From 79b20167e775118498d47d2b268e7724e535b228 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: tegwick Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 20:33:42 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Note NetKingdom layering review in INTENT Records this repository's layer in the NetKingdom IT-security layer model (Taxonomy / Tooling / Engines / Staff) and what should change in this INTENT as a result. Links to the review that established the model: gate-house/history/2026-08-28-security-layer-model-and-gate-house-recut.md The note flags pending adaptation only; the body is unchanged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 2564823@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 2a7ed827-4928-4b9f-8613-9135c9cadfe9 --- INTENT.md | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) diff --git a/INTENT.md b/INTENT.md index 1fe1dd7..8ec8f4f 100644 --- a/INTENT.md +++ b/INTENT.md @@ -1,5 +1,20 @@ # INTENT +> **NetKingdom layering review — 2026-08-28.** This repository's role was reviewed +> against the NetKingdom IT-security layer model: **Taxonomy → Tooling → Engines → +> Staff**, layered by determinism and by the kind of artifact each layer produces. +> Findings and the argument behind them: +> `gate-house/history/2026-08-28-security-layer-model-and-gate-house-recut.md`. +> The model as currently stated is `gate-house/INTENT.md` § "Where Gate House Sits"; +> it is ruled to become a `net-kingdom/canon/standards/` standard, not yet written. +> +> The layer rule that binds every repository: **Staff never touches tooling +> directly. It acts only through engine APIs.** +> +> **This repository is Taxonomy — cross-cutting, ecosystem-wide.** Clarify the split with net-kingdom canon: info-tech-canon owns cross-cutting semantic contracts and terminology for the whole ecosystem; NetKingdom-specific security architecture — including the layer model — is net-kingdom canon's. No change of role, only an explicit boundary so the two canons are not read as competing. +> +> *This note records what should change. The body below is not yet adapted.* + ## Purpose This repository exists to develop and maintain **InfoTechCanon**: an evolving, markdown-first reference system for building interoperable, adaptable, and extensible information-processing systems. From dc74164fff011e09c6852e63d6fd5fb880420203 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: tegwick Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 21:21:07 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Point layering note at the published standard The layer model is now published as net-kingdom/canon/standards/security-layer-model_v0.1.md (proposed) and ratified by gate-house GH-DEC-2026-001. The note previously said the standard was not yet written. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 2564823@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 2a7ed827-4928-4b9f-8613-9135c9cadfe9 --- INTENT.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/INTENT.md b/INTENT.md index 8ec8f4f..598c1aa 100644 --- a/INTENT.md +++ b/INTENT.md @@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ > Staff**, layered by determinism and by the kind of artifact each layer produces. > Findings and the argument behind them: > `gate-house/history/2026-08-28-security-layer-model-and-gate-house-recut.md`. -> The model as currently stated is `gate-house/INTENT.md` § "Where Gate House Sits"; -> it is ruled to become a `net-kingdom/canon/standards/` standard, not yet written. +> The model is `net-kingdom/canon/standards/security-layer-model_v0.1.md` (proposed), +> ratified by `gate-house/decisions/decisions.md` GH-DEC-2026-001. > > The layer rule that binds every repository: **Staff never touches tooling > directly. It acts only through engine APIs.** From 1dda84fc56467bb0c84610cfb6ffc8137a6d97a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: repo-manager Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 23:01:51 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] repo.work.create_intake ITC-IN-0001 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit correlation_id: d5052143-94f3-49e8-8cd5-0a0a135b8473 reason: Request own-voice layer declaration under §11 source: repo-manager Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 2564823@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 2a7ed827-4928-4b9f-8613-9135c9cadfe9 --- intakes/intakes.md | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+) create mode 100644 intakes/intakes.md diff --git a/intakes/intakes.md b/intakes/intakes.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6ab44a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/intakes/intakes.md @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +# Intake records + +## ITC-IN-0001 — Declaration requested: state this repository's layer in INTENT.md (security layer model §11) + +```yaml +id: ITC-IN-0001 +kind: intake +title: 'Declaration requested: state this repository''s layer in INTENT.md (security + layer model §11)' +status: open +origin: cross-repo +origin_ref: net-kingdom security-layer-model_v0.4 §11 +priority: low +owner: info-tech-canon +requested_by: gate-house +proposed_layer: Taxonomy +description: 'A conformance sweep on 2026-08-28 found this repository has no layer + declaration of its own. It carries a layering review note gate-house wrote into + the top of its INTENT.md on 2026-08-24, and that note names a layer — but the words + are gate-house''s, sitting above a line admitting the body is unadapted. Section + 11 has since been amended to say so explicitly: a layer stated about a repository + by another repository is not a declaration; only the repository''s own file, in + its own voice, conforms. Seven of fifteen estate-authored repositories have declared; + this is one of the eight that have not, and the standard does not claim adoption + on the basis of notes gate-house wrote. REQUESTED: state the layer in INTENT.md + in your own voice, or contest it. PROPOSED LAYER: Taxonomy. Cross-cutting semantic + contracts for the whole ecosystem; NetKingdom-specific security architecture is + net-kingdom canon''s. The boundary between the two canons is worth stating in your + own words. Contesting is a real option and costs nothing — the three repositories + that reviewed this model each returned a correction, two of which changed the standard. + If the proposed layer is wrong for what this repository actually does, that is more + useful to us than a label added to close a checkbox. Standard: net-kingdom/canon/standards/security-layer-model_v0.4.md.' +created: '2026-08-28T21:01:51.123381Z' +updated: '2026-08-28T21:01:51.123381Z' +```