Integrate founding explorations and bootstrap operational radar

Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra
Assistant-Session: 01a09c77-b1a9-7eb3-b501-6cb24b458c97

docs/adr/0001-initial-operational-baseline.md

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+# ADR 0001 — Local evidence workflow and normative precedence
+
+Status: accepted, 2026-09-13.
+
+Use ChatGPT's INTENT, concept model, and evaluation method as the governing design.
+Integrate Grok's editorial structure and reading material. Keep source archives
+immutable. Runtime records are content-addressed JSON envelopes; analysts supply
+source material and review claims. This needs no hosted infrastructure to operate.
+
+Precedence: INTENT → TaskModelEvaluationMethod → versioned policies → operational
+templates. ArchitectureBlueprint describes the target; SCOPE describes implementation.
+All imported current-world claims require verification before recommendations.
+Benchmark fitness must not be reported as calibrated task success.
+
+Domain `infotech`, topic `custodian` fits the existing cognitive infrastructure
+umbrella. `IR-WP-` identifies file-backed workplans; Statehub is their projection.

docs/evidence/bootstrap.md

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+# Bootstrap evidence — 2026-09-13
+
+- Both source archive SHA-256 checks pass against history/MANIFEST.json.
+- `make check`: seven behavior tests passed; core files and empty operational ledger valid.
+- `make demo`: isolated synthetic record, duplicate import, daily draft and weekly draft passed.
+- Statehub registration: repository `3130bd49-a43f-4682-a25d-68b4d4de9b1f`,
+  topic `cee7bedf-2b48-46ef-8601-006474f2ad7a` (`infotech/custodian`), host `bnt-lap001`.
+- Source ZIPs contain unverified research claims; no automated facts, live recommendations,
+  scheduler, notifications or paid inference were enabled.
+- LICENSE is inherited unchanged from the current Coulomb repo-seed template;
+  no repository Phase has been declared.
+
+Projection verification is in progress. IR-WP-0002-T03 remains open until a primary
+Statehub reconciliation receipt binds the pushed source commit.

docs/integration-review.md

@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+# Founding integration review — 2026-09-13
+
+## Inputs and evaluation
+
+Both source ZIPs remain unchanged in `history/`; `history/MANIFEST.json` records
+SHA-256 checksums. ChatGPT contributes 13 files and Grok contributes 17 files
+(including a DOCX charter and its JavaScript generator). Neither is a runtime.
+The DOCX and generator remain recoverable from the Grok archive; its Markdown
+content supplies the working charter without introducing a document-build dependency.
+The archive READMEs and ChatGPT MANIFEST remain in the ZIPs as provenance.
+
+ChatGPT is stronger on entity boundaries, historical reproducibility, source discipline,
+benchmark validity, task-specific ranking, cost accounting, and calibration.
+Its architecture is aspirational and its catalogs lack versioned observed results.
+Grok is stronger on accessible theory maps, editorial cadence, a practical watchlist,
+and a usable ticket shape. Its illustrative routing arithmetic overstates confidence.
+Both include dated factual claims without captured retrieval evidence; neither can
+seed a trusted production model/price database without verification.
+
+## Resolution
+
+| Conflict or gap | Integrated decision |
+| --- | --- |
+| Two descriptions and methods | INTENT governs; TaskModelEvaluationMethod and policies govern the advisor; task-router is the operator interface |
+| Fixed Grok weights vs task-specific selection | Select five distinct instruments using benchmark-selection-v0.1; normalize task-specific weights and report weak coverage |
+| Benchmark percent equals P(success) | Preserve task-fit proxy separately; no Sufficient/Budget claim without adequate calibration evidence |
+| Grok 0.70/0.85 vs ChatGPT risk thresholds | Adopt exploratory .60, routine .80, important .90, high_assurance .97 as explicit provisional policies |
+| Less than 10% vs inclusive 0.90 formula | Adopt at most 10% degradation (inclusive .90 boundary) |
+| Price conflicts, e.g. Terra ranges; blended vs separate rates | Retain historical drafts, do not choose an unsupported price; require dated deployment-specific evidence |
+| Fixed p25/p50/p75 vs p50/p90 | Use p50/p90 where justified; otherwise a labeled assumption range, never fabricated quantiles |
+| Aggregate index in worked example | Supersede operational example; retain original in ZIP; composite index cannot replace one of the five instruments |
+| External automation IDs described as live | Archive-only references; scheduling here is planned and disabled |
+| PostgreSQL/object storage target with no implementation | Start with auditable Git + content-addressed JSON; retain migration as future work |
+
+## Imported file treatment
+
+ChatGPT root design files, policy YAML, benchmark seed and landscape were promoted.
+Grok compendium, watchlist, frontier snapshots and dated digests were imported with
+unverified-draft banners. Router method/template/example and ops instructions were
+rewritten to agree with the governing method. The atlas remains candidate discovery,
+not a source of verified benchmark versions. Raw originals remain in the ZIPs.
+
+## Acceptance evidence
+
+`make check` checks archive integrity, core files, and the observation ledger and
+runs behavior tests. `make demo` exercises record → validate → daily/weekly draft
+without polluting the operational ledger. Statehub results are recorded in
+`docs/evidence/bootstrap.md` after synchronization.