 Define the intake and assimilation practice (incoming/ drop zone -> frozen source snapshot -> Minimal Assimilation Profile -> disposition gate -> canon transformation -> versioned change notes) and run it on the first inputs. - infospace/assimilation/intake-and-assimilation-practice.md, incoming/README.md - assimilation/it-capability-canon: frozen source, comparison matrix, 26 mappings, 8 proposed changes, 7 open questions, decision record (adapt) - new model ITC-CAP with 41-capability machine-readable catalog, anchored to owning canon models; CILM rejected, Profile renamed, Provision made explicit - registered in canon.yaml / artifacts index / infospace.yaml; regenerated briefs, indexes, views; canon version 0.1.0-scaffold -> 0.2.0 + CHANGELOG - ITC-WP-0014 for promotion work; ITC-WP-0013 added to the workplan registry make validate: ok (65 artifacts, 0 errors/warnings). make test: 22 passed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-14 20:54:32 +02:00
| Intake and Assimilation Practice | `practice/intake-and-assimilation` | `artifact_title` |
Add small SaaS profile proof
2026-05-23 04:26:28 +02:00
| Small SaaS System Profile | `profile/small-saas` | `artifact_title` |
Add consumer alignment review kit
2026-05-23 07:23:48 +02:00
| Canon Consumer Alignment Review Kit | `review-kit/alignment` | `artifact_title` |
| Canon Model And Standard Selection Guide | `review-kit/alignment/model-selection-guide` | `artifact_title` |
| Consumer Alignment Review Schema | `review-kit/alignment/schema` | `artifact_title` |
| Canon Consumer Alignment Scorecard | `review-kit/alignment/scorecard` | `artifact_title` |
| Canon Consumer Alignment Review Workflow | `review-kit/alignment/workflow` | `artifact_title` |
| Consumer Alignment Workplan Template | `review-kit/alignment/workplan-template` | `artifact_title` |
feat(ITC-WP-0016): establish PracticePattern language Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-5.6-sol Assistant-Session: 01a025c2-407a-7a32-b40a-f37a52f03f62
2026-08-21 22:22:46 +02:00
| PracticePattern Scheme | `scheme/practice-pattern` | `artifact_title` |
| PracticePattern | `scheme/practice-pattern` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| PatternLanguage | `scheme/practice-pattern` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
Implement canon conformance and maintenance optimizations Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a06e82-3e08-7042-a79d-438ac6eed8db
2026-09-05 00:50:09 +02:00
| Small SaaS Production Capability Requirements | `small-saas/capability-requirements/production` | `artifact_title` |
Add small SaaS profile proof
2026-05-23 04:26:28 +02:00
| Namespace Per Tenant Control | `small-saas/control/namespace-per-tenant` | `artifact_title` |
| Subscription Ledger Dataset | `small-saas/dataset/subscription-ledger` | `artifact_title` |
| Production Deployment | `small-saas/deployment/production` | `artifact_title` |
| Access Review 2026-05 | `small-saas/evidence/access-review-2026-05` | `artifact_title` |
| Cross-Tenant Access Attempt | `small-saas/incident/cross-tenant-access-attempt` | `artifact_title` |
| Tenant Isolation Policy | `small-saas/policy/tenant-isolation` | `artifact_title` |
| Billing Portal Service | `small-saas/service/billing-portal` | `artifact_title` |
| Small SaaS Billing System | `small-saas/system/billing-system` | `artifact_title` |
| Onboard Tenant | `small-saas/task/onboard-tenant` | `artifact_title` |
| Platform Team | `small-saas/team/platform` | `artifact_title` |
| Acme Tenant | `small-saas/tenant/acme` | `artifact_title` |
| Globex Tenant | `small-saas/tenant/globex` | `artifact_title` |
| Ada Admin | `small-saas/user/ada-admin` | `artifact_title` |
Add validation indexes and generated views
2026-05-23 03:32:16 +02:00
| InfoTechCanon CARING Access Governance Standard | `standard/caring` | `artifact_title` |
Resolve the two senses of Authority and declare the unowned remainder (T05, T07) R-3 is resolved by disambiguation without a rename. CARING section 10.7 now says its Authority exposure mode names a demanding party rather than a right, links to ITC-ORG section 10.17, and notes that such an Authority holds no organizational authority over the system it compels. ITC-ORG carries the reciprocal sentence and records that SecurityCanon's AuthMode qualifies the exercise of the right rather than redefining it. The seventeen concepts no artifact declared are now declared: eleven to the Organization Model, four to CARING and two to the Capability Model. Capacity in the Organization Model and Capacity behaviour in the Capability Model are two concepts, not one, and neither moves. Two of CARING's four turned out not to be new concepts at all but the prose spellings of CaringCapabilityProfile and CaringDerivedCapability; both spellings are declared to the same owner so the name a reader meets resolves. Effective Access and Declared Access were genuinely undeclared. Three boundary reviews are added for organization, caring and capability, bringing the count to fourteen. The concept_defined_without_owner warning is at zero, and the test that asserted it fires now proves it on a modified corpus instead of on the live one. make check passes with 54 tests, clean validation, no warnings, no stale assets. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 3588@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 24b80f66-e5a7-4e61-99fe-2d422e6d17da
2026-09-20 23:32:57 +02:00
| Declared Access | `standard/caring` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Effective Access | `standard/caring` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Capability Profile | `standard/caring` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Derived Capability | `standard/caring` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
Add validation indexes and generated views
2026-05-23 03:32:16 +02:00
| CARINGAccessDescriptor | `standard/caring` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CARINGCanonicalRole | `standard/caring` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CARINGOrganizationRelation | `standard/caring` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CARINGPlane | `standard/caring` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CARINGCapabilityProfile | `standard/caring` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CARINGExposureMode | `standard/caring` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CARINGExposureEvent | `standard/caring` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CARINGDeclaredAccessMap | `standard/caring` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CARINGEffectiveAccessMap | `standard/caring` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CARINGDerivedCapability | `standard/caring` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CARINGInducedAccess | `standard/caring` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CARINGRestrictionPrecedence | `standard/caring` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CARINGAnalysisFitnessTest | `standard/caring` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CARINGAnalysisProcedure | `standard/caring` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| CARINGRedesignProcedure | `standard/caring` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
