227 lines
6 KiB
Markdown
227 lines
6 KiB
Markdown
|
|
# Infospace Bench Product Requirements Document V0.1
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## infospace-bench
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 1. Product Overview
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 1.1 Product Name
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**infospace-bench**
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 1.2 Product Definition
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
infospace-bench is a **workspace and service for creating, developing, evaluating, and inspecting structured knowledge spaces (“infospaces”)**.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
It provides an environment for applying structured knowledge methods to real-world domains such as books, research corpora, projects, and organizational knowledge systems.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 2. Product Intent
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 2.1 Problem Statement
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
While tools and systems for structured knowledge exist:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* There is no consistent way to **develop and evaluate knowledge spaces in practice**
|
|||
|
|
* Knowledge engineering approaches remain abstract and hard to validate
|
|||
|
|
* Real-world knowledge artifacts lack **structured inspection and quality evaluation**
|
|||
|
|
* Iterative refinement of knowledge systems is often ad-hoc and untraceable
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
This results in a gap between **knowledge theory and applied knowledge systems**.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 2.2 Intended Outcomes
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
infospace-bench enables:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Creation of **explicit, structured knowledge spaces** as first-class artifacts
|
|||
|
|
* Iterative **development, evaluation, and refinement** of knowledge collections
|
|||
|
|
* Inspection of **structure, quality, and relationships** within knowledge
|
|||
|
|
* Application of AI-assisted workflows to real-world knowledge problems
|
|||
|
|
* Generation of reusable patterns and insights for knowledge engineering
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 2.3 Success Criteria
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The product is successful when:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Infospaces can be **created, evolved, and inspected systematically**
|
|||
|
|
* Knowledge quality can be **evaluated and improved over time**
|
|||
|
|
* Real-world use cases (books, domains, projects) can be modeled effectively
|
|||
|
|
* AI agents can contribute meaningfully to **knowledge development workflows**
|
|||
|
|
* Insights from infospaces inform improvements in lower-layer systems
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 3. Scope Definition
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 3.1 In Scope
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Definition and management of infospaces as structured knowledge collections
|
|||
|
|
* Lifecycle management: creation, population, evaluation, refinement, export
|
|||
|
|
* Inspection tools for structure, relationships, and quality
|
|||
|
|
* Application of workflows (generation, transformation, analysis) to infospaces
|
|||
|
|
* AI-assisted development and evaluation of knowledge artifacts
|
|||
|
|
* Use-case-specific configurations and project setups
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 3.2 Out of Scope
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Low-level markdown processing or transformation primitives
|
|||
|
|
* Persistent system infrastructure or orchestration engines
|
|||
|
|
* Generic multi-format content management systems
|
|||
|
|
* Reusable tooling libraries or platform-level abstractions
|
|||
|
|
* Final production publishing platforms (outside knowledge development context)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 3.3 Boundary Clarification
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
infospace-bench provides **application-level usage**, not infrastructure:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Tooling primitives → `markitect-tool`
|
|||
|
|
* System/runtime orchestration → `kontextual-engine`
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 4. Functional Expectations
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 4.1 Core Capabilities
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The product must support:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* **Infospace Definition**
|
|||
|
|
Create structured knowledge collections with clear boundaries
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* **Population & Development**
|
|||
|
|
Add, modify, and organize knowledge artifacts
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* **Evaluation & Quality Assessment**
|
|||
|
|
Measure structure, consistency, and completeness
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* **Inspection & Visualization**
|
|||
|
|
Explore relationships, dependencies, and structure
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* **Transformation & Generation**
|
|||
|
|
Apply workflows to evolve knowledge artifacts
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* **Export & Representation**
|
|||
|
|
Produce outputs (documents, reports, derived artifacts)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 4.2 Interaction Modes
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Project/workspace-based interaction
|
|||
|
|
* CLI and/or service interfaces
|
|||
|
|
* Agent-assisted workflows
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 5. Non-Functional Expectations
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 5.1 Performance
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Efficient handling of medium-to-large knowledge collections
|
|||
|
|
* Reasonable responsiveness for interactive inspection and iteration
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 5.2 Reliability
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Consistent behavior in evaluation and transformation workflows
|
|||
|
|
* Traceable changes and reproducible results
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 5.3 Extensibility
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Ability to incorporate new workflows and evaluation methods
|
|||
|
|
* Flexible configuration for different domains and use cases
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 5.4 Usability
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Clear structure for organizing knowledge projects
|
|||
|
|
* Intuitive workflows for iteration and refinement
|
|||
|
|
* Transparency of system behavior and results
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 6. Assumptions and Dependencies
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 6.1 Assumptions
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Knowledge engineering benefits from iterative, project-based development
|
|||
|
|
* AI agents can assist in generating and refining knowledge
|
|||
|
|
* Structured knowledge systems require evaluation and inspection
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 6.2 Dependencies
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* kontextual-engine for persistence and orchestration
|
|||
|
|
* markitect-tool for markdown-based structuring and transformation
|
|||
|
|
* llm-connect (or equivalent) for AI-assisted workflows
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 7. Constraints
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Must remain focused on **concrete infospaces**, not abstract infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
* Must avoid duplication of tooling or system-level responsibilities
|
|||
|
|
* Must support both human and AI-driven workflows
|
|||
|
|
* Must maintain clear traceability of knowledge evolution
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 8. Risks
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Drifting into general-purpose platform or CMS functionality
|
|||
|
|
* Over-complex evaluation frameworks reducing usability
|
|||
|
|
* Tight coupling to specific tools or formats
|
|||
|
|
* Loss of clarity between experimentation and production usage
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 9. Related Systems
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* **markitect-tool** – syntax layer (markdown primitives)
|
|||
|
|
* **kontextual-engine** – system layer (persistence and orchestration)
|
|||
|
|
* **llm-connect** – LLM abstraction layer
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 10. Ecosystem Context
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
This product is part of a layered knowledge system:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text id="k2pz7m"
|
|||
|
|
markitect-tool → makes markdown structured and manipulable
|
|||
|
|
kontextual-engine → makes knowledge persistent and operable
|
|||
|
|
infospace-bench → makes knowledge concrete and meaningful
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Layers:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* **Syntax layer** → markitect-tool
|
|||
|
|
* **System layer** → kontextual-engine
|
|||
|
|
* **Application layer** → infospace-bench
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 11. PRD Type
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**Hybrid / Boundary PRD**
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
This PRD defines application-level intent and usage boundaries while allowing flexibility for experimentation and iterative development.
|
|||
|
|
|