repo.work.create_intake ITC-IN-0001

correlation_id: d5052143-94f3-49e8-8cd5-0a0a135b8473
reason: Request own-voice layer declaration under §11
source: repo-manager

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 2564823@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 2a7ed827-4928-4b9f-8613-9135c9cadfe9

intakes/intakes.md

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+# Intake records
+
+## ITC-IN-0001 — Declaration requested: state this repository's layer in INTENT.md (security layer model §11)
+
+```yaml
+id: ITC-IN-0001
+kind: intake
+title: 'Declaration requested: state this repository''s layer in INTENT.md (security
+  layer model §11)'
+status: open
+origin: cross-repo
+origin_ref: net-kingdom security-layer-model_v0.4 §11
+priority: low
+owner: info-tech-canon
+requested_by: gate-house
+proposed_layer: Taxonomy
+description: 'A conformance sweep on 2026-08-28 found this repository has no layer
+  declaration of its own. It carries a layering review note gate-house wrote into
+  the top of its INTENT.md on 2026-08-24, and that note names a layer — but the words
+  are gate-house''s, sitting above a line admitting the body is unadapted. Section
+  11 has since been amended to say so explicitly: a layer stated about a repository
+  by another repository is not a declaration; only the repository''s own file, in
+  its own voice, conforms. Seven of fifteen estate-authored repositories have declared;
+  this is one of the eight that have not, and the standard does not claim adoption
+  on the basis of notes gate-house wrote. REQUESTED: state the layer in INTENT.md
+  in your own voice, or contest it. PROPOSED LAYER: Taxonomy. Cross-cutting semantic
+  contracts for the whole ecosystem; NetKingdom-specific security architecture is
+  net-kingdom canon''s. The boundary between the two canons is worth stating in your
+  own words. Contesting is a real option and costs nothing — the three repositories
+  that reviewed this model each returned a correction, two of which changed the standard.
+  If the proposed layer is wrong for what this repository actually does, that is more
+  useful to us than a label added to close a checkbox. Standard: net-kingdom/canon/standards/security-layer-model_v0.4.md.'
+created: '2026-08-28T21:01:51.123381Z'
+updated: '2026-08-28T21:01:51.123381Z'
+```