> Imported research draft. Benchmark versions, availability, and source claims require verification before operational use.

# Intelligence Radar — Source Catalog

**Status:** Seed catalog 0.1  
**Date:** 2026-09-13

## 1. Source policy

The monitoring system should aggressively discover information but conservatively promote claims.

Priority order for durable facts:

1. original research/data;
2. benchmark maintainers;
3. official model/system cards and provider documentation;
4. official standards/regulatory/legal sources;
5. independent evaluators and systematic syntheses;
6. expert interpretation;
7. journalism/social discussion for discovery.

A thinker being influential is a reason to monitor them, not a reason to accept their claims.

## 2. Scientific research streams

Monitor primary publications and proceedings in:

- machine learning and AI;
- cognitive science;
- neuroscience;
- psychology/psychometrics;
- robotics;
- complex systems;
- cybernetics/control;
- collective intelligence;
- computational biology;
- philosophy of mind where empirically relevant.

High-signal discovery surfaces include arXiv categories, major peer-reviewed journals, and major conference proceedings. The source registry should resolve interesting discoveries to the actual paper/repository/data.

## 3. AI labs and model providers — official sources

Seed set:

- OpenAI — releases, model/system cards, API/model docs, safety/deployment material.
- Anthropic — research, model releases, system cards, API docs, pricing.
- Google DeepMind / Google AI — research, model cards, Gemini API docs.
- Meta AI — model/research releases.
- xAI — model releases and technical documentation.
- DeepSeek — model/research releases.
- Alibaba/Qwen — model/research releases.
- Mistral AI — model/research releases.
- Cohere — model/research releases.
- NVIDIA — model, inference, accelerator, and serving research.
- major open-weight research organizations as they emerge.

## 4. Evaluation and benchmark maintainers

Seed set:

- SWE-bench
- Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)
- METR
- ARC Prize / ARC-AGI
- OSWorld
- Sierra research / τ-bench family
- MLCommons / MLPerf
- SciCode
- Humanity's Last Exam maintainers
- major benchmark authors/repositories discovered through current research

Each benchmark needs its own version/change monitor.

## 5. Independent capability/economics measurement

### Artificial Analysis

Useful for:

- cross-provider model measurements;
- benchmark results;
- cost per task;
- token use;
- speed/latency;
- provider comparisons;
- evolving aggregate and domain indices.

Treat its private tests and methodology as independent evidence, not fully reproducible primary benchmark truth.

### Stanford HAI AI Index

Useful periodic synthesis of:

- capability trends;
- benchmark health;
- economics;
- adoption;
- social/policy trends.

### Additional independent evaluators

Add only after documenting methodology, independence, update cadence, and data access.

## 6. Hardware and inference engineering

Seed primary sources:

- MLCommons / MLPerf;
- NVIDIA;
- AMD;
- Intel;
- Google Cloud/TPU material;
- AWS accelerator/inference infrastructure;
- Microsoft/Azure infrastructure;
- hyperscaler research and engineering publications;
- compiler/serving projects relevant to inference economics.

Track:

- throughput;
- latency;
- power;
- memory;
- interconnect;
- quantization;
- batching;
- speculative decoding;
- serving frameworks;
- price/performance.

## 7. Regulation, standards, and institutions

### European Union

Monitor original European Commission / AI Office / EUR-Lex materials for AI Act implementation, delegated/implementing acts, codes, guidance, and enforcement milestones.

### United States

Monitor relevant NIST, federal agency, legislative, standards, and official policy sources.

### International

Monitor:

- OECD AI policy materials;
- ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42 where accessible;
- IEEE standards initiatives;
- Council of Europe AI convention implementation;
- other jurisdictions as capability or market relevance requires.

## 8. Thinker watchlist — seed, not canon

The watchlist should span disagreement.

Candidate clusters:

### Foundations / learning / AI

- Geoffrey Hinton
- Yann LeCun
- Yoshua Bengio
- Richard Sutton
- Demis Hassabis
- Ilya Sutskever
- Dario Amodei
- François Chollet

### Cognitive science / neuroscience / intelligence

- active researchers in psychometrics, cognitive architectures, predictive processing, memory, development, animal cognition, and computational neuroscience.

### Systems / cybernetics lineage

Historical compendium coverage should include:

- Norbert Wiener
- W. Ross Ashby
- Stafford Beer
- Heinz von Foerster
- Humberto Maturana
- Francisco Varela

Current monitoring should focus on contemporary researchers extending relevant ideas rather than treating historical figures as news sources.

### Critique / alternative interpretations

Monitor credible researchers who challenge:

- scaling narratives;
- benchmark validity;
- claims of generality;
- economic assumptions;
- safety assumptions;
- anthropomorphic interpretations.

The purpose is epistemic diversity, not artificial balance.

## 9. Source record schema

```yaml
id: source-...
name: ...
kind: paper_feed|lab|benchmark|provider_docs|regulator|thinker|journal|evaluator
primary: true
trust_tier: A
topics: [...]
url: ...
retrieval:
  mode: rss|html|api|github|manual
  cadence: daily
importance: 0.9
last_reviewed: 2026-09-13
notes: ...
```

## 10. Source-health policy

Periodically score:

- authority for the claimed fact;
- independence;
- reproducibility;
- provenance quality;
- update timeliness;
- correction transparency;
- historical reliability;
- machine-retrieval stability.

A source can be excellent for one class of fact and weak for another.

Example:

A provider's API page is authoritative for its **current list price**, but not neutral evidence that its model is the world's best.