intelligence-radar/docs/evidence/source-comparison-2026-09-13.md

29 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

# Capability comparison — 2026-09-13
Source-backed comparison; evidence gaps remain explicit.
Recommendation: `024a468396eb7d73840df04271cff4c42cd14ced1b249810c399b5a565dea5f1`
Policy: `advisor-v0.2`
| Profile | Eligible | Fitness proxy | Scenario USD | Outcome trials |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| claude-sonnet-5-api-default | False | unknown | 0.0700 | 0 |
| claude-haiku-4-5-api-default | False | unknown | 0.0500 | 0 |
Frontier: undetermined
Efficient: undetermined
Budget: undetermined
## Evidence gaps
- Fewer than five relevant distinct measurements; ranking withheld.
- No eligible profile has complete benchmark evidence.
- no_evidenced_sufficient_model
- claude-sonnet-5-api-default: constraint min_context not satisfied; constraint requester_access not satisfied
- claude-sonnet-5-api-default: missing scicode, terminal-bench, browsecomp, bfcl, swe-bench-verified
- claude-haiku-4-5-api-default: constraint min_context not satisfied; constraint requester_access not satisfied
- claude-haiku-4-5-api-default: missing scicode, terminal-bench, browsecomp, bfcl, swe-bench-verified
Cost is a declared token/tool/retry/verification scenario, not a measured success-cost distribution.
Source review does not prove requester access or task success. See saved inputs for capture references.