Bind the CARING Scope dimension to one definition (R-1)
The SecurityCanon boundary review recorded a residual: CARING and ITC-ACCESS hold two definitions of Scope, with ITC-ACCESS named owner. Reading the corpus corrects both halves. ITC-IDENT section 2.10 owns Scope as the general boundary within which identifiers, meanings, relationships, accounts, policies or lifecycle states are valid, and ITC-ACCESS section 11.8 ResourceScope already declares itself a refinement of that general identity Scope rather than a competing definition. The second use the residual was reaching for is CARING section 21, which presented a dimension named Scope with a ladder from Ecosystem to Field without saying what the dimension ranges over. It now states that it ranges over ITC-IDENT Scope instances, that the ladder is the canonical value set rather than a second definition, and that ResourceScope refines the same concept for resource boundaries. No concept is renamed, moved or removed and no ladder value changes, so the corpus is unchanged in shape; make check passes with 46 tests, clean validation and a passing small-saas profile. The correction is carried back to the SecurityCanon placement record and imports.json, where Scope now imports from the identity model. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 3588@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 24b80f66-e5a7-4e61-99fe-2d422e6d17da
This commit is contained in:
parent
d61ec8adf6
commit
209bb5a9c4
2 changed files with 53 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -1755,6 +1755,14 @@ Scope defines where the role applies.
|
|||
|
||||
Scope prevents canonical roles from exploding into countless local variants.
|
||||
|
||||
This dimension does not define Scope. It ranges over instances of
|
||||
[ITC-IDENT Scope](../../models/identity/InfoTechCanonIdentityModel.md) section 2.10,
|
||||
the general boundary within which identifiers, meanings, relationships, accounts,
|
||||
policies or lifecycle states are valid. The ladder below is the canonical value
|
||||
set CARING uses for that dimension, not a second definition of the concept. Where
|
||||
access applies to a resource boundary specifically, ITC-ACCESS section 11.8
|
||||
ResourceScope refines the same concept.
|
||||
|
||||
Canonical scope ladder:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue