assimilation: assimilation/it-capability-canon source: ITCC v0.1 note: > Concepts as the source names them, before canon comparison. Classification against the canon lives in comparison-matrix.md; the canonical names chosen on adoption are recorded in the canon_name field. concepts: - source_name: Capability definition: Abstract, implementation-independent ability an information system may require or provide. canon_name: Capability category: missing_concept - source_name: Capability Profile definition: Constrained specialization of a capability that does not change its identity. canon_name: CapabilityProfile category: covered_differently note: Distinct from a canon Profile (Core §8.6), which constrains canon artifacts for an implementation context. - source_name: Capability Domain definition: Navigation grouping of capabilities; not a semantic container. canon_name: CapabilityDomain category: missing_concept - source_name: Requirement definition: A statement that a system needs a capability at a minimum maturity. canon_name: CapabilityRequirement category: narrower_than_existing note: A typed, maturity-bearing form of DemandSignal / ConsumerNeed from the Purpose and Demand extension. - source_name: Provider definition: Operational entity that provides a capability in a particular context. canon_name: CapabilityProvider category: covered_differently note: Landscape owns ServiceProvider / Service / ServiceInstance; provider here is a role played by a landscape entity. - source_name: Implementation definition: Concrete technology, product, configuration, or composition used by a provider. canon_name: (imported) category: already_covered note: Landscape owns Technology / SoftwareEntity / RuntimeEntity. - source_name: Resource definition: Economic resource consumed while providing a capability (C, S, N, I, P). canon_name: CapabilityResourceClass category: missing_concept note: Landscape owns RuntimeResource as an entity; the C/S/N/I/P classification for cost attribution is new. - source_name: Evidence definition: Information supporting a capability or maturity claim. canon_name: (imported) category: already_covered note: Governance owns Evidence; Observability owns telemetry evidence. - source_name: Evidence Hook definition: Named evidence type expected for a specific capability. canon_name: CapabilityEvidenceHook category: missing_concept - source_name: Maturity definition: Quality and operational standing of a capability as provided in a specific context. canon_name: CapabilityMaturityLevel category: missing_concept - source_name: Provision definition: The relationship binding provider, capability, context, and maturity. canon_name: CapabilityProvision category: missing_concept note: Implicit in the source; made explicit on adoption because maturity attaches here and nowhere else. - source_name: Quality Dimension definition: Named quality attribute relevant to a capability (rpo, latency, assurance, ...). canon_name: CapabilityQualityDimension category: missing_concept - source_name: Capability Contract definition: Minimal machine-readable definition of a capability (id, purpose, profiles, qualities, relationships, evidence). canon_name: CapabilityContract category: missing_concept - source_name: Canon Graph definition: Capability relationships form a graph traversable from product need to technology and cost. canon_name: (structural) category: viewpoint_difference note: Core §6.4 "Network Before Tree" already states this stance canon-wide. - source_name: depends_on / may_use / composes definition: Capability-to-capability relationship types. canon_name: depends_on / may_use / composes category: missing_concept - source_name: requires / provides / implements / consumes definition: Landscape-entity-to-capability relationship types. canon_name: requires / provides / implements / consumes category: missing_concept - source_name: Canon inclusion rules definition: Seven tests a concept must pass to enter the capability set. canon_name: CapabilityInclusionRule category: narrower_than_existing note: Core §14 governs canon change generally; these are capability-specific admission tests. - source_name: CILM (Canonical IT Landscape Model) definition: Proposed sibling model owning landscape entities and intended/declared/applied/observed/assessed state. canon_name: (rejected) category: already_covered note: InfoTechCanonLandscapeModel owns this. Only the state-qualifier idea is carried forward as an open question.