interface-canon/infospace/reviews/acceptance

Owner acceptance evidence

Workplan: INTERFACE-WP-0004. Checked 2026-09-09 against repository Git records as well as Statehub threads. Acceptance can be evidenced by an owner-repository record before a message reply arrives; uncommitted files are not a pinned receipt.

Owner	Evidence	Status and scope
facetted-interfaces	Pinned acceptance source, commit cceb005c9cacbc1705c7a3f8e7367255de8a5731	Codex acting for FIAM accepted draft 0.1.1 derivation fidelity and authority boundaries. No blocking semantic corrections; no stable promotion or runtime certification.
info-tech-canon	Pinned acceptance source, commit f921e5a543db8da49781bd560d303f780623d204	Codex accepted the shared semantic boundaries with clarifications now implemented in 0.1.2. Agent review of requested 0.1.1; no separate human sign-off or stable promotion.
repo-manager	Pinned adoption source, commit 84df076e95ccafaccb1d8f9ef0878da4cf9278a7	Codex accepted draft 0.1.1 for documentation of the existing Statehub synchronization interface. No runtime dependency, blanket stable approval, or FIAM conformance claim.

Implemented clarifications

Draft 0.1.2 makes explicit that Network Port includes physical/device and transport ports; the existing TCP example did not enumerate the full scope. Mappings also clarify version/capture for mutable evidence containers, the explicit interest required for Evidence, and that implementing a contract does not necessarily make an artifact a KnowledgeArtifact. Resource/shape mappings remain context-dependent, with no universal subtyping or equivalence claim.

These clarifications agree with the already pinned ITC-NET, ITC-EVID, and ITC-INFOSPACE definitions. They implement the clarifications in the now-committed InfoTechCanon review and remain independently supported by those committed imports.

The FIAM review targets InterfaceCanon commit 1fc82ec6655ed286cea3be284e33d08e7b27edc3 / model 0.1.1. It is not a claim that FIAM separately reread the local 0.1.2 clarification revision. The original FIAM standard pins and all shared-model import pins remain unchanged.

Completion

T01 and T02 are complete. Committed owner records establish FIAM derivation acceptance, InfoTechCanon boundary acceptance, and Repo Manager documentation adoption. The requested corrections and publication assessment are complete. There are no residual implementation tasks from this workplan. A later stable release or changed source revision needs its own justified review; remaining draft is the assessed publication outcome, not an unfinished delivery item.

Consumer adoption and publication assessment

Repo Manager adopted the mapping with explicit limits: its client checks primary health and consumes the outcome, but does not independently validate the entire receipt schema or compare returned commit fields. Commit equality is checked by the provider. Sending an idempotency header does not itself prove server-side deduplication. These limits are now explicit in the local consumer example.

All three owners reviewed the requested 0.1.1 source revision. Repo Manager acknowledges the later network-Port clarification while retaining its 0.1.1 review pin. This is evidence of scoped documentation adoption; it does not establish that the owners separately reviewed all of 0.1.2 or accepted a stable standard.

Publication decision: retain draft 0.1.2. Consumer adoption is sufficient to close the bounded T02 evidence-and-assessment task; stable promotion remains premature because the approvals themselves are explicitly draft-scoped and the FIAM source remains a draft. A completed assessment may conclude “remain draft.”