Promote INFD-WP-0001 to active with a review note
C-23 flagged lifecycle drift: the workplan was still 'proposed' while T02 sat at 'progress'. ADR-007 correctly refuses to auto-promote, so this is a deliberate promotion rather than a status the tool inferred. The plan is genuinely being worked and the review it was pending has happened: against approval-engine's INTENT/SCOPE/layer.yaml/WP-0002 and its keycape service registrations, the accepted security layer model v0.7 and companion, the repo-classification and project-repository-flavor standards, and the schema, state-transition tables and vectors in history/. Also corrected the body text, which claimed T03-T05 would all be rewritten if the ruling differs. That was too broad: only T05 and T07 depend on the catalog row. T03, T04 and T06 describe what the surface must do and what the evidence must contain, and neither changes with layer placement. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01V3W1dQG7GFFM9d94jFx7iR Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 1565372@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 16bb2f25-b34c-49ef-8e94-5fec3567a568
This commit is contained in:
parent
7e5fb59ddf
commit
7ae67b2f4e
2 changed files with 22 additions and 8 deletions
|
|
@ -10,9 +10,9 @@
|
|||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| workplan | INFD-WP-0001 | proposed | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0001-founding-specs-and-approver-ui-ownership.md |
|
||||
| task | INFD-WP-0001-T01 | done | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0001-founding-specs-and-approver-ui-ownership.md |
|
||||
| task | INFD-WP-0001-T02 | todo | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0001-founding-specs-and-approver-ui-ownership.md |
|
||||
| task | INFD-WP-0001-T03 | todo | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0001-founding-specs-and-approver-ui-ownership.md |
|
||||
| task | INFD-WP-0001-T04 | todo | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0001-founding-specs-and-approver-ui-ownership.md |
|
||||
| task | INFD-WP-0001-T02 | progress | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0001-founding-specs-and-approver-ui-ownership.md |
|
||||
| task | INFD-WP-0001-T03 | done | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0001-founding-specs-and-approver-ui-ownership.md |
|
||||
| task | INFD-WP-0001-T04 | done | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0001-founding-specs-and-approver-ui-ownership.md |
|
||||
| task | INFD-WP-0001-T05 | todo | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0001-founding-specs-and-approver-ui-ownership.md |
|
||||
| task | INFD-WP-0001-T06 | todo | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0001-founding-specs-and-approver-ui-ownership.md |
|
||||
| task | INFD-WP-0001-T07 | todo | — | workplans/INFD-WP-0001-founding-specs-and-approver-ui-ownership.md |
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -4,11 +4,23 @@ type: workplan
|
|||
title: "Founding specs and approver-UI ownership"
|
||||
domain: infotech
|
||||
repo: informed-decision
|
||||
status: proposed
|
||||
status: active
|
||||
owner: claude
|
||||
topic_slug: netkingdom
|
||||
created: "2026-09-09"
|
||||
updated: "2026-09-09"
|
||||
reviewed_at: "2026-09-09"
|
||||
reviewed_against_commit: "ee2cca5"
|
||||
reviewed_note: >-
|
||||
Reviewed against approval-engine's INTENT, SCOPE, layer.yaml,
|
||||
APPROVAL-WP-0002 and docs/keycape-service-registrations.md; the accepted
|
||||
NetKingdom security layer model v0.7 and companion v0.2; the
|
||||
repo-classification and project-repository-flavor standards; and the
|
||||
Decision Memo schema, state-transition tables and canonicalization vectors in
|
||||
history/20260909-initial-exploration. Repo-owned specification work can
|
||||
proceed. T05 and T07 remain externally gated on the gate-house ruling
|
||||
requested as INFD-IN-0001; T08 is additionally gated on
|
||||
APPROVAL-WP-0002-T01 and a deployed approval-engine.
|
||||
origin: founding
|
||||
origin_ref: history/20260909-initial-exploration/InitialExploration.md
|
||||
state_hub_workstream_id: "a985a65a-08f7-5a39-8645-b618ea022657"
|
||||
|
|
@ -30,10 +42,12 @@ engine. That component is not in this repo."* `APPROVAL-WP-0002-T01` remains
|
|||
`progress` partly because of it. This workplan closes that gap by naming the
|
||||
owner and shipping the contract.
|
||||
|
||||
**Status is `proposed`, pending review** against the current `approval-engine`,
|
||||
`access-engine`, `key-cape`, `gate-house` and `audit-core` contracts, and
|
||||
against the deployment estate. T02 is the gate: if `gate-house` places this
|
||||
component differently, T03–T05 are rewritten before they are written.
|
||||
**Reviewed 2026-09-09; the plan is active.** Reviewed against the contracts
|
||||
listed in the frontmatter. T02 remains the gate for the *architecture*: if
|
||||
`gate-house` places this component differently, T05 and T07 are rewritten before
|
||||
they are written. T03, T04 and T06 are independent of the ruling because they
|
||||
describe what the surface must do and what the evidence must contain, neither of
|
||||
which changes with the catalog row.
|
||||
|
||||
Scope boundary for this workplan: **specification and contract, plus one
|
||||
walking skeleton**. Full L3 product build is residual and belongs to
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue