interface-canon/infospace/reviews/acceptance

Owner acceptance evidence

Workplan: INTERFACE-WP-0004. Checked 2026-09-09 against repository Git records as well as Statehub threads. Acceptance can be evidenced by an owner-repository record before a message reply arrives; uncommitted files are not a pinned receipt.

Owner	Evidence	Status and scope
facetted-interfaces	Pinned acceptance source, commit cceb005c9cacbc1705c7a3f8e7367255de8a5731	Codex acting for FIAM accepted draft 0.1.1 derivation fidelity and authority boundaries. No blocking semantic corrections; no stable promotion or runtime certification.
info-tech-canon	infospace/interfaces/interface-canon-boundary.md observed in the peer checkout	Agent acceptance text and clarifications are present, but the file has no containing commit at this check. Await a committed review record before counting T01 complete.
repo-manager	Pinned adoption source, commit 84df076e95ccafaccb1d8f9ef0878da4cf9278a7	Codex accepted draft 0.1.1 for documentation of the existing Statehub synchronization interface. No runtime dependency, blanket stable approval, or FIAM conformance claim.

Implemented clarifications

Draft 0.1.2 makes explicit that Network Port includes physical/device and transport ports; the existing TCP example did not enumerate the full scope. Mappings also clarify version/capture for mutable evidence containers, the explicit interest required for Evidence, and that implementing a contract does not necessarily make an artifact a KnowledgeArtifact. Resource/shape mappings remain context-dependent, with no universal subtyping or equivalence claim.

These clarifications agree with the already pinned ITC-NET, ITC-EVID, and ITC-INFOSPACE definitions. They were prompted by the visible InfoTechCanon review, but are supported independently by those committed imports. We do not represent the uncommitted peer file as a finalized revision.

The FIAM review targets InterfaceCanon commit 1fc82ec6655ed286cea3be284e33d08e7b27edc3 / model 0.1.1. It is not a claim that FIAM separately reread the local 0.1.2 clarification revision. The original FIAM standard pins and all shared-model import pins remain unchanged.

Remaining work

T01 needs the committed InfoTechCanon boundary record; FIAM's part is recorded. T02 is complete: consumer-owned adoption is pinned and publication was assessed below. Keep T01 open and the model/card draft. The migration ledger remains outside this extension's acceptance scope.

Consumer adoption and publication assessment

Repo Manager adopted the mapping with explicit limits: its client checks primary health and consumes the outcome, but does not independently validate the entire receipt schema or compare returned commit fields. Commit equality is checked by the provider. Sending an idempotency header does not itself prove server-side deduplication. These limits are now explicit in the local consumer example.

Both FIAM and Repo Manager reviewed the requested 0.1.1 source revision. Repo Manager acknowledges the later network-Port clarification while retaining its 0.1.1 review pin. This is evidence of scoped documentation adoption; it does not establish that either owner reviewed all of 0.1.2 or accepted a stable standard.

Publication decision: retain draft 0.1.2. Consumer adoption is sufficient to close the bounded T02 evidence-and-assessment task; stable promotion remains premature while InfoTechCanon's review lacks a committed record and the approvals themselves are explicitly draft-scoped. A completed assessment may conclude “remain draft.”