coulomb/info-tech-canon
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Recheck the adoption gate and verify it is ready (INFO-WP-0019-T06)
All checks were successful
CI Smoke / host-smoke (push) Successful in 0s
Details
CI Smoke / container-smoke (push) Successful in 2s
Details

Browse source 
No change in the evidence: feedback/ holds only the two 2026-08-15
resource-control reports, incoming/ only its README, and no inbox message is an
emission-cadence declaration. The sole declaration in the repository is still
the worked example, which the standard states is not source-owned.

What this repository owes the gate was re-tested rather than assumed.
emission-review validates an arbitrary source-owned declaration and reports
operational_truth_assessed false, so a submission cannot be read as observed
behaviour, and export-emission-contract produces a bundle whose manifest carries
the gate in words at digest 972c0b6701d1693f, which a source owner can pin to
today.

The blocker is not readiness but that no external source owner has been asked.
The contract came from the King's Guard taxonomy with evidence classes owned by
NetKingdom, which makes netkingdom the obvious first source owner and a second
one that must be independent of it. Soliciting them is an outward action this
workplan does not authorize, so T06 stays waiting on that decision.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 3588@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 24b80f66-e5a7-4e61-99fe-2d422e6d17da
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-09-20 23:59:17 +02:00
parent 30cf417a18
commit 9de170ecf9
1 changed files with 26 additions and 0 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

26
workplans/INFO-WP-0019-conformance-and-maintenance.md
View file

@ -110,6 +110,32 @@ capability reports. Neither supplies independent emission-cadence declarations
or the required pinned consumer results. T06 remains waiting; boundary review
is handled separately in INFO-WP-0026.
2026-09-20 recheck: no change in the evidence, and the gate is verified ready.
`feedback/` still holds only the two 2026-08-15 resource-control capability
reports. `incoming/` holds only its README. The inbox carries eleven messages,
the most recent a 2026-06-27 concept contribution from ops-warden; none is an
emission-cadence declaration. The only declaration in the repository remains
`standards/emission-cadence/examples/qonto-assistant.yaml`, which the standard
itself states is not the source-owned declaration and makes no claim about live
emission.
What this repository owes the gate is in place and was re-tested rather than
assumed. `emission-review` validates an arbitrary source-owned declaration
against the named schema and reports `operational_truth_assessed: false`, so a
submission cannot be mistaken for observed behaviour.
`export-emission-contract` produces a content-addressed bundle whose manifest
carries the gate in words — "Two independent source-owned implementations
required; example does not count" — at digest `972c0b6701d1693f`. A source owner
can pin to that digest today.
The blocker is therefore not readiness. It is that no external source owner has
been asked. The contract came from the King's Guard taxonomy and the evidence
classes remain owned by NetKingdom, which makes `netkingdom` the obvious first
source owner; a second must be independent of it. Asking them is an outward
action this workplan does not authorize, so T06 stays `wait` until the operator
decides whether to solicit declarations, and from whom.
## Implementation notes
T01–T04 implemented in `contracts.py`, `maintenance.py`, `paths.py`, CLI,