Register limited Family concept-area seed

Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra
Assistant-Session: 01a070b5-4994-7271-bd8b-7c3dbcedec4b

infospace/concepts/family/FamilySeed.md

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+---
+id: family-area
+title: Family concept-area seed
+type: concept-area-seed
+status: seed
+content_status: seeded-not-authored
+owned_concepts:
+  - Family
+authority: CUST-ADR-006 R6
+workplan: INFO-WP-0023
+created: "2026-09-05"
+---
+
+# Family — concept-area seed
+
+This seed reserves the separately owned Family concept area under accepted
+CUST-ADR-006 R6. It is not an authored model, schema, taxonomy, or legal
+determination. Further modeling requires a named consumer demand signal.
+
+## Distinguishing structure
+
+Family concerns kinship, guardianship, dependency, care, and legal, biological
+and social parenthood. These relationships can change over time, coexist,
+diverge, or be subject to interpretation. This seed names the modeling questions;
+it does not settle their definitions or prescribe a universal family structure.
+
+Family is not one more CollectiveActor. It is distinct from the domestic
+arrangements represented by [Household in ITC-ORG](../../models/organization/InfoTechCanonOrganizationModel.md).
+A household and family relationships may intersect without being interchangeable.
+No Family subtype is added to the organization or identity models.
+
+## Privacy sensitivity
+
+The donor glossary flags the combined Family Or Household entry as
+privacy-sensitive and says it “may have legal implications outside the canon's
+scope.” The Family seed retains that concern. Kinship, care, dependency and
+parenthood assertions can concern multiple people and contested or sensitive
+circumstances. This document contains no personal records and does not establish
+who may record, disclose, verify or act on such assertions.
+
+## Open modeling questions
+
+- Which concrete consumer purpose requires Family semantics, beyond household,
+  membership or contact records already modeled elsewhere?
+- How should kinship, care, dependency and guardianship remain distinct without
+  forcing them into a single relationship or collective-actor structure?
+- How should legal, biological and social parenthood coexist when they differ?
+- How should a future model represent change over time, different viewpoints,
+  uncertainty and contested assertions without deciding them by default?
+- What source, evidence, scope and jurisdiction context would each assertion
+  require, and which determinations belong to an external authority?
+- What information is necessary for the named purpose, whose interests are
+  affected, and what privacy and disclosure constraints must the consumer supply?
+
+These questions are intentionally unanswered. There are no relationship type
+codes, cardinalities, lifecycle rules, authorization rules or implementation
+requirements in this seed.
+
+## Provenance and continuation
+
+The [federation ledger](../../../../prj-canon-federation/ledger/README.md) splits
+the original Family Or Household glossary entry: Household goes to itc-org under
+T12; Family is reserved here under T13. The donor revision remains
+`4bb474970b73d500da03b6482e84e6c256146b79`. Original research is unchanged.
+
+CFED-WP-0001-T07 owns research disposition, T08 owns interface cards, and T10 owns
+any demand-backed residual handoff before project closure. There is no approved
+Family model implementation or consumer adoption commitment.