Federation partners pin an artifact path, a blob hash and a list of concept
names. Every review so far verified the hash and recorded the match as evidence.
A hash proves the reviewed file is the pinned file; it says nothing about whether
the concept named in the manifest exists in it. Nobody ran the second check until
INFO-WP-0027-T04, which found nine failures across the two accepted boundaries,
none of them a contested concept and all of them a citation naming the wrong
artifact or a name this canon never used.
The workplan adds a reusable import-review command in the shape emission-review
already uses, registers accepted manifests so drift is caught when this
repository changes rather than when a partner happens to look, generalises the
re-verification section into the review kit so an acceptance cannot again record
matching hashes as evidence of correct citation, and closes the two open pins
InterfaceCanon still owns.
Drift against a registered manifest is a warning, not an error: a stale partner
pin is not this repository's file to fix and must not fail its build.
Status is proposed: drafted from the INFO-WP-0027 findings, not yet reviewed by
the owner.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 3588@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 24b80f66-e5a7-4e61-99fe-2d422e6d17da
