Resolve the two senses of Authority and declare the unowned remainder (T05, T07)
R-3 is resolved by disambiguation without a rename. CARING section 10.7 now says its Authority exposure mode names a demanding party rather than a right, links to ITC-ORG section 10.17, and notes that such an Authority holds no organizational authority over the system it compels. ITC-ORG carries the reciprocal sentence and records that SecurityCanon's AuthMode qualifies the exercise of the right rather than redefining it. The seventeen concepts no artifact declared are now declared: eleven to the Organization Model, four to CARING and two to the Capability Model. Capacity in the Organization Model and Capacity behaviour in the Capability Model are two concepts, not one, and neither moves. Two of CARING's four turned out not to be new concepts at all but the prose spellings of CaringCapabilityProfile and CaringDerivedCapability; both spellings are declared to the same owner so the name a reader meets resolves. Effective Access and Declared Access were genuinely undeclared. Three boundary reviews are added for organization, caring and capability, bringing the count to fourteen. The concept_defined_without_owner warning is at zero, and the test that asserted it fires now proves it on a modified corpus instead of on the live one. make check passes with 54 tests, clean validation, no warnings, no stale assets. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 3588@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 24b80f66-e5a7-4e61-99fe-2d422e6d17da
This commit is contained in:
parent
4a35bfe489
commit
5f652d200f
18 changed files with 326 additions and 17 deletions
|
|
@ -7,6 +7,17 @@ version: RC1-seed
|
|||
# Incremental machine-readable ownership for the social extension; existing
|
||||
# organization concepts retain their definitions and ownership declarations below.
|
||||
owned_concepts:
|
||||
- Assignment
|
||||
- Availability
|
||||
- Capacity
|
||||
- CollectiveActor
|
||||
- Competence
|
||||
- Group
|
||||
- OrganizationEntity
|
||||
- OrganizationalCapability
|
||||
- Post
|
||||
- ReportingLine
|
||||
- Skill
|
||||
- Accountability
|
||||
- Actor
|
||||
- Agent
|
||||
|
|
@ -852,6 +863,12 @@ Profiles MAY require exactly one accountable actor per scope, but the core model
|
|||
|
||||
**Authority** is the recognized right to make decisions, allocate resources, approve changes, enforce rules, or direct action within a scope.
|
||||
|
||||
This is the concept SecurityCanon's Auth Mode qualifies: an auth mode describes
|
||||
the relationship in which this right is exercised, not the right itself. It is
|
||||
distinct from the CARING section 10.7 Authority exposure mode, which names an
|
||||
external body compelling disclosure rather than a right held within the
|
||||
organization.
|
||||
|
||||
Subtypes:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue