Add bounded resource audiences and enforce browser scope grants

Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra
Assistant-Session: 01a06e87-e039-7ed2-b85c-20ad37f8a21b

.custodian-brief.md

@@ -2,18 +2,16 @@
 # Custodian Brief — key-cape
 
 **Domain:** infotech  
-**Last synced:** 2026-08-25 17:53 UTC  
+**Last synced:** 2026-09-04 22:33 UTC  
 **State Hub:** http://127.0.0.1:8000 *(adjust if running on a remote machine)*
 
 ## Active Workstreams
 
-*(none — repo may need first-session setup)*
+### Approval-engine resource audience and client registrations
+Progress: 1/2 done  |  workplan_id: `6e815d88-b0e3-5ce0-be5d-13ab15917f7f`
 
-## Inbox Hygiene
-
-**Stale unread:** 1 message(s) older than 3 day(s) — triage at session start.
-**Missing thread_id:** 1 unread message(s) lack supersession chains.
-- ! state-hub: [BREAKING] Task status canon: wait/todo/progress/done/cancel  `8dbd52c2`
+**Open tasks:**
+- ! Provision and prove live registrations  `607897c5`
 
 ---
 ## MCP Orientation (when available)

.gitignore

@@ -174,3 +174,6 @@ cython_debug/
 # PyPI configuration file
 .pypirc
 
+
+# Generated workstation repository index
+.repo-manager/

INTENT.md

@@ -1,19 +1,15 @@
 # INTENT
 
-> **NetKingdom layering review — 2026-08-28.** This repository's role was reviewed
-> against the NetKingdom IT-security layer model: **Taxonomy → Tooling → Engines →
-> Staff**, layered by determinism and by the kind of artifact each layer produces.
-> Findings and the argument behind them:
-> `gate-house/history/2026-08-28-security-layer-model-and-gate-house-recut.md`.
-> The model is `net-kingdom/canon/standards/security-layer-model_v0.1.md` (proposed),
-> ratified by `gate-house/decisions/decisions.md` GH-DEC-2026-001.
->
-> The layer rule that binds every repository: **Staff never touches tooling
-> directly. It acts only through engine APIs.**
->
-> **This repository is Tooling — deterministic infrastructure and state.** State the layer: key-cape packages the third-party identity tooling (authelia, lldap, privacy-idea) behind a versioned IAM profile. It owns authentication and identity claims only. Because "auth" is ambiguous across the estate, this INTENT should say explicitly that key-cape is **not** an authorization decision point — that is access-engine's, and it stays the only one.
->
-> *This note records what should change. The body below is not yet adapted.*
+KeyCape declares its layer as **Tooling** under the NetKingdom security layer
+model v0.4. It provides deterministic authentication and identity claims through
+the versioned IAM profile, packaging Authelia, LLDAP, and privacyIDEA.
+Authorization decisions belong to access-engine; KeyCape is not an authorization
+decision point. Issuing a role or scope claim does not decide access to a resource.
+
+These backend components are implementation dependencies of KeyCape's tooling
+boundary. Separate catalog entries are unnecessary until they expose independently
+owned estate capabilities. Staff integration follows engine APIs as required by
+the layer model; this declaration does not certify every existing caller path.
 
 ## Purpose
 

WORK-RECORDS.md

@@ -8,8 +8,9 @@
 
 | Kind | ID | Status | Lane | Source |
 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
-| workplan | KEY-WP-0001 | done | — | workplans/KEY-WP-0001-keycape-implementation.md |
-| workplan | KEY-WP-0002 | done | — | workplans/KEY-WP-0002-container-image-gitea.md |
+| workplan | ADHOC-2026-09-05 | finished | — | workplans/ADHOC-2026-09-05.md |
+| workplan | KEY-WP-0001 | finished | — | workplans/KEY-WP-0001-keycape-implementation.md |
+| workplan | KEY-WP-0002 | finished | — | workplans/KEY-WP-0002-container-image-gitea.md |
 | workplan | KEY-WP-0003 | finished | — | workplans/KEY-WP-0003-bootstrap-console-oidc-mfa-login.md |
 | workplan | KEY-WP-0004 | finished | — | workplans/KEY-WP-0004-binky-hedgehog-tenant-onboarding.md |
 | workplan | KEY-WP-0005 | finished | — | workplans/KEY-WP-0005-iam-profile-core-claims.md |
@@ -19,6 +20,10 @@
 | workplan | KEY-WP-0009 | finished | — | workplans/KEY-WP-0009-provider-capabilities-and-service-identities.md |
 | workplan | KEY-WP-0010 | finished | — | workplans/KEY-WP-0010-openbao-operator-loopback-callback.md |
 | workplan | KEY-WP-0011 | finished | — | workplans/KEY-WP-0011-live-secret-exposure-recovery.md |
+| workplan | KEY-WP-0012 | finished | — | workplans/KEY-WP-0012-userinfo-canonical-subject-resolution.md |
+| workplan | KEY-WP-0013 | blocked | — | workplans/KEY-WP-0013-approval-engine-resource-audience.md |
+| workplan | KEY-WP-0014 | proposed | — | workplans/KEY-WP-0014-native-credential-lane-handoff.md |
+| task | ADHOC-2026-09-05-T01 | done | — | workplans/ADHOC-2026-09-05.md |
 | task | KEY-WP-0001-T01 | done | — | workplans/KEY-WP-0001-keycape-implementation.md |
 | task | KEY-WP-0001-T02 | done | — | workplans/KEY-WP-0001-keycape-implementation.md |
 | task | KEY-WP-0001-T03 | done | — | workplans/KEY-WP-0001-keycape-implementation.md |
@@ -83,4 +88,11 @@
 | task | KEY-WP-0011-T01 | done | — | workplans/KEY-WP-0011-live-secret-exposure-recovery.md |
 | task | KEY-WP-0011-T02 | done | — | workplans/KEY-WP-0011-live-secret-exposure-recovery.md |
 | task | KEY-WP-0011-T03 | done | — | workplans/KEY-WP-0011-live-secret-exposure-recovery.md |
-| intake | KEY-IN-0001 | open | — | intakes/intakes.md |
+| task | KEY-WP-0012-T01 | done | — | workplans/KEY-WP-0012-userinfo-canonical-subject-resolution.md |
+| task | KEY-WP-0012-T02 | done | — | workplans/KEY-WP-0012-userinfo-canonical-subject-resolution.md |
+| task | KEY-WP-0012-T03 | done | — | workplans/KEY-WP-0012-userinfo-canonical-subject-resolution.md |
+| task | KEY-WP-0013-T01 | done | — | workplans/KEY-WP-0013-approval-engine-resource-audience.md |
+| task | KEY-WP-0013-T02 | wait | — | workplans/KEY-WP-0013-approval-engine-resource-audience.md |
+| task | KEY-WP-0014-T01 | todo | — | workplans/KEY-WP-0014-native-credential-lane-handoff.md |
+| task | KEY-WP-0014-T02 | todo | — | workplans/KEY-WP-0014-native-credential-lane-handoff.md |
+| intake | KEY-IN-0001 | closed | — | intakes/intakes.md |

config/service-clients.example.yaml

@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
-# Non-secret static registration fragments for KeyCape's bounded OpenBao JWT
-# consumers. Merge these entries into the deployment-owned KeyCape config.
+# Non-secret static registration fragments for KeyCape's bounded JWT consumers. Merge these entries into the deployment-owned KeyCape config.
 # The named environment variables must be materialized by an approved
 # out-of-repository custody path; this file never contains their values.
 clients:
@@ -24,3 +23,27 @@ clients:
     tenant: "tenant:coulomb"
     roles: ["secrets-engine"]
     tokenLifetime: "15m"
+
+  - clientId: "secrets-engine-approval"
+    displayName: "secrets-engine approval consume client"
+    audience: "approval-engine"
+    allowedScopes: ["approval:read", "approval:consume"]
+    grantTypes: ["client_credentials"]
+    clientType: "confidential"
+    secretRef: "env:KEYCAPE_SECRETS_ENGINE_APPROVAL_CLIENT_SECRET"
+    serviceSubject: "service:secrets-engine"
+    tenant: "tenant:coulomb"
+    roles: ["secrets-engine"]
+    tokenLifetime: "15m"
+
+  - clientId: "approval-engine-operator"
+    displayName: "approval-engine lifecycle operator"
+    audience: "approval-engine"
+    allowedScopes: ["approval:create", "approval:read", "approval:approve", "approval:revoke", "approval:supersede", "approval:observe", "approval:emit"]
+    grantTypes: ["client_credentials"]
+    clientType: "confidential"
+    secretRef: "env:KEYCAPE_APPROVAL_ENGINE_OPERATOR_CLIENT_SECRET"
+    serviceSubject: "service:approval-engine-operator"
+    tenant: "tenant:coulomb"
+    roles: ["approval-operator"]
+    tokenLifetime: "15m"

docs/approval-engine-auth-contract.md

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+# Approval-engine token contract
+
+Static client registrations may set `audience: approval-engine`. This selects
+only the access-token audience; OIDC ID tokens retain `aud=clientId`. Omitting
+`audience` preserves the existing client-ID access audience, including OpenBao
+consumers. Request `audience` and `resource` parameters cannot override it.
+Access tokens contain the granted `scope` string for both supported grant types.
+
+`config/service-clients.example.yaml` provides the two requested confidential
+clients: secrets-engine-approval gets read/consume, and approval-engine-operator
+gets lifecycle/observation scopes without consume. Service tokens contain
+`principal_type=service`, tenant, roles, scope, assurance, issuer, subject,
+audience, issue time and expiry; the lifetime is 15 minutes. The issuer signs
+with RS256 and publishes its public key through `/jwks`.
+
+Human approvers need a separate authorization-code/PKCE registration with an
+exact deployment-owned callback, `audience: approval-engine`,
+`allowedScopes: [openid, approval:approve]`, and `mfaRequired: true`. Do not add
+consume or other approval grants to that client. No callback is invented here.
+The ID token is for the login client; present the access token to approval-engine.
+
+These fragments are not live registrations. Deployment requires custody-managed
+values for the named environment references, the exact human callback, and a
+rollout of this version. Never log the token or secret. Verify the resulting
+access token against the deployed issuer's `/jwks`, checking issuer, audience,
+expiry, subject, principal type, tenant, roles, scope and assurance. Verify that
+operator consume and human consume requests are rejected. Local tests verify
+signatures against the JWKS handler; they do not constitute live issuance proof.
+
+KeyCape owns issuance and client grants/disablement. OpenBao and the deployment
+operator own credential custody; approval-engine enforces its resource policy.

intakes/intakes.md

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ id: KEY-IN-0001
 kind: intake
 title: 'Declaration requested: state this repository''s layer in INTENT.md (security
   layer model §11)'
-status: open
+status: closed
 origin: cross-repo
 origin_ref: net-kingdom security-layer-model_v0.4 §11
 priority: low
@@ -34,5 +34,7 @@ description: 'A conformance sweep on 2026-08-28 found this repository has no lay
   actually does, that is more useful to us than a label added to close a checkbox.
   Standard: net-kingdom/canon/standards/security-layer-model_v0.4.md.'
 created: '2026-08-28T21:01:53.604723Z'
-updated: '2026-08-28T21:01:53.604723Z'
+updated: '2026-09-05'
+resolution: 'Declared Tooling ownership and authorization boundary in INTENT.md; backend components remain implementation dependencies.'
+state_hub_intake_id: "01a06e8d-5b4b-7202-96e3-c7304640c3a6"
 ```

src/cmd/keycape/clients_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+package main
+
+import (
+	"keycape/internal/config"
+	"testing"
+	"time"
+)
+
+func TestServiceRegistrationAudienceAndScopeIsolation(t *testing.T) {
+	cfg, err := config.Load("../../../config/service-clients.example.yaml")
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatal(err)
+	}
+	for _, c := range cfg.Clients {
+		t.Setenv(c.SecretRef[4:], "test-only-secret")
+	}
+	registry, err := buildClientRegistry(cfg.Clients)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatal(err)
+	}
+	for _, id := range []string{"secrets-engine-approval", "approval-engine-operator"} {
+		c := registry[id]
+		if c == nil || c.Audience != "approval-engine" || c.TokenLifetime != 15*time.Minute {
+			t.Fatalf("invalid registration for %s", id)
+		}
+		for _, scope := range c.AllowedScopes {
+			if id == "approval-engine-operator" && scope == "approval:consume" {
+				t.Fatal("operator may not consume")
+			}
+			if id == "secrets-engine-approval" && scope != "approval:read" && scope != "approval:consume" {
+				t.Fatal("excess PEP scope")
+			}
+		}
+	}
+	if registry["secrets-engine-openbao"].Audience != "" {
+		t.Fatal("OpenBao audience default changed")
+	}
+}

src/cmd/keycape/main.go

@@ -290,6 +290,7 @@ func buildClientRegistry(cfgClients []config.ClientConfig) (map[string]*domain.C
 			ClientType:      c.ClientType,
 			SecretRef:       c.SecretRef,
 			ClientSecret:    clientSecret,
+			Audience:        c.Audience,
 			ServiceSubject:  c.ServiceSubject,
 			Tenant:          c.Tenant,
 			Roles:           c.Roles,

src/internal/config/config.go

@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ type Config struct {
 // ClientConfig is a static OIDC client registration.
 type ClientConfig struct {
 	ClientID        string   `yaml:"clientId"`
+	Audience        string   `yaml:"audience,omitempty"`
 	DisplayName     string   `yaml:"displayName"`
 	RedirectURIs    []string `yaml:"redirectUris"`
 	AllowedScopes   []string `yaml:"allowedScopes"`

src/internal/config/config_test.go

@@ -385,8 +385,8 @@ func TestServiceClientExampleContracts(t *testing.T) {
 	if errs := config.ValidateConfig(cfg); len(errs) != 0 {
 		t.Fatalf("service client examples must validate: %v", errs)
 	}
-	if len(cfg.Clients) != 2 {
-		t.Fatalf("service client examples: want 2, got %d", len(cfg.Clients))
+	if len(cfg.Clients) != 4 {
+		t.Fatalf("service client examples: want 4, got %d", len(cfg.Clients))
 	}
 
 	codingAgent := cfg.Clients[0]
@@ -479,3 +479,20 @@ func containsErr(errs []string, substring string) bool {
 	}
 	return false
 }
+
+func TestValidateConfigAudience(t *testing.T) {
+	for _, audience := range []string{"", "approval-engine", "https://api.example.com"} {
+		cfg := validConfig("key.pem")
+		cfg.Clients[0].Audience = audience
+		if errs := config.ValidateConfig(cfg); len(errs) != 0 {
+			t.Fatalf("valid audience %q: %v", audience, errs)
+		}
+	}
+	for _, audience := range []string{" ", "approval-engine other", "approval-engine\n"} {
+		cfg := validConfig("key.pem")
+		cfg.Clients[0].Audience = audience
+		if errs := config.ValidateConfig(cfg); len(errs) == 0 {
+			t.Fatalf("accepted audience %q", audience)
+		}
+	}
+}

src/internal/config/validate.go

@@ -42,6 +42,9 @@ func ValidateConfig(cfg *Config) []string {
 			prefix = fmt.Sprintf("clients[%d]", i)
 			errs = append(errs, prefix+": clientId must not be empty")
 		}
+		if strings.TrimSpace(c.Audience) != c.Audience || strings.ContainsAny(c.Audience, " \t\r\n") {
+			errs = append(errs, prefix+": audience must be a single non-whitespace identifier")
+		}
 		hasAuthorizationCode := contains(c.GrantTypes, "authorization_code")
 		hasClientCredentials := contains(c.GrantTypes, "client_credentials")
 		if (hasAuthorizationCode || !hasClientCredentials) && len(c.RedirectURIs) == 0 {

src/internal/domain/model.go

@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ type Client struct {
 	ClientType     string   `yaml:"clientType" json:"clientType"` // "confidential" | "public"
 	SecretRef      string   `yaml:"secretRef,omitempty" json:"secretRef,omitempty"`
 	ClientSecret   string   `yaml:"-" json:"-"`
+	Audience       string   `yaml:"audience,omitempty" json:"audience,omitempty"`
 	ServiceSubject string   `yaml:"serviceSubject,omitempty" json:"serviceSubject,omitempty"`
 	Tenant         string   `yaml:"tenant,omitempty" json:"tenant,omitempty"`
 	Roles          []string `yaml:"roles,omitempty" json:"roles,omitempty"`

src/internal/server/oidc/audience_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
+package oidc_test
+
+import (
+	"crypto"
+	"crypto/rsa"
+	"crypto/sha256"
+	"encoding/base64"
+	"encoding/json"
+	"math/big"
+	"net/http"
+	"net/http/httptest"
+	"net/url"
+	"strings"
+	"testing"
+
+	"keycape/internal/domain"
+	"keycape/internal/server/oidc"
+	"keycape/internal/server/telemetry"
+)
+
+func verifyWithJWKS(t *testing.T, h *oidc.TokenHandler, token string) {
+	t.Helper()
+	keys := oidc.NewKeySet()
+	keys.AddKey("key-1", &h.SigningKey.PublicKey)
+	w := httptest.NewRecorder()
+	oidc.NewJWKSHandler(keys).ServeHTTP(w, httptest.NewRequest(http.MethodGet, "/jwks", nil))
+	var response struct {
+		Keys []oidc.JWK `json:"keys"`
+	}
+	if err := json.Unmarshal(w.Body.Bytes(), &response); err != nil {
+		t.Fatal(err)
+	}
+	if len(response.Keys) != 1 {
+		t.Fatal("missing signing key")
+	}
+	key := response.Keys[0]
+	n, err := base64.RawURLEncoding.DecodeString(key.N)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatal(err)
+	}
+	e, err := base64.RawURLEncoding.DecodeString(key.E)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatal(err)
+	}
+	parts := strings.Split(token, ".")
+	if len(parts) != 3 {
+		t.Fatal("invalid JWT")
+	}
+	sig, err := base64.RawURLEncoding.DecodeString(parts[2])
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatal(err)
+	}
+	digest := sha256.Sum256([]byte(parts[0] + "." + parts[1]))
+	pub := rsa.PublicKey{N: new(big.Int).SetBytes(n), E: int(new(big.Int).SetBytes(e).Int64())}
+	if err := rsa.VerifyPKCS1v15(&pub, crypto.SHA256, digest[:], sig); err != nil {
+		t.Fatal(err)
+	}
+}
+
+func TestServiceAudienceIsStaticAndDefaultsToClientID(t *testing.T) {
+	for _, audience := range []string{"", "approval-engine"} {
+		t.Run(audience, func(t *testing.T) {
+			h := serviceTokenHandler(t)
+			h.ClientConfig["rapp-qonto"].Audience = audience
+			req := tokenRequest(url.Values{"grant_type": {"client_credentials"}, "audience": {"attacker"}, "resource": {"attacker"}})
+			req.SetBasicAuth("rapp-qonto", "test-service-secret")
+			w := httptest.NewRecorder()
+			h.ServeHTTP(w, req)
+			if w.Code != 200 {
+				t.Fatalf("status %d", w.Code)
+			}
+			token := decodeTokenResponse(t, w.Body.String())["access_token"].(string)
+			want := audience
+			if want == "" {
+				want = "rapp-qonto"
+			}
+			if parseJWTPayload(t, token)["aud"] != want {
+				t.Fatal("wrong audience")
+			}
+			verifyWithJWKS(t, h, token)
+		})
+	}
+}
+
+func TestHumanResourceAudiencePreservesIDTokenAudience(t *testing.T) {
+	sessions := oidc.NewSessionStore()
+	h, _ := newTokenHandler(t, sessions, &mockUserRepo{users: map[string]*domain.User{"alice": aliceUser()}})
+	h.ClientConfig["test-client"].Audience = "approval-engine"
+	h.ClientConfig["test-client"].AllowedScopes = []string{"openid", "approval:approve"}
+	verifier := "test-verifier"
+	code := seededSession(sessions, verifier)
+	sess, _ := sessions.Get(code)
+	sess.Scopes = []string{"openid", "approval:approve"}
+	w := httptest.NewRecorder()
+	h.ServeHTTP(w, tokenRequest(url.Values{"grant_type": {"authorization_code"}, "client_id": {"test-client"}, "code": {code}, "code_verifier": {verifier}}))
+	if w.Code != 200 {
+		t.Fatalf("status %d: %s", w.Code, w.Body.String())
+	}
+	response := decodeTokenResponse(t, w.Body.String())
+	access := response["access_token"].(string)
+	id := response["id_token"].(string)
+	claims := parseJWTPayload(t, access)
+	if claims["aud"] != "approval-engine" || claims["scope"] != "openid approval:approve" || claims["principal_type"] != "human" {
+		t.Fatalf("wrong access claims: %v", claims)
+	}
+	if parseJWTPayload(t, id)["aud"] != "test-client" {
+		t.Fatal("ID token audience changed")
+	}
+	verifyWithJWKS(t, h, access)
+	verifyWithJWKS(t, h, id)
+}
+
+func TestHumanExcessScopeRejectedBeforeAuthentication(t *testing.T) {
+	h := newAuthorizeHandler(nil, nil, telemetry.NoopEmitter{})
+	params := validAuthorizeParams()
+	params.Set("scope", "openid approval:consume")
+	w := httptest.NewRecorder()
+	h.ServeHTTP(w, httptest.NewRequest(http.MethodGet, "/authorize?"+params.Encode(), nil))
+	if w.Code != http.StatusBadRequest {
+		t.Fatalf("status %d", w.Code)
+	}
+}
+
+func TestTokenRejectsScopeRemovedAfterAuthorization(t *testing.T) {
+	sessions := oidc.NewSessionStore()
+	h, _ := newTokenHandler(t, sessions, &mockUserRepo{})
+	code := seededSession(sessions, "verifier")
+	h.ClientConfig["test-client"].AllowedScopes = []string{"openid"}
+	w := httptest.NewRecorder()
+	h.ServeHTTP(w, tokenRequest(url.Values{"grant_type": {"authorization_code"}, "client_id": {"test-client"}, "code": {code}, "code_verifier": {"verifier"}}))
+	if w.Code != http.StatusBadRequest {
+		t.Fatalf("status %d", w.Code)
+	}
+}

src/internal/server/oidc/authorize.go

@@ -190,6 +190,13 @@ func (h *AuthorizeHandler) serveAuthorize(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request
 		return
 	}
 
+	for _, requestedScope := range strings.Fields(scope) {
+		if !containsString(client.AllowedScopes, requestedScope) {
+			profileerrors.InvalidProfileUsage("requested scope is not allowed", "scope").Write(w, http.StatusBadRequest)
+			return
+		}
+	}
+
 	// 5. Validate code_challenge is present.
 	if codeChallenge == "" {
 		profileerrors.InvalidProfileUsage(

src/internal/server/oidc/authorize_test.go

@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ func testClient() map[string]*domain.Client {
 			ClientID:      "test-client",
 			DisplayName:   "Test Client",
 			RedirectURIs:  []string{"https://app.example.com/callback"},
-			AllowedScopes: []string{"openid", "profile", "email"},
+			AllowedScopes: []string{"openid", "profile", "email", "groups"},
 			ClientType:    "public",
 		},
 		"netkingdom-bootstrap-console": {

src/internal/server/oidc/token.go

@@ -93,6 +93,14 @@ func (h *TokenHandler) ServeHTTP(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
 		return
 	}
 
+	// Recheck grants in case the client registration changed after authorization.
+	for _, scope := range sess.Scopes {
+		if !containsString(h.ClientConfig[clientID].AllowedScopes, scope) {
+			profileerrors.InvalidProfileUsage("requested scope is not allowed", "scope").Write(w, http.StatusBadRequest)
+			return
+		}
+	}
+
 	// 4. Verify PKCE code_verifier.
 	if !verifyPKCE(codeVerifier, sess.PKCEChallenge) {
 		profileerrors.InvalidProfileUsage(
@@ -169,12 +177,24 @@ func (h *TokenHandler) ServeHTTP(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
 		return
 	}
 
+	// Access tokens target the statically registered resource server. ID tokens
+	// remain bound to the OIDC relying party.
+	if audience := h.ClientConfig[clientID].Audience; audience != "" {
+		claims["aud"] = audience
+	}
+	claims["scope"] = strings.Join(sess.Scopes, " ")
+	accessToken, err := buildJWT(claims, kid, h.SigningKey)
+	if err != nil {
+		http.Error(w, "failed to build JWT", http.StatusInternalServerError)
+		return
+	}
+
 	// 8. Delete used PKCE session (prevent replay).
 	h.Sessions.Delete(code)
 
 	// 9. Build response.
 	resp := tokenResponse{
-		AccessToken: jwtToken,
+		AccessToken: accessToken,
 		TokenType:   "Bearer",
 		ExpiresIn:   int(h.TokenLifetime.Seconds()),
 		IDToken:     jwtToken,
@@ -239,7 +259,7 @@ func (h *TokenHandler) serveClientCredentials(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Req
 	claims := map[string]interface{}{
 		"iss":            h.Issuer,
 		"sub":            client.ServiceSubject,
-		"aud":            clientID,
+		"aud":            accessAudience(client),
 		"exp":            now.Add(tokenLifetime).Unix(),
 		"iat":            now.Unix(),
 		"tenant":         client.Tenant,
@@ -393,3 +413,11 @@ func buildJWT(claims map[string]interface{}, kid string, key *rsa.PrivateKey) (s
 
 	return strings.Join([]string{hdrB64, payloadB64, sigB64}, "."), nil
 }
+
+// accessAudience is configured by the issuer, never selected by request input.
+func accessAudience(client *domain.Client) string {
+	if client.Audience != "" {
+		return client.Audience
+	}
+	return client.ClientID
+}

workplans/ADHOC-2026-09-05.md

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+---
+id: ADHOC-2026-09-05
+type: workplan
+title: "Repository review and layer declaration"
+domain: infotech
+repo: key-cape
+status: finished
+owner: codex
+created: "2026-09-05"
+updated: "2026-09-05"
+state_hub_workstream_id: "6f5a12f0-5dac-5e02-bbd9-9ab2263264ba"
+---
+
+## Resolve declaration intake and normalize repository records
+
+```task
+id: ADHOC-2026-09-05-T01
+status: done
+priority: low
+state_hub_task_id: "54c89abe-2539-550d-bc3a-649af8d4580a"
+```
+
+Reviewed KEY-IN-0001 against local security-layer-model_v0.4. Declared Tooling
+and the authentication/authorization boundary in INTENT.md and closed the intake.
+Normalized two legacy completed workplan frontmatter statuses to finished.
+Ignored the generated .repo-manager workstation cache. Existing task statuses
+already conform to the State Hub task lifecycle canon.

workplans/KEY-WP-0001-keycape-implementation.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ type: workplan
 title: "KeyCape Implementation — Lightweight IAM Profile"
 domain: infotech
 repo: key-cape
-status: done
+status: finished
 owner: Bernd
 topic_slug: netkingdom
 topic_id: a6c6e745-bf54-4465-9340-1534a2be493e

workplans/KEY-WP-0002-container-image-gitea.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ type: workplan
 title: "KeyCape Container Image — Build & Publish to Gitea OCI Registry"
 domain: infotech
 repo: key-cape
-status: done
+status: finished
 owner: netkingdom
 topic_slug: netkingdom
 created: "2026-03-22"

workplans/KEY-WP-0013-approval-engine-resource-audience.md

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+---
+id: KEY-WP-0013
+type: workplan
+title: "Approval-engine resource audience and client registrations"
+domain: infotech
+repo: key-cape
+status: blocked
+owner: codex
+topic_slug: approval-engine-resource-audience
+created: "2026-09-05"
+updated: "2026-09-05"
+state_hub_workstream_id: "6e815d88-b0e3-5ce0-be5d-13ab15917f7f"
+---
+
+Source: approval-engine inbox request 5583e896-52f2-45bd-895f-02f227b7e836,
+reviewed against its local registration and caller-authentication contracts.
+
+## Implement static resource audiences
+
+```task
+id: KEY-WP-0013-T01
+status: done
+priority: high
+state_hub_task_id: "a92432a2-4e92-5b90-be2b-d82b784bf8f0"
+```
+
+Added optional static audience configuration for access tokens in both grants;
+ID tokens retain the relying-party audience. Added human access-token scope.
+Published bounded approval service fragments and the human registration contract.
+Regression tests cover the default audience, request override resistance, JWKS
+signature validation, ID-token separation and service registration scope isolation.
+Browser requests and token exchanges now enforce the client scope allow-list,
+including grants removed after authorization.
+
+## Provision and prove live registrations
+
+```task
+id: KEY-WP-0013-T02
+status: wait
+priority: high
+state_hub_task_id: "607897c5-bad9-55e5-86df-7802f592d6e8"
+```
+
+Needs deployment-owned custody for both new secret references and an exact human
+callback registration. Deploy the implementation and registrations together,
+then prove live JWKS verification and denied excess scopes without logging values.
+Local signature proof is not live rollout evidence. See docs/approval-engine-auth-contract.md.

workplans/KEY-WP-0014-native-credential-lane-handoff.md

@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+---
+id: KEY-WP-0014
+type: workplan
+title: "Review native login and client credential lane handoffs"
+domain: infotech
+repo: key-cape
+status: proposed
+owner: codex
+topic_slug: native-credential-lane-handoff
+created: "2026-09-05"
+updated: "2026-09-05"
+state_hub_workstream_id: "0d003df3-f7d3-5063-8ca0-e1e33f7df74a"
+---
+
+Source: ops-warden inbox message 0dd9c7bd-0ecd-42d1-806f-7cc4ba9730ed.
+The issuer supports client_secret_basic exchange, but has no native exchange or
+rotation CLI. Existing machine issuance ownership does not complete this handoff.
+
+## Design owner command and custody boundaries
+
+```task
+id: KEY-WP-0014-T01
+status: todo
+priority: medium
+state_hub_task_id: "0c0a0b61-c19e-5631-9cda-8b2dc0f47d8f"
+```
+
+Review ops-warden's existing key-cape-oidc-login proxy and
+rapp-qonto-keycape-client route contracts. Specify the native interactive login
+and bounded exchange commands, token delivery, renewal and custody-mediated
+rotation before implementation. Keep secret custody with OpenBao and avoid
+retiring the proxy until replacement commands have equivalent verification.
+
+## Verify handoff delivery evidence
+
+```task
+id: KEY-WP-0014-T02
+status: todo
+priority: low
+state_hub_task_id: "d9a5de97-b7d5-5599-98c2-eaab32f51495"
+```
+
+Ops-warden reports KEY-WP-0009-T04's claimed reply did not arrive. Verify prior
+receipts for all four named recipients before claiming successful notification.
+No outbound coordination messages were sent during the 2026-09-05 repo review.