coulomb/informed-decision
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Request sitting-requester OpenBao custody without allocating a CCR.

Browse source 
Verifier + attended reader on a new informed-decision KV path, not a
widening of CCR-2026-0024/0025. Intents still match approval-engine
canonical binding. No secret, no apply, no bind.

Assistant: grok
Assistant-Session: 01a09dc1-b21e-77e1-919e-fcad2f82b267
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-09-15 01:04:10 +02:00
parent c333063185
commit 8c03eb85c0
6 changed files with 123 additions and 3 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

3
docs/keycape-sitting-requester-registration.md
View file

@ -5,7 +5,8 @@
**Copied to:** `approval-engine` (`docs/keycape-service-registrations.md` —
“no requester identity has been settled for `approval:create`”)
**Status:** requested 2026-09-14. **Not registered. Not in OpenBao. No secret
is in this repository.**
is in this repository.** Custody request (no CCR id):
`docs/sitting-requester-custody-request.md`.
This is the missing presenter for compact Decision Memo sittings whose
protected side effect is a **work-record update** (`INFD-WP-0002-T04`), not a