diff --git a/reviews/INTERFACE-WP-0004/latest-thread-check.json b/reviews/INTERFACE-WP-0004/latest-thread-check.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0b22282 --- /dev/null +++ b/reviews/INTERFACE-WP-0004/latest-thread-check.json @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +{ + "checked_at": "2026-09-09T20:27:01.833600+00:00", + "threads": [ + { + "recipient": "info-tech-canon", + "thread_id": "31e6da7f-9dd2-4149-80f5-67cc19a81299", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "31e6da7f-9dd2-4149-80f5-67cc19a81299", + "from_agent": "interface-canon", + "to_agent": "info-tech-canon", + "read_at": "2026-09-09T20:26:45.592426Z", + "created_at": "2026-09-09T20:21:25.914121Z" + } + ], + "reply_count": 0 + }, + { + "recipient": "facetted-interfaces", + "thread_id": "cb3a7690-f145-4559-969f-c6f800994de0", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "cb3a7690-f145-4559-969f-c6f800994de0", + "from_agent": "interface-canon", + "to_agent": "facetted-interfaces", + "read_at": null, + "created_at": "2026-09-09T20:21:32.766003Z" + } + ], + "reply_count": 0 + }, + { + "recipient": "repo-manager", + "thread_id": "f3c2e50c-0d66-4567-9ac3-c428d40fc333", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "f3c2e50c-0d66-4567-9ac3-c428d40fc333", + "from_agent": "interface-canon", + "to_agent": "repo-manager", + "read_at": "2026-09-09T20:26:50.980837Z", + "created_at": "2026-09-09T20:21:43.697458Z" + } + ], + "reply_count": 0 + } + ] +} diff --git a/workplans/INTERFACE-WP-0004-federation-acceptance.md b/workplans/INTERFACE-WP-0004-federation-acceptance.md index d0880b5..80fdff2 100644 --- a/workplans/INTERFACE-WP-0004-federation-acceptance.md +++ b/workplans/INTERFACE-WP-0004-federation-acceptance.md @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ state_hub_workstream_id: "cb0b8342-4b9a-5d73-876d-dc857f8aee8d" # Establish external federation acceptance and consumer adoption The local mapping review and source-based consumer proof are complete. Stable -promotion requires externally evidenced acceptance and adoption. This proposed +promotion requires externally evidenced acceptance and adoption. This active plan records the remaining work without claiming control over peer backlogs. ## Obtain upstream boundary acceptance @@ -63,3 +63,16 @@ Message IDs, timestamps, recipients, and exact sent bodies are retained in the [delivery receipts](../reviews/INTERFACE-WP-0004/README.md#delivery-receipts). Next action: review replies, apply accepted corrections, and record owner evidence. Model/card publication remains draft 0.1.1. No peer checkout was changed. + +## Open-task check — 2026-09-09 + +The repository files and Statehub projection both contain two open tasks, T01 and +T02, waiting for owner responses. [Thread check](../reviews/INTERFACE-WP-0004/latest-thread-check.json) +found zero replies in all three request threads. InfoTechCanon and Repo Manager +requests were marked read; the FIAM request was unread at the recorded check. +Read status is not acceptance. There are no requested corrections to implement. + +The offline brief was stale and has been regenerated from the current hub +projection. T01 needs the InfoTechCanon and FIAM boundary responses; T02 needs +Repo Manager adoption evidence before publication can be reassessed. Keep both +open and preserve draft status until those records arrive.