import-review takes any partner manifest and returns, per concept, whether the
name resolves in the ownership index and to which artifact, and per entry
whether the pinned SHA-256 matches the blob at the declared source commit. Both
run in one pass so neither can be recorded without the other, which is the
failure this workplan exists to prevent. It exits non-zero on a finding, reads
JSON or YAML, needs no partner checkout, and carries its own limit: resolution
proves a name exists and names one owner, nothing more.
Accepted manifests are registered under infospace/interfaces/manifests/ as
provenance-preserving copies owned by the partner, with the partner revision and
retrieval date recorded. Editing a copy to make a check pass is forbidden in the
file itself. Validation re-resolves them and reports drift as
federation_import_drift, a warning naming the partner rather than an error,
because a stale partner pin is not this repository's file to fix.
The review kit gains an extension-boundary-review template requiring hash count,
resolution count and conflict count as three separate lines, and an operating
rule saying one is never evidence of another. Both boundary files carry the
standing-check result.
Verified live: security-canon resolves 11 of 11, interface-canon 23 of 25 with
the two known Interface and Endpoint pins. make check passes with 58 tests,
clean validation and those two warnings.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 3588@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 24b80f66-e5a7-4e61-99fe-2d422e6d17da
R-3 is resolved by disambiguation without a rename. CARING section 10.7 now says
its Authority exposure mode names a demanding party rather than a right, links to
ITC-ORG section 10.17, and notes that such an Authority holds no organizational
authority over the system it compels. ITC-ORG carries the reciprocal sentence and
records that SecurityCanon's AuthMode qualifies the exercise of the right rather
than redefining it.
The seventeen concepts no artifact declared are now declared: eleven to the
Organization Model, four to CARING and two to the Capability Model. Capacity in
the Organization Model and Capacity behaviour in the Capability Model are two
concepts, not one, and neither moves. Two of CARING's four turned out not to be
new concepts at all but the prose spellings of CaringCapabilityProfile and
CaringDerivedCapability; both spellings are declared to the same owner so the
name a reader meets resolves. Effective Access and Declared Access were
genuinely undeclared.
Three boundary reviews are added for organization, caring and capability,
bringing the count to fourteen. The concept_defined_without_owner warning is at
zero, and the test that asserted it fires now proves it on a modified corpus
instead of on the live one.
make check passes with 54 tests, clean validation, no warnings, no stale assets.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 3588@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 24b80f66-e5a7-4e61-99fe-2d422e6d17da
Twelve of the thirteen artifacts that declared nothing now declare what they
define, together with the map-assigned concepts the Organization Model was
missing and the Landscape seed concepts the extractor cannot see because they
are listed rather than defined in prose. The ownership index grows from 164
entries to 750, undeclared prose definitions fall from 637 to 57, and there are
no ownership conflicts. The 57 that remain are overlaps this round assigned to
another owner: imports, each recorded in a boundary review.
The kernel map declares nothing, deliberately, because it assigns concepts to
owners rather than defining them. It is now the only silent artifact and the
suite asserts that, so an artifact added without declarations fails.
itc-org:Authority is declared, with Actor, Ownership, Membership, Role,
Responsibility and Accountability, which SecurityCanon and the identity model
already treat as organization-owned. The regression test that previously
asserted the blind spot now asserts that the kernel map's assignment and the
declaration agree.
Profile is deliberately left undeclared. The kernel map assigns it to Core, the
identity model owns it under accepted CUST-ADR-006, and Observability defines a
runtime performance profile. Three senses need a decision, not a declaration, so
it is recorded as open rather than forced.
Eleven boundary reviews are added beside the artifacts they describe, in the
shape the identity model has used since INFO-WP-0021. The largest finding is
that Core and the Information Space model restate eight provenance concepts in
nearly identical words; Core owns them and Information Space imports. Label,
Drift, Summary and Attribute are resolved by disambiguation rather than
transfer.
make check passes with 50 tests, clean validation, no stale generated assets.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 3588@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 24b80f66-e5a7-4e61-99fe-2d422e6d17da
SecurityCanon publishes an architecture-layer vocabulary for authority
relationships, the Mode of Authority, and references shared InfoTechCanon
concepts. This records the InfoTechCanon-side acceptance of that boundary and
adds reciprocal navigation from the federation interface README.
The accepted dispositions keep the layers apart. Mode of Authority describes the
relationship in which authority is exercised; CARING analyses how an
access-control implementation is composed. Auth Mode is orthogonal to access
operation and to CARING's Canonical Role and Plane, so the Operator role and the
OPERATE mode stay distinct concepts and neither is renamed. SecurityCanon does
not reuse Actor or Subject, which ITC-ACCESS owns and binds as "Subject is the
access-control view of an actor"; it renamed its on-behalf-of dimension to
AuthorityContext instead, so no change is required here.
Verified at security-canon b1fa25eb: all five pinned manifest hashes match Git
blobs at this commit and the sources are unchanged in the review checkout, and
none of the seven concepts SecurityCanon declares appears in any InfoTechCanon
owned_concepts declaration, so the boundary introduces no ownership conflict.
No concept is transferred and nothing is removed, so the corpus is unchanged.
Generated indexes and the repository tree are refreshed for the added file;
make check passes with 46 tests, clean validation and a passing small-saas
profile. This is an agent review, not human sign-off, and it records no consumer
adoption or conformance claim.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01AUkN13CAqtXWPXuEiEtmJj
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 36656@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 66d6eece-d245-43ca-85e8-68a1b5970a67
Finish ITC-WP-0013 (AttributeValueType under ITC-DATA) and ITC-WP-0014
T02/T03/T05/T06/T07. Capability contract schemas, live-catalog review
CLI, landscape/kernel-map pointers. Sit on this version.
§10.3 now accepts a consumer record that validates against the live
catalog; resource-control's backup restatement is that proof. ITC-GOV
gains EvidenceBasis in tiers (invoiced and measured are peers) and
ITC-CAP requires it on every consumption row (CAP-R10).
Define the intake and assimilation practice (incoming/ drop zone -> frozen
source snapshot -> Minimal Assimilation Profile -> disposition gate -> canon
transformation -> versioned change notes) and run it on the first inputs.
- infospace/assimilation/intake-and-assimilation-practice.md, incoming/README.md
- assimilation/it-capability-canon: frozen source, comparison matrix, 26
mappings, 8 proposed changes, 7 open questions, decision record (adapt)
- new model ITC-CAP with 41-capability machine-readable catalog, anchored to
owning canon models; CILM rejected, Profile renamed, Provision made explicit
- registered in canon.yaml / artifacts index / infospace.yaml; regenerated
briefs, indexes, views; canon version 0.1.0-scaffold -> 0.2.0 + CHANGELOG
- ITC-WP-0014 for promotion work; ITC-WP-0013 added to the workplan registry
make validate: ok (65 artifacts, 0 errors/warnings). make test: 22 passed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Register the InfoTechCanon Repository Layout Standard as a domain standard
(itc-repo-layout), processed from demand through the canon's Purpose/Demand
intake without collapsing existing model concepts.
- Register standard in artifacts/index.yaml, canon.yaml, infospace.yaml;
regenerate indexes, views, briefs, tree, and validation (validate green).
- T04: add reconciliation.yaml (partial/as-is dogfooding, declared core
conformance, recorded tensions); resolve the demand by moving it out of
demand/ to the evaluation pack as source-demand.md and removing demand/.
- T05: add consumer-adoption-brief.md for downstream repos.
- Update test artifact/standard counts (60->61, standards 2->3).
- Mark T03/T04/T05 done; workplan and registry status -> finished.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