Implement canon conformance and maintenance optimizations Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a06e82-3e08-7042-a79d-438ac6eed8db
2026-09-05 00:50:09 +02:00
| InfoTechCanon Emission Cadence Standard | `standard/emission-cadence` | `artifact_title` |
| EmissionCadenceDeclaration | `standard/emission-cadence` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| EmissionCadenceForm | `standard/emission-cadence` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ExpectedRateCadence | `standard/emission-cadence` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| HeartbeatCadence | `standard/emission-cadence` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ReconciliationCadence | `standard/emission-cadence` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
ITC-WP-0012: integrate Repository Layout Standard Register the InfoTechCanon Repository Layout Standard as a domain standard (itc-repo-layout), processed from demand through the canon's Purpose/Demand intake without collapsing existing model concepts. - Register standard in artifacts/index.yaml, canon.yaml, infospace.yaml; regenerate indexes, views, briefs, tree, and validation (validate green). - T04: add reconciliation.yaml (partial/as-is dogfooding, declared core conformance, recorded tensions); resolve the demand by moving it out of demand/ to the evaluation pack as source-demand.md and removing demand/. - T05: add consumer-adoption-brief.md for downstream repos. - Update test artifact/standard counts (60->61, standards 2->3). - Mark T03/T04/T05 done; workplan and registry status -> finished. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-13 14:25:54 +02:00
| InfoTechCanon Repository Layout Standard | `standard/repository-layout` | `artifact_title` |
| CanonicalRepositoryLayout | `standard/repository-layout` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| RepositoryDocumentationDirectory | `standard/repository-layout` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| LayoutConformanceLevel | `standard/repository-layout` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| ScopeIntentOperatingMode | `standard/repository-layout` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
Add validation indexes and generated views
2026-05-23 03:32:16 +02:00
| InfoTechCanon Tagging Standard | `standard/tagging` | `artifact_title` |
Declare concepts and review boundaries for the silent artifacts (T02) Twelve of the thirteen artifacts that declared nothing now declare what they define, together with the map-assigned concepts the Organization Model was missing and the Landscape seed concepts the extractor cannot see because they are listed rather than defined in prose. The ownership index grows from 164 entries to 750, undeclared prose definitions fall from 637 to 57, and there are no ownership conflicts. The 57 that remain are overlaps this round assigned to another owner: imports, each recorded in a boundary review. The kernel map declares nothing, deliberately, because it assigns concepts to owners rather than defining them. It is now the only silent artifact and the suite asserts that, so an artifact added without declarations fails. itc-org:Authority is declared, with Actor, Ownership, Membership, Role, Responsibility and Accountability, which SecurityCanon and the identity model already treat as organization-owned. The regression test that previously asserted the blind spot now asserts that the kernel map's assignment and the declaration agree. Profile is deliberately left undeclared. The kernel map assigns it to Core, the identity model owns it under accepted CUST-ADR-006, and Observability defines a runtime performance profile. Three senses need a decision, not a declaration, so it is recorded as open rather than forced. Eleven boundary reviews are added beside the artifacts they describe, in the shape the identity model has used since INFO-WP-0021. The largest finding is that Core and the Information Space model restate eight provenance concepts in nearly identical words; Core owns them and Information Space imports. Label, Drift, Summary and Attribute are resolved by disambiguation rather than transfer. make check passes with 50 tests, clean validation, no stale generated assets. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 3588@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 24b80f66-e5a7-4e61-99fe-2d422e6d17da
2026-09-20 23:19:22 +02:00
| ControlledTag | `standard/tagging` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| DeprecatedTag | `standard/tagging` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| EmergentTag | `standard/tagging` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| OverTaggedEntity | `standard/tagging` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| Tag | `standard/tagging` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TagAlias | `standard/tagging` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TagAssignment | `standard/tagging` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TagCategory | `standard/tagging` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TagConflict | `standard/tagging` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TagDefinition | `standard/tagging` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TagDrift | `standard/tagging` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TagKey | `standard/tagging` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TagMapping | `standard/tagging` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TagNamespace | `standard/tagging` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TagProfile | `standard/tagging` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TagQuery | `standard/tagging` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TagRule | `standard/tagging` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TagScheme | `standard/tagging` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TagSelector | `standard/tagging` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TagSet | `standard/tagging` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TagValue | `standard/tagging` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TagView | `standard/tagging` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| TaggingEntity | `standard/tagging` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
| UntaggedEntity | `standard/tagging` | `frontmatter.owned_concepts` |
Add validation indexes and generated views
2026-05-23 03:32:16 +02:00
## Duplicate Candidates
feat(ITC-WP-0017): establish AgenticDrivesFunctional pattern Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-5.6-sol Assistant-Session: 01a025c2-407a-7a32-b40a-f37a52f03f62
2026-08-22 18:54:01 +02:00
- `agenticdrivesfunctional`
Add validation indexes and generated views
2026-05-23 03:32:16 +02:00
## Ownership Conflicts
No ownership conflicts detected.
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink