Correct repo flavor to product; add SCOPE, AGENTS, classification
fix-consistency surfaced that GOAL.md's `repo_flavor: project` was wrong.
project-repository-flavor_v0.1.md reserves the prj- flavor for bounded
cross-repo coordination efforts and says durable products use INTENT.md and an
ordinary category. informed-decision is a durable product, so the C-35
"prj- flavor forbids shipping both INTENT.md and GOAL.md" contradiction was
self-inflicted rather than a real conflict.
- .repo-classification.yaml: category product, domain infotech.
- GOAL.md: drop repo_flavor/project_status, add a flavor note explaining that
GOAL.md is retained as the stage statement alongside a stable INTENT.md.
- SCOPE.md: honestly empty — states that nothing is implemented and that
INFD-WP-0001-T06 rewrites it after the gate-house ruling and the specs.
- AGENTS.md: shared State Hub / session / workplan boilerplate, plus the hard
rules for this repository — never decide, never own approval state, never
invent identity, never let awareness enter view_hash, never let an agent
bind, never fork the schema, fail closed.
- INFD-WP-0001: T01 records both corrections; T06 now rewrites SCOPE.md.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01V3W1dQG7GFFM9d94jFx7iR
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 1565372@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 16bb2f25-b34c-49ef-8e94-5fec3567a568
2026-09-09 12:38:41 +02:00
|
|
|
# Work Records — informed-decision
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> Generated by `statehub fix-consistency` (CUST-WP-0061-T04, work-record
|
|
|
|
|
> stage 3). Do not edit by hand — edit the source file/block listed for
|
|
|
|
|
> each record and re-run fix-consistency to refresh this index. Archived
|
|
|
|
|
> workplans are omitted; closed decisions/intakes/engagements stay listed
|
|
|
|
|
> so recently-resolved work is still visible. [auto]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Kind | ID | Status | Lane | Source |
|
|
|
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
2026-10-03 20:49:52 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | INFD-WP-ADHOC-2026-10-03 | finished | — | workplans/ADHOC-2026-10-03.md |
|
2026-09-21 22:09:20 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | INFD-WP-0003 | finished | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0003-my-decisions-overview.md |
|
2026-10-03 18:45:10 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | INFD-WP-0005 | blocked | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0005-frictionless-decision-intake.md |
|
2026-10-03 20:49:52 +02:00
|
|
|
| workplan | INFD-WP-0006 | finished | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0006-fresh-review-authentication.md |
|
2026-10-03 08:12:33 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | INFD-WP-ADHOC-2026-10-03-T01 | done | — | workplans/ADHOC-2026-10-03.md |
|
2026-10-03 20:49:52 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | INFD-WP-ADHOC-2026-10-03-T02 | done | — | workplans/ADHOC-2026-10-03.md |
|
2026-09-21 22:03:09 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | INFD-WP-0003-T01 | done | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0003-my-decisions-overview.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | INFD-WP-0003-T02 | done | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0003-my-decisions-overview.md |
|
2026-09-21 22:07:45 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | INFD-WP-0003-T03 | done | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0003-my-decisions-overview.md |
|
2026-09-21 22:09:20 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | INFD-WP-0003-T04 | done | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0003-my-decisions-overview.md |
|
2026-10-03 09:21:37 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | INFD-WP-0005-T01 | done | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0005-frictionless-decision-intake.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | INFD-WP-0005-T02 | done | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0005-frictionless-decision-intake.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | INFD-WP-0005-T03 | done | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0005-frictionless-decision-intake.md |
|
2026-10-03 18:45:10 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | INFD-WP-0005-T04 | done | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0005-frictionless-decision-intake.md |
|
2026-10-03 09:21:37 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | INFD-WP-0005-T05 | wait | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0005-frictionless-decision-intake.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| task | INFD-WP-0005-T06 | wait | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0005-frictionless-decision-intake.md |
|
2026-10-03 21:34:50 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | INFD-WP-0005-T07 | done | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0005-frictionless-decision-intake.md |
|
2026-10-03 09:21:37 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | INFD-WP-0005-T08 | wait | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0005-frictionless-decision-intake.md |
|
2026-10-03 18:45:10 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | INFD-WP-0005-T09 | done | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0005-frictionless-decision-intake.md |
|
2026-10-03 09:21:37 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | INFD-WP-0005-T10 | wait | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0005-frictionless-decision-intake.md |
|
2026-10-03 20:36:33 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | INFD-WP-0006-T01 | done | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0006-fresh-review-authentication.md |
|
2026-10-03 20:49:52 +02:00
|
|
|
| task | INFD-WP-0006-T02 | done | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0006-fresh-review-authentication.md |
|
2026-09-09 23:25:28 +02:00
|
|
|
| intake | INFD-IN-0001 | closed | blue | intakes/intakes.md |
|
2026-09-10 08:04:53 +02:00
|
|
|
| intake | INFD-IN-0002 | closed | blue | intakes/intakes.md |
|
2026-09-10 19:20:13 +02:00
|
|
|
| intake | INFD-IN-0003 | closed | blue | intakes/intakes.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| intake | INFD-IN-0004 | closed | blue | intakes/intakes.md |
|
Narrow INFD-IN-0006 to `surface` alone after railiance-master's correction
The custodian's record was corrected on 2026-09-21 while this request was being
written. railiance-master had already established — with fuller citations than
this repository had — that flex-auth's validator set {Staff, Engine, Tooling} is
not §3's enumeration: §3 has four rows and `Taxonomy` is the first, defined in
§3.1, catalogued in §4, mapped in §7 and given its own §17. It added the sharper
finding this repository had not reached: §3's table writes `Engines` while §4
types eight rows `Engine`, so two faithful conformance runs disagree about every
engine in the estate.
This repository reached the first half independently and before seeing the
correction, and now records it rather than re-arguing it. The consequence is
what matters: `surface` is the only surveyed value outside §3 itself, and the
only one that needs a ruling on whether the vocabulary is closed. The two cases
do not behave alike and should not be ruled on together — which is what the
corrected record says, and this repository agrees.
One point carries over into the closed outcome: if §3's vocabulary is ruled
closed, the closed set should be written out as declaration values rather than
inferred from table row labels. `Engines`/`Engine` is what happens otherwise,
and it is B1's shape one level further in.
Position unchanged; the declared value remains unchanged pending the ruling.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 63291@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 8bd77868-ca68-4f49-bb1e-d539ecc0d703
2026-09-21 02:14:00 +02:00
|
|
|
| intake | INFD-IN-0005 | open | blue | intakes/intakes.md |
|
2026-09-21 06:35:09 +02:00
|
|
|
| intake | INFD-IN-0006 | closed | blue | intakes/intakes.md |
|
|
|
|
|
| intake | INFD-IN-0007 | open | blue | intakes/intakes.md |
|
2026-09-21 22:45:49 +02:00
|
|
|
| intake | INFD-IN-0008 | open | blue | intakes/intakes.md |
|